Re: logical replication seems broken

2021-02-12 Thread er
> On 02/12/2021 1:51 PM Amit Kapila wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 6:04 PM Erik Rijkers wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am seeing errors in replication in a test program that I've been running > > for years with very little change (since 2017, really [1]). Hi, Here is a test program.

Re: logical replication seems broken

2021-02-15 Thread er
> On 2021.02.15. 12:31 Amit Kapila wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:53 AM vignesh C wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 5:58 PM Erik Rijkers wrote: > > > I compiled just now a binary from HEAD, and a binary from HEAD+patch > > > HEAD is still broken; your patch rescues it, so yes, fixed. > >

Re: GROUP BY DISTINCT

2021-02-21 Thread er
> On 2021.02.21. 13:52 Vik Fearing wrote: > > Attached is a patch to implement this for PostgreSQL. > [] The changed line that gets stuffed into sql_features is missing a terminal value (to fill the 'comments' column). This line: '+T434 GROUP BY DISTINCT YES' (A tab at

is cfbot's apply aging intentional?

2021-03-06 Thread er
Hi, I was looking at the 'Catalog version access' patch, by Vik Fearing. I saw a succesful build by the cfbot but I could not build one here. Only then did I notice that the last apply of the patches by cfbot was on 3769e11 which is the 3rd march, some 10 commits ago. There have been no new

Re: is cfbot's apply aging intentional?

2021-03-07 Thread er
> On 2021.03.08. 01:30 Thomas Munro wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 3:21 AM Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 03:00:46PM +0100, e...@xs4all.nl wrote: > > > > > > I was looking at the 'Catalog version access' patch, by Vik Fearing. I > > > saw a succesful build by the cf

Re: pg_amcheck contrib application

2021-03-12 Thread er
> On 2021.03.12. 19:10 Robert Haas wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 11:41 AM Mark Dilger > wrote: > > In this next patch, your documentation patch has been applied, and the > > whole project has been relocated from contrib/pg_amcheck to > > src/bin/pg_amcheck. > > Committed that way wit

Re: 2021-02-11 release announcement draft

2021-02-08 Thread er
> On 02/08/2021 11:40 PM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > > Hi, > > Attached is a draft of the release announcement for the upcoming > 2021-02-11 cumulative update release. Please review for technical 'closes fixes' maybe better is: 'includes fixes' or 'closes bugs' 'also fixes over 80 bugs' Ma

Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace

2021-03-21 Thread er
> On 2021.03.20. 19:48 Gilles Darold wrote: > > This is a new version of the patch that now implements all the XQUERY > regexp functions as described in the standard, minus the differences of > PostgerSQL regular expression explain in [1]. > > The standard SQL describe functions like_regex(), o