Currently the 'figure' of a genetic algorithm is created with some kind
of 'ascii art'. The patch makes it a real figure.
Kind regards
Jürgen Purtz
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/geqo.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/geqo.sgml
index 5120dfbb42..5a52fb46db 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/geqo.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sg
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/datatype-datetime.html
Description:
In Table 8.13. Special Date/Time Inputs, the description for the special
values 'today', 'tomorrow' and 'yesterday' uses the word 'midnight' e.g. the
sp
On 2019-07-08 07:20, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> To support the didactic method of media changes we
> should promote graphics with a summarizing list at a prominent place in
> front of the manual.
This would make sense if we had fifty images spread evenly throughout
the documentation, or moreover, we
> On 8 Jul 2019, at 21:43, Peter Eisentraut
> wrote:
>
> On 2019-07-08 07:20, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
>> To support the didactic method of media changes we
>> should promote graphics with a summarizing list at a prominent place in
>> front of the manual.
>
> This would make sense if we had fifty
Daniel Gustafsson writes:
>> On 8 Jul 2019, at 21:43, Peter Eisentraut
>> wrote:
>> This would make sense if we had fifty images spread evenly throughout
>> the documentation, or moreover, we had an image for every topic. Then
>> learning by just flipping through the images would be interesting
> On 8 Jul 2019, at 22:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> let's wait till there's a
> meaningful number of figures and then reconsider whether there's use in
> a list of them. It's not like it will be any harder to make that change
> in a year or two than it is today.
In that case, let’s record this in the
On 7/8/19 4:21 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 8 Jul 2019, at 22:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> let's wait till there's a
>> meaningful number of figures and then reconsider whether there's use in
>> a list of them. It's not like it will be any harder to make that change
>> in a year or two than it
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 09:20:07PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/ddl-partitioning.html
> Description:
>
> In the documentation for Postgres 11 table partitioning, there is no me
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:37:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 09:20:07PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> In the documentation for Postgres 11 table partitioning, there is no mention
>> of the requirement that the Primary Key of a partitioned table must contain
>> th
Michael Paquier writes:
> Attached is an idea of patch for the documentation, using this
> wording:
> +
> +
> + When defining a primary key on a partitioned table, the primary
> + key column must be included in the partition key.
> +
> +
Isn't it the other way ar
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 7:59 PM Michael Paquier wrote:
> Attached is an idea of patch for the documentation, using this
> wording:
> +
> +
> + When defining a primary key on a partitioned table, the primary
> + key column must be included in the partition key.
> +
> +
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 10:07:59AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/datatype-datetime.html
> Description:
>
> In Table 8.13. Special Date/Time Inputs, the description for the speci
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 8:29 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 10:37:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 09:20:07PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >> In the documentation for Postgres 11 table partitioning, there is no
> mention
> >> of the requirem
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 08:12:18PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Reads a bit backward. How about:
>
> "As uniqueness can only be enforced within an individual partition when
> defining a primary key on a partitioned table all columns present in the
> partition key must also exist in the prima
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:10:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Isn't it the other way around, that the partition key column(s) must
> be
> included in the primary key? Maybe I'm confused, but it seems like
> we couldn't enforce PK uniqueness otherwise.
Yes you are right. The full column list of the
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 03:34:48PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Looking closely at the code in DefineIndex() (and as Rajkumar has
> mentioned upthread for unique constraints) this can happen for primary
> keys, unique constraints and exclusion constraints. So we had better
> mention all three o
16 matches
Mail list logo
