spurious secondary index writes

Hi, On my cluster, I am using the Multi backend, with a bunch of bitcask backends configured and a leveldb one. However, I am *never* writing to the leveldb backend. And I'm never writing any 2i However, riak-admin status is reporting secondary index writes: sudo riak-admin status | grep index

An outbound handoff of partition error enotconn

Hi Riak-users, I have found some errors related to handoff of partition in /etc/riak/log/errors. Details are as below: 2015-07-30 16:04:33.643 [error] <0.12872.15>@riak_core_handoff_sender:start_fold:262 ownership_transfer transfer of riak_kv_vnode from 'riak@10.21.136.76' 45671926166590716193865

Selective indexing of Riak Data Types

Hi all, I was curios if there's a way to enable Solr indexing on only some of the fields of a Riak CRDT Map (not all of them). E.g. for a map: [{"field_1", "register"}, {"field_2", "register"}] I would like to _only_ create the Solar index field_1_register . By default if I enable search on a buc

Re: Selective indexing of Riak Data Types

Hello Marius, Yes, you can by just specifying those fields in the schema, e.g. field_1_register. For example, I created similar fields in this test (using a custom schema, inlined): https://github.com/basho/riak_test/pull/800/files#diff-ab08303805d0b8fe5d7fe683273b2fbfR75

Re: Selective indexing of Riak Data Types

Hi Zeeshan, It makes sense, thanks loads for the pointer & code examples, it's exactly what I was looking for. Cheers, Marius On 31 July 2015 at 16:14, Zeeshan Lakhani wrote: > Hello Marius, > > Yes, you can by just specifying those fields in the schema, e.g. > field_1_register. For example, I

Re: Selective indexing of Riak Data Types

No problem :). Zeeshan Lakhani programmer | software engineer at @basho | org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | paperswelove.org twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > On Jul 31, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Marius Cobzarenco wrote: > > Hi Zeeshan, > > It makes sense, thanks loads for the pointer & code exam

Riak CS Node Shutdown Because it Ran Out Data Space - Unbalanced With Other Nodes in Cluster

We have a Riak CS node that ran out of space on the data mount and the service shutdown. This is strange since the other nodes in the cluster seem to be about 76%-78% full. Why is it so out of balance and how can it be fixed? Node - Riak07 (failed) Filesystem1K-blocks Used

Riak Recap - July 31, 2015

Hey everyone! As always, there's been some great knowledge sharing over the user lists. Here is your biweekly Recap! Note that many of the "unanswered" are brand new and I know we'll get to answering them. I just want you all to know we keep track of these. ## Announcements * There's a new Java c