New submission from bonnet:
struct.calcsize('i?') : 21
appears to be incorrect ; in C sizeof : 24
C code:
typedef struct {
int param1;
int param2;
int param3;
int param4;
int param5;
unsigned char param6;
} struct_titi6;
main:
struct_titi6 toto3;
printf(&qu
Mike Bonnet added the comment:
How can this be considered a new feature? Code that worked under
python2.4 fails under python2.5 as a result of this bug. That is
clearly a regression. I think that qualifies it for a backport to
python2.5.
_
Tracker <[EM
