Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
--- Comment #4 from Hung-Yi Chen ---
Created attachment 226354
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226354&action=edit
www_mitmproxy.patch
I've attached a patch for that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
Hung-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|maintainer-feedback?(gaod@h |maintainer-feedback+
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257032
Danilo G. Baio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|python@FreeBSD.org |db...@freebsd.org
Sta
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
--- Comment #5 from Hung-Yi Chen ---
Ooops, it seems we still need a patch for 6.0.2. I'll make a new patch later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
Hung-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226354||maintainer-approval-
F
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
--- Comment #6 from Hung-Yi Chen ---
Created attachment 226359
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=226359&action=edit
www_mitmproxy.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
Hung-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #226359||maintainer-approval+
F
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
--- Comment #7 from p5b2e9...@t-online.de ---
# https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/requirements/#install-requires
# It is not considered best practice to use install_requires to pin
dependencies to specific versions.
With this wisdom fo
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257041
--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Neal Nelson from comment #2)
- Yep, its a virtual category. Please add them
- Yep, it's policy, but the 'reason' is 'sdists via pypi' tests the end-to-end
Python packaging workflows and
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257041
--- Comment #4 from Dan Langille ---
If you hit any issues and feel like it's hard, ask. It's a complex environment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
--- Comment #8 from Kubil
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257073
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|www/mitmproxy fails to |www/mitmproxy: Fails to
14 matches
Mail list logo
