Joshua Tolley wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 02:12:22AM +0100, Richard Neill wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Sadly, I haven't the time (or expertise) to write
this myself. However, the feature would be really useful to have. I'd
certainly be willing to make a £200 payment or donation in return.
Hello
there is fix for bug Re: [BUGS] BUG #4907: stored procedures and changed tables
regards
Pavel Stehule
2009/7/10 Sergey Burladyan :
> Sergey Burladyan writes:
>
>> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>>
>> > Michael Tenenbaum wrote:
>> >
>> > > If I have a stored procedure that returns a set of recor
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 4917
Logged by: MIchael Blake
Email address: michael.bl...@webdynamic.com.au
PostgreSQL version: 8.3
Operating system: Linux [Ubuntu 9.04]
Description:NULLs Last as a Global Option
Details:
Could an option be
En, I have that damm problem sloved.
Are you using a Non-English Version of Windows? for example, JPN, CHS?
If you install your PSQL in an Asian-language windows, be sure that "local"
settings should be setted manualy to a supported language, English-USA is
good.
this is the errmsg when you're us
"MIchael Blake" writes:
> Could an option be added to postgresql.conf for default ordering of NULL
> values for different sort orders?
It could be, but whether it will be is an entirely different question.
I think by and large we've discovered that GUC variables that alter the
defined semantics o
