Hi,
Please suggest me on the following,
1. Is it better to configure autovacuum threshold at table level?
2. Is there any discussions in this forum which I can refer for
understanding vacuum/autovacuum?
Thanks in advance.
Rajan.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql
= 100);*
at table level.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
thanks for the reply, amul.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
postgres@Server2[DEV][backup] $ psql -c 'select * from pg_class where relname
= pg_toast_22345'
ERROR: column "pg_toast_16387" does not exist
LINE 1: select * from pg_class where relname = pg_toast_22345
-----
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-ar
Thanks a lot, Amul.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
ERT ON TABLE additional.chess TO student;
ERROR: permission denied for relation chess
learning=>
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
THanks for the response, Andrew.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
Andrew,
Another question, If the user student is not the owner of the
Schema(additional) and has only USAGE / no privileges, How come it is able
to modify permissions at schema level?
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
Thanks Andrew for the reply.
Based on the answer, Is there a way to provide read access on all tables(
*created by any user* ) to a Read Only user?
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
analyse_threshold set at 300, how can only analyse
run and vacuum does not?
This may be a stupid question. But any answer can help me understand.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
Thanks for the reply Amul.
Btw, No my table does not has any index.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
Is there any way that one of the Postgres Background process may go down?
meaning the process getting stopped?
For example, can the wal sender process alone stop working? If it does so,
which part of the logs I must check to proceed further.
-
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http
-
Regards
Rajan Pandey
esql % cat
> /usr/local/pgsql/data/postgresql.auto.conf
> cat: /usr/local/pgsql/data/postgresql.auto.conf: Permission denied
rajanx@b0be835adb74 postgresql % su cat
> /usr/local/pgsql/data/postgresql.auto.conf
> Password:
> su: Sorry
>
Please help! Thank you. :)
--
Regards
Rajan Pandey
ign server will do SCAN only, and the JOIN will happen at the upper
layer). In that case, using aliases in the remote queries seem redundant to
me.
Please correct me if I am missing something. Can we note pass
`bms_membership(foreignrel->relids) == BMS_MULTIPLE` instead?
--
Regards
Rajan Pandey
Software Developer, AWS
15 matches
Mail list logo