"System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, I have noticed that psql documentation mentions "system roles", however in all other parts of the docs, we use the term "default roles". Shouldn't we make this term more consistent and also add a link to the table describing those roles? Please see the attached. Thanks, -- Michael diff -

Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Jürgen Purtz
This inconsistency is part of the more general problem that we miss a chapter, where our basic terms like 'database', 'cluster', 'segment', 'catalog', 'schema', ... are explicitly defined. Kind regards Jürgen Purtz

25.3. Continuous Archiving : Unix examples with Windows-style variables %-$

2018-08-23 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/continuous-archiving.html Description: Most examples in "25.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)" use Unix commands and paths, but all variables are written as

fix word

2018-08-23 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/app-pg-ctl.html Description: ref/pg_ctl-ref.sgml 337,338c337,339 < The options should usually be surrounded by single or < double quotes to ensure that they are pass

Re: 25.3. Continuous Archiving : Unix examples with Windows-style variables %-$

2018-08-23 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
Hi, > On Aug 23, 2018, at 5:54 AM, PG Doc comments form > wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/continuous-archiving.html > Description: > > Most examples in "25.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-

Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 3:58 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have noticed that psql documentation mentions "system roles", however > in all other parts of the docs, we use the term "default roles". > Shouldn't we make this term more consistent and also add a link to the > table descr

Re: "System roles" mentioned in psql documentation

2018-08-23 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:53:35AM +0200, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > This inconsistency is part of the more general problem that we miss a > chapter, where our basic terms like 'database', 'cluster', 'segment', > 'catalog', 'schema', ... are explicitly defined. You may have a point here, not in the way

replication slots only need user with replication for creation

2018-08-23 Thread Martin Marques
Hi, Looking at privileges that a user would need now a days to create a cluster clone with repmgr we noticed that there's inaccurate information in the docs regarding the use of replication functions. I was able to test on 9.6 and 10 that a user with replication privileges can create and drop a r