[BUGS] 7.1beta1 JDBC Nested cursor problem

2000-12-09 Thread Stu Coates
Long(1)); ResultSet rs2=s2.executeQuery(); while(rs2.next()) { System.out.println(rs2.getLong(1) + " " + rs2.getString(2)); } rs2.close(); s.close();

[BUGS] 7.1beta1 JDBC bug?

2000-12-12 Thread Stu Coates
ones. Here's the stacktrace: Bad Long at org.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.getLong(ResultSet.java:284) at Test.go(Test.java:35) at Test.main(Test.java:15) I'm using the 7.0.2 JDBC drivers against the 7.1beta1 backend and everything seems to be working fine. Stu. -- Stu Coates Chelmsfo

[BUGS] JDBC buggy in 7.1beta3

2001-01-15 Thread Stu Coates
g on the lists [HACKERS mainly] from Peter for a while. Stu. -- Stu Coates Chelmsford, England U.K. ICQ:146628 http://www.stucoates.com/ __ FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Re: [BUGS] pg_dump failing on LinuxPPC

2001-02-23 Thread Stu Coates
n problem, and have discovered another. Attached is a short shell script that causes pg_dump to core dump whilst trying to dump a single, quite simple, table. Stu. -- Stu Coates Chelmsford, England U.K. http://www.StuCoates.com/ The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is pro

Lock Detection (was: [BUGS] pg_dump failing on LinuxPPC)

2001-02-26 Thread Stu Coates
Tom Lane wrote: > > Stu Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Anyway, I've sorted my obsolete version problem, and have discovered > > another. Attached is a short shell script that causes pg_dump to core > > dump whilst trying to dump a single, quite simple

Re: Lock Detection (was: [BUGS] pg_dump failing on LinuxPPC)

2001-02-26 Thread Stu Coates
Tom Lane wrote: > > Stu Coates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I come from an Oracle background where I can lock an item of data by > > performing a "SELECT FOR UPDATE" on the row. This is also implemented > > in PostgreSQL. A quite useful feature Orac