[issue3497] a bug in the interpreter?

2008-08-03 Thread vadim suvorov
New submission from vadim suvorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The result of the attached script execution is extremely unstable. The change in the print statement in line 146 from 'print "1"' to 'print 1' (string literal to numerical) changes the result of execution

[issue3497] a bug in the interpreter?

2008-08-03 Thread vadim suvorov
Changes by vadim suvorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11046/nonogramsolver09.py ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.pytho

[issue3497] a bug in the interpreter?

2008-08-03 Thread vadim suvorov
vadim suvorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: tested Python 2.4.4 on WinXP SP3. It required minor modifications of the code (removing conditional expressions), but the effect stayed. ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://

[issue3497] a bug in the interpreter?

2008-08-03 Thread vadim suvorov
Changes by vadim suvorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- versions: +Python 2.4 ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue3497> ___ __

[issue3497] a bug in the interpreter?

2008-08-03 Thread vadim suvorov
vadim suvorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Thank you very much, Tim. I am still very much confused, how change in print statement changes order in which items are removed from a set. I presumed it to be undefined but deterministic (similar to dict()): while I cannot tell which

[issue3497] a bug in the interpreter?

2008-08-03 Thread vadim suvorov
vadim suvorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Tim, Martin, thank you very much. I think now it is not an issue, and the record can be closed. Thank you very much again, and please accept my apology. 2 Guilherme Polo: I ran it many times. The results in WinXP (with constant scrip

[issue5634] cPickle error in case of recursion limit

2009-03-31 Thread vadim suvorov
New submission from vadim suvorov : In case of heavily recursive data structure cPickle produces intermittent random exceptions (AttributeError, etc.). The expected is RuntimeError: ('maximum recursion depth exceeded in ...'). In addition, the behavior differs for classic/new cla