Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes

2017-09-14 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
v 42.2.0, and maybe the wiki should also mention from what version of the driver it is supported (I guess for all cases, unless their versioning would be synced with PostgreSQL's). Álvaro -- Alvaro Hernandez --- OnGres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-

Re: [HACKERS] SCRAM in the PG 10 release notes

2017-09-14 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 14/09/17 18:06, Dave Cramer wrote: On 14 September 2017 at 02:21, Alvaro Hernandez <mailto:a...@ongres.com>> wrote: On 14/09/17 08:57, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 09/12/2017 04:09 AM, Noah Misch wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:50:51PM -0400, Bruc

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-22 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
or/tree/master/pgoutput and produces output defined by the "ChangePb" structure defined here: https://github.com/apigee-labs/transicator/blob/master/common/transicator.proto     How about using pgoutput, which is included by default in PostgreSQL 10, as the basis for logic

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-23 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
epresentation format (or that supports several formats, not only json).     Regards,     Álvaro -- Alvaro Hernandez --- OnGres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-24 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 24/09/17 02:41, Euler Taveira wrote: 2017-09-23 14:01 GMT-03:00 Alvaro Hernandez : However, AFAIK, AWS's DMS uses it for production purposes (see http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/CHAP_PostgreSQL.html). It seems a bad idea. AFAICS test_decoding was not des

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
thing that is, indeed, more general, i.e., that supports high-performance scenarios too?     Álvaro -- Alvaro Hernandez --- OnGres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 25/09/17 19:56, Andrew Dunstan wrote: On 09/25/2017 12:48 PM, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: On 25/09/17 19:39, Petr Jelinek wrote: Well, test_decoding is not meant for production use anyway, no need for middleware to support it. The pgoutput is primarily used for internal replication purposes

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 25/09/17 20:18, Andres Freund wrote: On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:     However, if DMS uses it for what I'd call production use, I assume it is actually production quality. I bet they do enough testing, and don't ship software to potentially millions of

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 25/09/17 20:31, Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 09/25/2017 10:19 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: On 25/09/17 18:48, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: In my opinion, logical decoding plugins that don't come with core are close to worthless (don't get me wrong): I respectfully disagree.

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 25/09/17 22:13, Magnus Hagander wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Alvaro Hernandez <mailto:a...@ongres.com>> wrote: On 25/09/17 20:18, Andres Freund wrote: On 2017-09-24 13:36:56 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: However, if DMS uses it for what

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 25/09/17 22:08, Jignesh Shah wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake mailto:j...@commandprompt.com>> wrote: On 09/25/2017 11:31 AM, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: Whether or not they are included in a managed environment is generally ba

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-25 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 25/09/17 21:38, Andres Freund wrote: On 2017-09-25 21:31:11 +0300, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: - Distribution and testing are non-trivial: many OS/archs combinations. Yes, it is. Why would we want to increase that burden to this community?     That's a different story, and one I c

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-26 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 26/09/17 10:03, Craig Ringer wrote: On 26 September 2017 at 14:08, Alvaro Hernandez <mailto:a...@ongres.com>> wrote:     OK, let me try to do that. I believe data integration is a priority. Definitely agree so far. - If you want to develop your own output plugin,

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-26 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 26/09/17 12:57, Petr Jelinek wrote: On 26/09/17 09:26, Alvaro Hernandez wrote: On 26/09/17 10:03, Craig Ringer wrote: On 26 September 2017 at 14:08, Alvaro Hernandez mailto:a...@ongres.com>> wrote: - If you stick to in-core plugins, then you need to support at least

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-26 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 26/09/17 10:55, Craig Ringer wrote: On 26 September 2017 at 15:26, Alvaro Hernandez <mailto:a...@ongres.com>> wrote:     That's better than nothing. But as much as interoperable json may be, people still need to talk the (binary) replication protocol to use

Re: [HACKERS] Built-in plugin for logical decoding output

2017-09-26 Thread Alvaro Hernandez
On 26/09/17 17:50, Craig Ringer wrote: On 26 September 2017 at 22:14, Magnus Hagander <mailto:mag...@hagander.net>> wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Alvaro Hernandez mailto:a...@ongres.com>> wrote:     But what about earlier versions? Any cha