Hi all,
I've just deployed a new feature for LAVA: the ability to filter and
subscribe (by email) to test results. You can see, define and
subscribe to filters at:
https://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/filters/
I've made some effort to make the interface understandable, so I don't
want
On 3 September 2012 08:12, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just deployed a new feature for LAVA: the ability to filter and
> subscribe (by email) to test results. You can see, define and
> subscribe to filters at:
>
> https://validation.linaro.org/lava-server/filters/
404 Not
On 3 Sep 2012, at 11:18, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On 3 September 2012 08:12, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just deployed a new feature for LAVA: the ability to filter and
>> subscribe (by email) to test results. You can see, define and
>> subscribe to filters at:
>>
>>h
Hi Andrey,
Below is pull request for v7 of MP work. Following are the main changes:
- Based on v3.6-rc3
- per-task-load-average-v3
- applied ARM-Add-HMP-scheduling-support-for-ARM-architecture to
task-placement-v1 branch
- applied Tixy's patch from fast-slow-cpu-dt-v1 to
task
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 01:28 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e831b04405152d59784ab,
> >> cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idl
Hi,
When trying to checkout the kernel used for Linaro 12.07 on Pandaboard for
Android, the required kernel revision does no longer exist in the remote
git repository (it was there up till about ~2 weeks ago).
Here is what I'm doing, based on the instructions in the Linaro 12.07 build
for
Androi
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46:02PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The tegra3 and big.LITTLE architecture have different cpu latencies.
> This API allows to specify a different cpu latency for a specific cpu.
>
> With the previous patches, we use the per cpuidle device states pointer,
> this functi
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 16:07 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Below is pull request for v7 of MP work. Following are the main changes:
> - Based on v3.6-rc3
> - per-task-load-average-v3
> - applied ARM-Add-HMP-scheduling-support-for-ARM-architecture to
> task-placement-
On 09/03/2012 05:26 PM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 16:07 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi Andrey,
Below is pull request for v7 of MP work. Following are the main changes:
Merged into llct-20120903.0.
- Based on v3.6-rc3
- per-task-load-average-v3
- applied
This patchset updates devfreq core to add support for devices
which can idle. When device idleness is detected perhaps
through runtime-pm, need some mechanism to suspend devfreq
load monitoring and resume when device is back online.
patch 1 introduce core design changes - per device work, decouple
Add devfreq suspend/resume apis for devfreq users. This patch
supports suspend and resume of devfreq load monitoring, required
for devices which can idle.
Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat
---
drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 26 ++
drivers/devfreq/governor.h
Prepare devfreq core framework to support devices which
can idle. When device idleness is detected perhaps through
runtime-pm, need some mechanism to suspend devfreq load
monitoring and resume back when device is online. Present
code continues monitoring unless device is removed from
devfreq core.
Devfreq returns governor predicted frequency as current
frequency via sysfs interface. But device may not support
all frequencies that governor predicts. Its driver
responsibility to maintain current frequency at which device
is operating. Add a callback in device profile to fix this.
Also add a ne
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patch adds a pointer to the cpuidle_state array in the cpuidle_device
> structure. When the cpuidle_device is initialized, the pointer is assigned
> from the driver's cpuidle states array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano
> -
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:05:11PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 07/27/2012 01:28 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> Since commit 46bcfad7a819bd17ac4e8
On 09/03/2012 03:22 PM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:46:02PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The tegra3 and big.LITTLE architecture have different cpu latencies.
>> This API allows to specify a different cpu latency for a specific cpu.
>>
>> With the previous patches, we u
Dave Pigott writes:
> On 3 Sep 2012, at 11:18, Fathi Boudra wrote:
>
>> On 3 September 2012 08:12, Michael Hudson-Doyle
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've just deployed a new feature for LAVA: the ability to filter and
>>> subscribe (by email) to test results. You can see, define and
>>> subsc
Hey,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Andy Green wrote:
> Hi -
>
> We've been getting some good mileage from the llct-based tilt-3.4 history
> tree the last months.
>
> However a couple of points have been raised by TI which really boil down to
> being about the deal with llct post-release. We k
Hi Andy,
I am using Panda board with linaro Nano filesystem over SDHC card. When i
issue "reboot" command from prompt, it hangs:
root@linaro-nano:/# reboot
Broadcast message from root@linaro-nano
(/dev/ttyO2) at 4:44 ...
The system is going down for reboot NOW!
root@linaro-nano:/# [ 6
On 31 August 2012 20:45, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 18:19 +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I want to set up the power probe only without any other streamline
> > functions, can I make it?
> > It seems that the IP Address in the Capture Options window must be
> fi
On 31 August 2012 22:47, Paul Larson wrote:
> There's documentation here:
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0482h/ch13.html
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0482h/ch13.html
>
> And there's a video of the process here:
> http://www.you
21 matches
Mail list logo
