Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

2020-04-29 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
Hi, Thanks to everyone who provided feedback. I would like to propose a more detailed plan based on the everyone's comments. It seems like there was a strong preference to maintain the bug ID numbers, so this proposal tries to address that. TLDR; This proposes to maintain bug ID numbers by ov

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Switching from Bugzilla to Github Issues [UPDATED]

2020-04-29 Thread David Blaikie via lldb-dev
Generally sounds pretty good to me - only variation on the theme (& certainly imho dealer's choice at this point - if you/whoever ends up doing this doesn't like the sound of it, they shouldn't feel they have to do it this way) - maybe creating blank issues up to the current bugzilla PR number (& m

[lldb-dev] [Bug 45543] Backport D77000, "[lldb] [PECOFF] Only use PECallFrameInfo on the one supported architecture", to 10.0.1

2020-04-29 Thread via lldb-dev
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45543 Tom Stellard changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |jmole...@apple.com --- Comment #1 from Tom Stell

Re: [lldb-dev] LLDB problems on remote debugging

2020-04-29 Thread Rui Hong via lldb-dev
Hi LLDB devs, First I would like to express my appreciation and thanks to you all especially Greg Clayton and Ted Woodward! Your advice and guidance are quite useful for me! I've been working on other lldb problems and resume solving the "remote loading" issue now. I now fully understand the