You may evaluate for yourself whether thse comments are actually worth
two cents, but:
I want to be able to tell whether my program is threading or using some
other useful-but-not-what-I'd-do-in-a-hurry tool.
I don't want to learn a thousand different details that are only there
to make sure I k
> sub slow_fn {
>my $tick = Timer.new(60, { print "..." });
>return slow_fn_imp @_;
> }
>
> Now if I could just get the compiler to not complain about that
> unused variable...
Maybe I'm being dense
Why not just
sub slow_fn {
Timer.new(1, { print "." });
return slow_fn_imp @_;
--- Dave Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dulcimer wrote:
> >>sub slow_fn {
> >> my $tick = Timer.new(60, { print "..." });
> >> return slow_fn_imp @_;
> >>}
> >>
> >>Now if I could just get the compiler to not compl
> > sub slow_fn {
> > my $pause = 1;
> > my $timer is last { .stop } = new Timer secs => $pause++,
> >reset => {$pause++},
> > code => {print "."};
> > return slow_fn_imp @_;
> > }
>
> I'm think
--- Dave Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Dulcimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > But exposing the object like that still bothers be: I shouldn't
> > > need the $tmp, nor the .new.
> >
> > I'm not so sure I agree with losing
