Hi Paul
Thanks for the review. Some comments below
On 17/02/16 15:26, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On 4 Feb 2016, at 17:14, Michael McMahon
mailto:michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
The following webrevs are for the initial implementation of JEP 110.
Most of it is in the jdk repository with
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 16:37, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
>
>> When building a request how does one set multiple values for a header?
>> setHeaders overwrites, does one used headers(…) instead?
>>
>
> headers(String, String)
> and headers(String ...) both accumulate headers
>
What headers would
On 18/02/16 16:06, Paul Sandoz wrote:
On 18 Feb 2016, at 16:37, Michael McMahon wrote:
When building a request how does one set multiple values for a header?
setHeaders overwrites, does one used headers(…) instead?
headers(String, String)
and headers(String ...) both accumulate headers
Wh
> On 18 Feb 2016, at 17:34, Michael McMahon
> wrote:
>
> On 18/02/16 16:06, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 16:37, Michael McMahon
>>> wrote:
>>>
When building a request how does one set multiple values for a header?
setHeaders overwrites, does one used headers(…) instea
Hi Michael,
A few comments, nothing severe.
Several properties are used in the implementation; is it significant
that some are sun.net and others java.net?
For the new package can we get away from using the "sun." prefix?
Exchange.java: 89 in cancel(), exchImpl may be null since it is not
