[OAUTH-WG] Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Thank you Mike, for the accent on my first name ;-) More seriously, thanks for your reply and the update (and also for joining the telechat) Regards -éric From: Michael Jones Date: Thursday, 3 October 2024 at 19:41 To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) , The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metad...@i

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Explicit typing of SD-JWTs (was SD-JWT architecture feedback)

2024-10-03 Thread Brian Campbell
inline this time... On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 6:30 AM Dick Hardt wrote: > I read over the W3C issue but it is not clear to me why using "typ" is an > issue. I do see the issue that there is some possible name collision -- so > perhaps someone does not get their first choice? > Yes and there are s

[OAUTH-WG] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Pl

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Thank you for reviewing the document, Francesca. Would it be more appropriate to change the text to say the following? "Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG for approval, per Section 4.10 of RFC 8126."

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Thank you for reviewing the document, Éric. I'm glad that I brought a smile to your face with "`using fr might be sufficient in many contexts, rather than fr-CA or fr-FR". :-) Per the use of "HTTP/1.1" in the examples, RFC 9112 titled "HTTP/1.1" was published in June 2022 and hasn't been obsole

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.txt

2024-10-03 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol (OAUTH) WG of the IETF. Title: OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata Authors: Michael B. Jones Phil Hunt Aaron Parecki Name:draft-ie

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Murray, The IANA registration procedure language was updated in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me. It now says: "The IANA escalation process is followed when the Designated Expert

[OAUTH-WG] Re: John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Hi John, Per my reply to Murray, the IANA registration procedure language was updated in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me. It now says: "The IANA escalation process is followed when

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Francesca, Per my reply to Murray, the IANA registration procedure language was updated in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me. It now says: "The IANA escalation process is followed

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-11: (with COMMENT)

2024-10-03 Thread Michael Jones
Hi Éric, Per my reply to Murray, the IANA registration procedure language was updated in https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-12.html as discussed on today's IESG telechat and per Deb's suggestions to me. It now says: "The IANA escalation process is followed when