Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe continuations aren't so hard to serialize after all (well,
> excluding things like open filehandles and such). What's the status on
> the serialization subsystem?
*nobody* did answer my summary of different schemes.
> Luke
leo
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
compilers that are not in the main tree?
If people agree that it's a good idea I would like to submit the
following three liner:
---
If anyone has anything else, I have a page for this on the wiki.
What's not in the Parrot distribution?
http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/ParrotExtrasTOC
On Wednesday, Oct 8, 2003, at 11:38 Europe/Berlin, Jos Visser wrote:
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... (More bizarrely, it's actually *faster* to use Integer PMCs, which
> do MMD, than it is to use PerlInt PMCs, which don't do MMD. Go figure :)
I don't have that here (Athlon). They are equally fast. PerlInts have
some overhead due to possible type morp
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Robert Spier wrote:
> > Also, I'm working on OS X, so there is the library loading issue to be
> > solved too.
>
> 10.3 should make this easier, as it has dlopen emulation. (While not
> necessarily the perfect long-term solution, it at least lets you get
> things done.)
I've
Hi Jos,
Jos Visser writes:
> Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
> LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
> compilers that are not in the main tree?
Yeah, that's English. "Mightn't" is an archaic word which is sometimes
fun to use. Saying
Luke Palmer writes:
> Hi Jos,
>
> Jos Visser writes:
> > Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
> > LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
> > compilers that are not in the main tree?
>
> Yeah, that's English. "Mightn't" is an archaic word wh
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Luke Palmer writes:
> > Hi Jos,
> >
> > Jos Visser writes:
> > > Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
> > > LANGUAGES.STATUS also for maintaining track of parrot-generating
> > > compilers that are not in the main tree?
> >
> >
Luke Palmer writes:
> Amir Karger writes:
> >
> > I realized that I get in trouble when we get to the save/restore
> > commands. Those are supposed to save and restore the call stack,
which
> > includes the subroutine addresses & all the local variables in the
> > various routines. Am I right in
... are autogenrated sice some time. They delegete all but a few methods
to the refered PMC. [1]
But there are some pieces missing IMHO:
There is no means to get at the type of what the Ref refers too.
And we can't dereference the ref.
I'm thinking of 2 new ops:
deref Px, Py# set Px
I think if you have the op for dereferencing, you don't need the
additional ops for
getting the type of the reference. Maybe in a typed VM it would make
sense,
but in Parrot, everything is a reference to a PMC, and a PMC knows
what type it is.
At least that is my opinion. I think the deref op m
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ... (More bizarrely, it's actually *faster* to use Integer PMCs, which
> > do MMD, than it is to use PerlInt PMCs, which don't do MMD. Go figure :)
>
> I don't have that here (Athlon). They are equally fast.
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:57:54PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> While I'm having a heck of a time getting anything besides a connection to
> happen with it... I've checked in library/postgres.pasm. It's an
> interface to Posgres 7.3's libpq (the C interface to postgres) library.
On a vagely relat
Hi there!
I´m currently interrested a bit in howto write a just in time compilier (jit).
I searched a long time using google, and there are thousands of sites which explain
what a JIT stands for,
but not who it works.
Because of parrot has its own jit written from scratch, maybe you can po
I can point you to the docs:
docs/jit.pod
There should be an explanation of how it works.
Daniel.
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 13:16, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I´m currently interrested a bit in howto write a just in time compilier
> (jit). I searched a long time using googl
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> In an attempt to get a handle on what the status is of all the
> language compilers we have (in various states) I added
> a file called LANGUAGES.STATUS under parrot/languages
>
> Just read the file and it explains itself. Please, if you are
> the author
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> I don't have that here (Athlon). They are equally fast. PerlInts have
>> some overhead due to possible type morphing, though.
> Hrm. This system's showing the PerlInt at about 25% slower for a tight
> division
Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think if you have the op for dereferencing, you don't need the
> additional ops for
> getting the type of the reference.
Too true, thanks
leo
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:57:54PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > While I'm having a heck of a time getting anything besides a connection to
> > happen with it... I've checked in library/postgres.pasm. It's an
> > interface to Posgres 7.3's libpq (the C inte
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:57:54PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
While I'm having a heck of a time getting anything besides a connection to
happen with it... I've checked in library/postgres.pasm. It's an
interface to Posgres 7.3's libpq (the C interface to postgres) library.
On a
Yes, Dan says we should track all know compilers as well
as the last know Parrot version compatibility. I'll assume 0.0.11 for now
unless anyone tells me otherwise.
-Melvin
At 11:38 AM 10/8/2003 +0200, Jos Visser wrote:
Hi,
Mightn't it be (is this English by the way? :-) a good idea to use
LANGUA
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:17:32AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > There it goes again! That was *supposed* to be off-list!
> >
> > Well, now the entirety of the internals list can learn about English
> > grammar. Hoo-ray.
>
> You mean "American Grammar".
22 matches
Mail list logo
