On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 6:10 AM, melzaiady wrote:
>
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n3332998/data1.jpg
>
> this picture of screen you can new sequence of value.
>
> now how can i slove this problem and this field dont start new squences in
> any time ?
It's pretty hard to tell what'
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:07 PM, frank wrote:
> More can be said, but why one wants to defend a defect is quite beyond me.
I guess the question is whether you want to solve your problem or
improve PostgreSQL. If you want to solve your immediate problem, the
advice given thus far is probably enou
Frank, thanks for educating me.
-- Korry
> -Original Message-
> From: Korry Douglas [mailto:korry.doug...@enterprisedb.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 2:34 PM
> To: frank
> Cc: 'Kevin Grittner'; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5816: index not used in f
The attached SQL causes a crash in 9.1. It appears to be caused by:
d1001a78ce612a16ea622b558f5fc2b68c45ab4c
The patch tries to copy all of the important data out of the child
context before it's reset; but it doesn't get everything. For instance,
grouping_planner() allocates subroot.glob->pa
Jeff Davis writes:
> The attached SQL causes a crash in 9.1. It appears to be caused by:
> d1001a78ce612a16ea622b558f5fc2b68c45ab4c
> The patch tries to copy all of the important data out of the child
> context before it's reset; but it doesn't get everything. For instance,
> grouping_planner
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5833
Logged by: chebeleu
Email address: chebe_ch...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.2
Operating system: win7 ultimate
Description:error
Details:
problem running post-instal. installation may not complete cor
