[BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - NMI watchdog problem?

2008-02-02 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have a 1 GHz Coppermine PC with 512 MB RAM, and it is failing to boot with the nmi_watchdog=1 option. This kernel was rebuilt after doing a "make mrproper". The dmesg log follows: Linux version 2.6.24 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat

[BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - ATA problem?

2008-02-02 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have tried to boot a 2.6.24 kernel on my 1 GHz Coppermine / 512 MB RAM PC. (This is without the nmi_watchdog=1 option.) However, the ATA layer is failing to initialise: Linux version 2.6.24 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Feb 2 22:21:

snd-intel-hda: screaming IRQ with 3.5.3 kernel (HDMI)

2012-09-08 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have recently added a Radeon HD4670 to one of my older PCs, and have noticed that it has IRQ trouble when I try to enable the HDMI audio: irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.5.3 #2 Call Trace: [] ? __report_bad_irq+0x11/0x94

Re: [alsa-devel] snd-intel-hda: screaming IRQ with 3.5.3 kernel (HDMI)

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Rankin
- Original Message - > Did you try any workaround boot options such as irqpoll, pci=nocrs or > whatever? No, because wouldn't "irqpoll" have forced polling for every IRQ on the box? I need to avoid polling on the video card's IRQ because it noticeably impacts the responsiveness. (I assu

Re: [alsa-devel] snd-intel-hda: screaming IRQ with 3.5.3 kernel (HDMI)

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Rankin
- Original Message - > Did you try any workaround boot options such as irqpoll, pci=nocrs or > whatever? OK, the "irqpoll=1" option does help here. Although this message is obviously scary: Misrouted IRQ fixup and polling support enabled This may significantly impact system performance

Re: [alsa-devel] snd-intel-hda: screaming IRQ with 3.5.3 kernel (HDMI)

2012-09-10 Thread Chris Rankin
- Original Message - >  Did you try any workaround boot options such as irqpoll, pci=nocrs or >whatever? Actually, it turns out that booting with "irqpoll=1" simply means that this problem takes longer to happen: irq 17: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) Pid: 3347, c

[BUG][3.5.4] No keyboard without i8042_nokbd=1 parameter

2012-09-15 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have recently upgraded my oldest PC from 3.4.8 to 3.5.4, but was puzzled to discover that the keyboard no longer worked unless I also added the i8042_nokbd=1 boot parameter. It turns out that 3.4.8 didn't use the i8042 keyboard device anyway: >From 3.4.8: ... i8042 aux: probe of 00:07 f

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-16 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog enabled, by using the "acpi=noirq" option. (There does seem to be some unhappiness with bridge symlinks in sysfs, though.) Cheers, Chris __ Sent from Yah

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-16 Thread Chris Rankin
[Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!] Hi, I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog enabled, by using the "acpi=noirq" option. (There does seem to be some unhappiness with bridge symlinks in sysfs, though.) Cheers, Chris Linu

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-18 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and here it hangs, I assume? Oops, I think you have misunderstood. The hang happens if I *don't* specify acpi=noirq, whereas in this case I did. I have already reported the original hang under threads: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-18 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created > > WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one() > > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24.1 #1 > > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f > > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > > [] dump_stack+0x6c/0x72

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-18 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created > > > WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one() > > > Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24.1 #1 > > > [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f > > > [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > > > [] dump_

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-22 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg, > it seems that: > arch/x86/pci/legacy.c :: pci_legacy_init() > > tries to create already created "bridge" symlinks in 2.6.24. So we > discover the same devices twice? Can this be a reason for the hang? No, it can't be because it's *not* hangin

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - NMI watchdog problem?

2008-02-05 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:36:42 + (GMT) > Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a 1 GHz Coppermine PC with 512 MB RAM, and it is failing to boot > > with the > nmi_watchdog=1 > > option. This

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - NMI watchdog problem?

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It isn't clear (to me) where in this mess we disabled interrupts around the > set_cpus_allowed(). Chris, if this is repeatable it would be helpful to > set CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y which hopefully will get us a cleaner trace, Here you go, Cheers, Chri

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - NMI watchdog problem?

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it's a CONFIG_SMP=y kernel on a single-cpu machine? Correct. > It is unclear to me what clocksource (if any) your machine is using. The 2.6.23.x kernel uses the TSC: ... ACPI: Core revision 20070126 CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Coppermine) stepping 06

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24 refuses to boot - NMI watchdog problem?

2008-02-08 Thread Chris Rankin
And the same thing with 2.6.24.1. Cheers, Chris Linux version 2.6.24.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Feb 8 22:41:10 GMT 2008 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009f

Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-08 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I've just tried booting the 2.6.24.1 kernel, except without nmi_watchdog being enabled. It looks like there are IRQs still not being enabled. Cheers, Chris Linux version 2.6.24.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33)) #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Feb 8 22:41:10 GMT 2008

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 11:31:24PM +0000, Chris Rankin wrote: > > I've just tried booting the 2.6.24.1 kernel, except without > > nmi_watchdog being enabled. It looks like there are IRQs still not > > being enabled. &

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does any older kernel version work? 2.6.23? Newer ones? Everything up to and including 2.6.23.11 works fine. I never tried 2.6.23.{12,13,14,15}, but I expect they're fine too. > 2.6.24-git15? No idea. This box isn't really set up to use git. Anyway, I w

Re: Linux 2.6.24.1 - kernel does not boot; IRQ trouble?

2008-02-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > here is the snapshots in patch format: > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots Thanks, they're very pretty. But what exactly are they patches *between*? Cheers, Chris ___

[BUG] NMI watchdog alert with Linux 2.6.23.16

2008-02-24 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This is a strange NMI lockup - I have no idea what triggered it and so cannot possibly reproduce it. Requests to try (try "what"?) with 2.6.24.x would be similarly unhelpful. But anyway, here it is. A perfectly normal boot of 2.6.23.16 on a dual P4 Xeon (HT enabled, to give 4 logical CPUs)

Looking for maintainer of ENSONIQ SoundScape driver

2001-01-05 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have an ENSONIQ SoundScape PNP sound card, and I am noticing problems with it under linux-2.4.0-prerelease and linux-2.4.0. I have created 2 diffs which solve the most pressing problem (and sort a few messages out), but the driver seems to have deeper issues which I would like to discuss wi

Re: Looking for maintainer of ENSONIQ SoundScape driver

2001-01-05 Thread Chris Rankin
? "SoundScape PNP" : "SoundScape", hw_config->io_base, hw_config->irq, hw_config->dma, diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-vanilla/drivers/sound/audio.c linux-2.4.0/drivers/sound/audio.c --- linux-vanilla

Updated patch: module-usage for sound coprocessor device

2001-01-05 Thread Chris Rankin
missing #include + * Chris Rankin: Update the module-usage counter for the coprocessor */ #include @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ int bits; int dev_type = dev & 0x0f; int mode = translate_mode(file); + struct coproc_operations *coprocessor; dev = dev

ENSONIQ SoundScape PNP - small patch

2001-01-06 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have made further tweaks to the sscape module: - removed two redundant calls to release_region() - set the default MIDI volume(s?) to 100. These volume settings aren't accessible from any mixer I have. Therefore set them to "maximum" and use the volume control on the speaker instead. C

ISA-PNP /proc interface in 2.4.0 : 100% CPU!

2001-01-07 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have an old ISA-PNP soundcard whose driver doesn't currently use the ISA-PNP services. I have therefore been activating this card by writing to the /proc/isapnp interface. And in an idle moment, I tried an "auto" instruction: cat > /proc/isapnp << EOF card 0 ENS3081 dev 0 ENS auto EOF

PATCH for 2.4.0: assign ad1848 mixer operations to correct module

2001-01-08 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This patch fixes a problem that I was having with the ENSONIQ SoundScape mixer: basically, the mixer device was owned by the ad1848 module but was being deallocated when the sscape module was unloaded. This patch hands the mixer device to the sscape module instead so that the sscape module -c

Revised patch: Linux 2.4.0 ad1848 mixer ownership

2001-01-08 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This is a revised version of my ad1848 patch; instead of modifying the static structures, update the "owner" fields in the audio_devs[] and mixer_devs[] structures instead. Chris --- linux-vanilla/drivers/sound/ad1848.cFri Aug 11 16:26:43 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/sound/ad18

Re: PATCH for 2.4.0: assign ad1848 mixer operations to correct module

2001-01-08 Thread Chris Rankin
> > + > > + if (owner) > > + ad1848_mixer_operations.owner = owner; > > + > > if ((e = sound_install_mixer(MIXER_DRIVER_VERSION, > > dev_name, > > &ad1848_mixer_operations, > > > > BTW Isn't it ever-so-slightly dodgy modifying the static > > Very. > > > operations

Set ownership correctly for MPU401 synth operations

2001-01-09 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This patch makes the mpu401_synth_operations structure respect attach_mpu401()'s "owner" parameter. This should prevent more sound module from being accidentally unloaded. Cheers, Chris --- linux-vanilla/drivers/sound/mpu401.cFri Jan 5 23:14:08 2001 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3/drivers/sou

Request for Data: Anyone out there with an ENSONIQ SoundScape?

2001-01-10 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I am trying to add ISA-PNP support to the ENSONIQ SoundScape driver, but am suffering from a lack of examples: the only one I have is my own. Can anyone who is using the sscape.o driver to control their soundcard please email me with their working module parameters, plus the output from eithe

[PATCH] : Mark read-only ISA-PNP function parameters as "const"

2001-01-10 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This is an incredibly boring patch that just adds "const" to some of the ISA-PNP function prototypes. It compiles cleanly with gcc-2.95.2. Cheers, Chris --- linux-vanilla/include/linux/isapnp.hSun Dec 31 19:11:06 2000 +++ linux-2.4.0-ac3/include/linux/isapnp.h Wed Jan 10 17:08:

[PATCH]: Keep sound-module usage correct, even if audio_open fails

2001-01-10 Thread Chris Rankin
still generic * Horst von Brand: Add missing #include + * Chris Rankin: Update the module-usage counter for the coprocessor, + * and decrement the counters again if we cannot open + * the audio device. */ #include @@ -71,6 +74,8 @@ int bi

2.4.0-ac6 : Processes missing from "ps -ef" output

2001-01-11 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have been trying out 2.4.0-ac6, and the RedHat 6.1 init scripts really don't like it. (They liked 2.4.0-ac3 OK.) The visible symptom is that rc.sysinit now hangs, waiting for me to press 'i'. Once I do, it successfully hands over to the correct runlevel script, and I can go back to non-i

Linux-2.4.0-ac7: Unresolved symbol "queued_sectors" in scsi_mod.o

2001-01-12 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have just compiled 2.4.0-ac7, and this kernel boots up OK (no more processes missing from the output of "ps -ef", either). However, I am now getting an unresolved symbol "queued_sectors" in scsi_mod.o when I run depmod. I've done a "make mproper; ; make oldconfig; make dep" and none of the

[PATCH] : Sound module locking - uart401

2001-01-20 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I was going to save this patch until people (Alan) returned from linux.conf.au, but seeing as 2.4.0-ac10 has just been posted ... This patch makes the uart401 honour the module owner for MIDI and synth devices, and then moves the MIDI operations into the text section. Chris --- linux-2.4.0/

/dev/cpu/*/(cpuid, msr) unhappy as modules - OOPS!

2000-12-12 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have just compiled Linux 2.2.18 (UP) and Linux 2.4.0-test12 (SMP, devfs), and in each case I compiled the msr and cpuid drivers as modules. However, when I tried to read from the devices (using "cat"), I got oopses from both 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12. Neither the msr.o nor the cpuid.o modules

Re: /dev/cpu/*/(cpuid, msr) unhappy as modules - OOPS!

2000-12-14 Thread Chris Rankin
Devfs might explain the 2.4.0-test12 oopses, but it can't possibly explain the oops with 2.2.18. I don't use devfs with 2.2.18. Chris > Looks like a devfs problem; complain to the appropriate people. I refuse > to touch that particular devfs code. > > > I have just compiled Linux 2.2.18 (UP)

Re: /dev/cpu/*/(cpuid, msr) unhappy as modules - OOPS!

2000-12-14 Thread Chris Rankin
> Looks like a devfs problem; complain to the appropriate people. I refuse > to touch that particular devfs code. I've had a quick look at both the 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12 drivers for msr and cpuid, and I've noticed something curious. This is the comment from 2.4.0-test12, cpuid.c: /* * cpui

Re: /dev/cpu/*/(cpuid, msr) unhappy as modules - OOPS!

2000-12-14 Thread Chris Rankin
OK, I've just tried repeating this experiment on 2.2.18 (no devfs) and it oopsed this time, so there's obviously something else going on here. $ ksymoops -m /boot/System.map-2.2.18 < oops2.txt ksymoops 2.3.4 on i586 2.2.18. Options used -V (default) -k /proc/ksyms (default) -l /p

[PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster

2001-01-25 Thread Chris Rankin
Maybe other 16 bit cards in this code could behave * the same. + * Chris Rankin: Use spinlocks instead of CLI/STI */ +#include + #include "sound_config.h" #include "sb_mixer.h" @@ -43,23 +46,22 @@ if (mode == OPE

Re: [PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster

2001-01-26 Thread Chris Rankin
> spin_lock_irqsave() and save_flags()+cli() are identical on > uniprocessor builds. OK, so a UP-build proves nothing ... > cli() is quite putrid on SMP and should be shot. This much I understand ... > You can test your patch on uniprocessor hardware - just build > an SMP kernel and run it. I

[PATCH] (revised): spinlocks in SoundBlaster

2001-01-26 Thread Chris Rankin
this code could behave * the same. + * Chris Rankin: Use spinlocks instead of CLI/STI */ +#include + #include "sound_config.h" #include "sb_mixer.h" @@ -43,23 +46,22 @@ if (mode == OPEN_READ)

Re: [PATCH](s): Use spinlocks instead of STI/CLI in SoundBlaster

2001-01-27 Thread Chris Rankin
> > --- linux-2.4.0/drivers/sound/sb.h.orig Fri Jan 26 13:57:40 2001 > > +++ linux-2.4.0/drivers/sound/sb.h Fri Jan 26 13:58:42 2001 > > @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ > >void (*midi_input_intr) (int dev, unsigned char data); > >void *midi_irq_cookie; /* IRQ cookie for the

Linux-2.4.5, reiserfs, Oops!

2001-05-26 Thread Chris Rankin
Linux 2.4.5, SMP, devfs, < 1 GB memory, compiled with gcc-2.95.3 Hi, I have just experimented with using reiserfs; since I didn't have a hard disc partition free I used a 250MB Zip disc instead with my USB drive. I didn't do anything clever with parameters or anything; just "mkreisferfs /dev/sda

RE: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!

2001-05-26 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, Thanks for the patch; I successfully unmounted my reiserfs USB Zip 250 MB disc. However, the box then locked up hard when I unmounted an NFS mount and tried to switch to another virtual console. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!

2001-05-26 Thread Chris Rankin
> That's... interesting. With that patch changes to fs/super.c should make > no difference whatsoever. > > OK, can you reproduce NFS lockup on 2.4.5-pre5 (without that patch) > and on 2.4.5-pre3 (ditto)? > > There were NFS changes in -pre4 and -pre5 and umount ones in -pre6. The > latter need t

Re: Linux-2.4.5 and Reiserfs, oops!

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
ing. Chris My video card is a Matrox G400 AGP 32MB with TV-OUT, and I'm not using the frame buffer driver. > On Sat, 26 May 2001, Chris Rankin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the patch; I successfully unmounted my reiserfs USB Zip 250 > > MB disc. Howeve

Overkeen CDROM disk-change messages

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, It looks like my CDROM driver had a busy night last night ... ;-). This was with Linux 2.4.5, dual Pentium III, devfs, < 1GB memory. There was no CDROM in the drive, but I had kept the CD player running anyway. Cheers, Chris May 27 02:10:03 twopit kernel: hdc: ATAPI 32X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive,

Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
REF: Linux 2.4.5, 2.4.4, 2.4.3 (and probably earlier); devfs; SMP (dual PIII); < 1GB main memory Hi, Has anyone noticed their Linux box lock up hard (as in cannot even be pinged from the local network) when switching from a text vc to a vc running X? This has happened for me even

Re: Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, thanks for confirming this. But if it's Matrox's code (we are talking about the mga_hal_drv.o module for X, correct?) then the ball is in their court. Has anyone reported this to them so that they can fix it? Cheers, Chris > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 12:24:50AM +0200, Ben Twijnstra wrote: > >

Re: [2.6.23.1] PCI device locking up the computer when its module loads

2007-12-08 Thread Chris Rankin
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:43:16 +0100 (BST) Chris Rankin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > I have a Netgear MA301 PLX wireless networking adapter which wants to use > > > the hostap_plx > > > driver in Linux 2.6.23.1. This very same piece of

[2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-09 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I've recently been having trouble loading the hostap_plx 802.11b wireless networking driver, and this evening I managed to narrow the problem down to these lines of code by copying code from hostap_plx into a "test driver" until the test driver also locked the PC up: /* read CIS; it

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can you check if the attr_mem is properly ioremap'd ? > (probably with ioremap_nocache) Can you elaborate, please? I am not familiar with these I/O primitives. > I wonder if there's anything else in that area as well.. So I should check /proc/iom

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not a fix, but if you load the module with ignore_cis = 1, it should work. Well, if the I/O memory mapping is broken then wouldn't that just move the problem down to the next attempt to access it? Cheers, Chris

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-09 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the memory you feed to readl() and co isnt the actual PCI resource; > you need to use ioremap() on the PCI resource to get a pointer that you can > then feed to > readl() I gathered that much, and there is indeed a call to ioremap() in the cod

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-10 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wonder if there's anything else in that area as well.. This is what /proc/iomem contains: -0009f7ff : System RAM 0009f800-0009 : reserved 000a-000b : Video RAM area 000c-000cbfff : Video ROM 000e4000-000e : Adapte

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-12 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might be interesting to see what value of `i' is causing it to fall over. I tried unrolling the loop, but a single byte read for i = 0 is enough to lock things up. > Did any earlier version of the 2.6 kernel work OK? Unfortunately, I don't know.

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-12 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hm. Could be some platform thing. Strange. It might be worth checking > around that ioremap, make sure that the value which it returned is the one > which is being used in the function-which-hangs, etc. OK, not difficult to try. (This is x86, BTW.)

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-12 Thread Chris Rankin
-- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hostap_plx.c first appeared in 2.6.14. > Just a thought: How far back will I be able to compile kernels correctly with gcc 4.1.2? Specifically: gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33) Cheers, Chris

[BUG] The return of the sysfs oops

2007-10-09 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, Do you remember that oops in sysfs a few versions ago? (Kernel bug 8198) Well, it's bck in 2.6.22.9... Cheers, Chris _ Do not compromise. Get unlimited storage and first rate spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://uk.mail.ya

Re: [BUG] The return of the sysfs oops

2007-10-10 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This isn't really related to sysfs. It seems module count was too low > and went away while there still were holders. What were you doing when > it happened? Can you reproduce it? I haven't tried reproducing it, but all I was doing was selecting the Au

Re: [2.6.23.9] hostap_plx locks up PC when reading PCI I/O memory

2007-12-27 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did any earlier version of the 2.6 kernel work OK? Kernel 2.6.14 does not work any better than 2.6.23.x, and my F8 userspace environment rejects a 2.4.35 kernel. I will try a 2.6.0 kernel next, but have noticed tonight that a stock Fedora kernel

[BUG] NMI Watchdog alert with Linux 2.6.23.11

2007-12-16 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, My dual Xeon P4 (HT enabled), 2 GB RAM box crashed last night while playing World of Warcraft under Wine (Mesa 7.1, Radeon 9550 card). This is what appeared on the serial console. Cheers, Chris BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, eip c0102aac, registers: CPU:3 EIP:0060:[]

[PATCH] Partial devfs support for raw IO devices

2001-06-16 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I hacked together this quick patch to make the "master" raw IO device appear in devfs. It seems odd that I need *both* devfs_register...() calls but the first one only seems to make the entry appear in /proc/devices. The logical corollary to this patch is to make raw IO devices magically appe

[PATCH] - Linux 2.4.5; devfs support for /dev/raw

2001-06-19 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have written this patch so that /dev/raw now appears in a devfs filesystem. I haven't tried to support the /dev/rawN devices because I'm not sure that it would be worthwhile. (Seeing as you need to bind them by hand manually anyway.) Cheers, Chris --- linux-2.4.5/drivers/char/raw.c.orig S

[OOPS] NMI lockup detected with CFQ, v2.6.10

2005-01-15 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, My dual Xeon P4 (with HT, 1 GB RAM) has just oopsed on shutdown, due to a lockup in the CFQ scheduler (I think). The compiler was gcc-3.4.3. NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU2, eip c026d86d, registers: Modules linked in: snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_usb_audio snd_usb_lib snd_intel8x0 snd_s

[OOPS] 2.6.11 - NMI lockup with CFQ scheduler

2005-03-27 Thread Chris Rankin
[gcc-3.4.3, Linux-2.6.11-SMP, Dual P4 Xeon with HT enabled] Hi, My Linux 2.6.11 box oopsed when I tried to logout. I have switched to using the anticipatory scheduler instead. Cheers, Chris NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU1, eip c0275cc7, registers: Modules linked in: snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_

Re: [OOPS] 2.6.11 - NMI lockup with CFQ scheduler

2005-03-29 Thread Chris Rankin
I have one IDE hard disc, but I was using a USB memory stick at one point. (Notice the usb-storage and vfat modules in my list.) Could that be the troublesome SCSI device? --- Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27 2005, Chris Rankin wrote: > > [gcc-3.4.3, Linux-2

Re: [OOPS] 2.6.11 - NMI lockup with CFQ scheduler

2005-03-29 Thread Chris Rankin
>> > I have one IDE hard disc, but I was using a USB memory stick at one > > point. (Notice the usb-storage and vfat modules in my list.) Could > > that be the troublesome SCSI device? --- Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it probably is. What happens is that you insert the stick and do

Re: Kernel oops with udevd process

2007-11-19 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Raman Gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just found this bug: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8198 > > This seems to indicate the problem was resolved in 2.6.21.2. > > However, I also found this, where you reported the problem was back in > 2.6.22.9 (which is what I am curr

Re: [2.6.23.1] PCI device locking up the computer when its module loads

2007-10-29 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This same sort of problem was just fixed for iwl4965. The fix for that > was to disable device interrupts until everything the driver needed > (including interrupt handler) was set up and ready before re-enabling > them, I think. See the thread "iwl49

[BUG] Linux 2.6.22 - Atomic counter underflow in NFS

2007-08-01 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I am running a 2.6.22 kernel on a dual P4 Xeon (HT enabled) with 2 GB RAM, and I have just found this BUG in my dmesg log: nfsd: last server has exited nfsd: unexporting all filesystems BUG: atomic counter underflow at: [] kref_put+0x66/0x84 [] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0xb8/0x12d [] sysfs_ha

Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.22 - Atomic counter underflow in NFS

2007-08-01 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I expect this is easy to reproduce at will (when shutting down nfs > services, probably), right? I'm not sure about the "at will" part because this is the first time I've seen it since 2.6.22 was released. However, I was upgrading my Fedora 7 nfs-uti

[2.6.23.1] PCI device locking up the computer when its module loads

2007-10-22 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have a Netgear MA301 PLX wireless networking adapter which wants to use the hostap_plx driver in Linux 2.6.23.1. This very same piece of hardware works fine in an old(!) P120 machine running 2.4.33, but makes the 2.6.23.1 kernel freeze as soon as the pci_enable_device() function is called

[BUG] Sleeping function called from invalid context (2.6.18.6)

2007-01-20 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have been testing my wireless zd1211rw driver with kismet, but have noticed my logs filling up with these messages instead: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:86 in_atomic():0, irqs_disabled():1 [] mutex_lock+0x12/0x1a [] netdev_run_todo+0x10/0x1f1 [] d

Re: [BUG] Sleeping function called from invalid context (2.6.18.6)

2007-01-20 Thread Chris Rankin
This is for a 2.6.18.6 UP-preempt kernel compiled with gcc-4.1.1, BTW. Cheers, Chris ___ The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyou

[PATCH] Register the bus, vendor and product IDs for dvb-usb remote device

2007-01-20 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This patch writes the USB vendor and product IDs into the /sys/class/input/inputX/id/ files, so that udev can find them. A rule like this does the trick for me: KERNEL="event*", SYSFS{../id/vendor}=="2040", SYSFS{../id/product}=="9301", SYMLINK+="input/dvb-remote" --- linux-2.6.18/drivers/m

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
> But 2.6.18.x must be over now, because the -stable team didn't release a > 2.6.18.7 to match > 2.6.19.2, and all of 2.6.x except for 2.6.19.2 has that weird file corruption > bug . Personally, I dumped 2.6.19.x like a hot coal as soon as I tripped over this bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/sh

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
> That's surely no reason to dump 2.6.19.x, you'll find the occasional > such report on every(?) release since page mapcount went into 2.6.7. This was the only time I've seen it, before or since. > Oftentimes it's bad RAM (try memtest86) There is nothing wrong with my RAM. I tested it quite exte

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
> > But MY kernel is clearly untainted. > > So what other explanation is there apart from a kernel bug? > If it's me you're asking: I don't know (overheating, cosmic rays, ...) I suppose what I'm *really* asking is what the basis is for assuming that this *isn't* a kernel bug and can therefore b

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All I'm claiming is that it's no more a reason to avoid 2.6.19* > than to avoid any other release (the kernels before 2.6.7 happened > to have no such check, but that doesn't imply they were any safer). There is *one* reason to avoid 2.6.19.x: it has a

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Mark Rustad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, do you have ECC memory? If not, it is at least possible that > that the solar flares that occurred last month may have affected your > system. I am going to assume that you are being facaetious, because it would be the rarified pinnacle of su

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A one off non repeatable error experienced by two people out of the > millions using it does fit the cosmic ray description quite well. Actually it's "unrepeated", not "non repeatable". And that's because I switched back to 2.6.18.x immediately since I no lon

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-24 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Mark Rustad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly. Halting use of a version of the kernel based on a single > incident provides no insight to the source of the problem. It could > be anything... There is a world of difference between a polite request for more information (although I gave y

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-25 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Mark Rustad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We'll never know if any of these things were correlated with the > solar flares because they all seem to be one-off failures. I do find > it interesting though. Our systems seem to be doing statistically > better this month. What do you think? Per

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-25 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At the moment, you have a problem that nobody recognises. If you're not > willing to test if the problem happens repeatably, (you appear to > have had one failure and immediately reverted to an old kernel), who > do you think will be able to fix it? Thi

Kernel warning from Matrox Framebuffer in 2.6.20.1

2007-02-24 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I have just booted 2.6.20.1 on my Pentium 3 machine, which has a G400 MAX graphics card. This machine uses the Matrox framebuffer and TV-OUT modules, and I have found these warnings in the kernel log: **WARNING** I2C adapter driver [DDC:fb0 #0] forgot to specify physical device; fix it! **

[BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-02-25 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, This looks like a memory fault to me; are those 0x6b characters "slab poisoning"? This is the dual P4 Xeon / 2 GB RAM machine, and I'm guessing that udevd has just loaded snd_rtctimer (because that's the module at the top of the list): BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual

Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-02-26 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you have any of the preceding kernel log messages? > or can you get them? Unfortunately, there was none. I posted everything there was. Race condition, perhaps? Cheers, Chris ___

Re: [Alsa-devel] [BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-02-27 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Takashi Iwai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > snd_timer_global_register() itself doesn't issue any tasklet, so it > shouldn't be needed. Hmm, this bug looks interesting: http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0702.3/0514.html Yes, my machine *is* a dual P4 with HT enabled... Cheers, Chr

Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-02-27 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Call Trace: > > [] sysfs_release+0x2d/0x4c > > [] __fput+0x96/0x13c > > So udevd is closing a sysfs attribute file but the pointer passed to > module_put is bogus. Looks like the sysfs dentry was already taken > down by release_sysfs_dirent(). Can

Re: [Alsa-devel] [BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-03-01 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, but the oops looks more like a reference counting problem with > sysfs dentries. No harm in trying out the patch or reproducing without > CONFIG_SCHED_SMT though. > Nope, no difference. Again, this happened while trying to start World of Warcra

Re: [Alsa-devel] [BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-03-01 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please apply this patch to your kernel and try to reproduce: Ta-DA BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6d6b printing eip: c0130113 *pde = Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP last sysfs file: /clas

Re: [BUG] Linux 2.6.20.1 - unable to handle kernel paging request - accessing freed memory?

2007-03-01 Thread Chris Rankin
Oh yes - I'd better mention what my Ethernet devices are: $ cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive| Transmit face |bytespackets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 820705 1

Re: 2.6.18-stable release plans?

2007-01-26 Thread Chris Rankin
--- Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't, but Dave Jones had a similar problem earlier this month, > archived at http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0701.0/1822.html > which I think is a followup from > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg105370.html > - a

Re: System crash after "No irq handler for vector" linux 2.6.19

2007-02-01 Thread Chris Rankin
> Ok. I've finally figured out what is going on. The code is race free but the > programmer was an > idiot. Hi, Could this IRQ problem account for this bug as well, please? Or is yours strictly a 2.6.19.x issue? http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7847 I have a dual P4 Xeon box (HT ena

[BUG] Linux 2.6.19.1 - "page_mapcount(page) went negative (-1)"

2006-12-18 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I just tripped this bug when compiling xine-lib on 2.6.19.1. This is on a dual P4, SMP and HT, 2 GB RAM, compiled with gcc-4.1.1. Cheers, Chris Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) page->flags = 14 page->count = 0 page->mapping = [ cut here ]

[BUG] Linux 2.6.21.5 - Radeon NMI lockup

2007-06-22 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I experienced this BUG while playing World of Warcraft with a Radeon 9200 AGPx8 video card and FC7: BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU3, eip c019f98f, registers: Modules linked in: snd_rtctimer snd_seq_midi radeon drm cpufreq_ondemand p4_clockmod speedstep_lib nfsd exportfs autofs4 ee

  1   2   >