Alex Lockwood kirjoitti 4.1.2019 klo 4.14:
> I know this is solidly within in realm of minor complaints, but I
> wonder, is there anything "easy" that can be done about this?
>
> https://misc.c4757p.com/fuzzy-wires.png
>
> A simple answer, I think, is to give eeschema and pcbnew separate
> settin
On 1/4/19 6:18 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
> On 04/01/2019 18:51, Brian Piccioni wrote:
>> I am still keen to attempt to incorporate geographical component annotation
>> into KiCad. In general, it is preferable for component annotation to be done
>> relative to the PCB and in some logical order
On 1/3/19 11:24 PM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03.01.19 19:06, José Ignacio wrote:
>
>> I
>> think useful comments to the proposed format should see beyond the
>> actual low level representation of the data and talk about the overall
>> model being used to store it.
>
> tl;dr: That's a se
Hi Mario,
On 1/4/19 10:53 AM, Mário Luzeiro wrote:
>> Now if you create a unique part number for every
>> resistance value, tolerance, temperature coefficient, manufacturer, etc.
>> that would be tens if not hundreds of thousands of unique part numbers.
>
> I know my intervention may be a bit off
My ERC Proposal was more like a: we should at least think about it a bit
instead of writing the pin type near style and number/name. We can
specify ERC hints in a future-proof way without extending the current
implementation. Like:
(erc_hints (pin_type power_in))
This would allow us to specify ne
Wayne
My prior approach was to
1) verify that the was/is change list produces no errors on the schematic
(since it is derived from the PCB there can be discrepancies).
2) if there were no errors, update the PCB and schematic reference designations
3) update the netlist with the new reference des
I've pushed your patch. Thanks for tracking this down John!
Best-
Seth
Am 2018-12-23 16:32, schrieb John Beard:
Hi,
It seems "make clean" might be the trigger here. The target for the
libeval grammar is done with CMake add_custom_command with an OUTPUT.
This means the output file will be clea
Hi John-
Patch 0002 does not apply cleanly to qa/CMakeLists.txt even after
applying 0001
-S
Am 2019-01-04 09:36, schrieb John Beard:
Hi,
I have worked out how to do unit tests of the Pcbnew code.
The first example test is a pretty unexciting one about the import
plugin manager (which is wh
Is there any reason not to start the 5.1 string freeze? If so, please
let me know. Otherwise we can officially freeze the strings so our
translators can start work towards the 5.1 stable release.
Cheers,
Wayne
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/
Am 2019-01-05 16:21, schrieb Wayne Stambaugh:
Is there any reason not to start the 5.1 string freeze? If so, please
let me know. Otherwise we can officially freeze the strings so our
translators can start work towards the 5.1 stable release.
For 5.0, the string freeze was RC2. Are we tagging
I’m not aware of anything pending.
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 5 Jan 2019, at 21:21, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> Is there any reason not to start the 5.1 string freeze? If so, please
> let me know. Otherwise we can officially freeze the strings so our
> translators can start work towards the 5.1 stabl
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 4:23 PM Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Patch 0002 does not apply cleanly to qa/CMakeLists.txt even after
> applying 0001
Hmm, that's odd: I can apply this with "git am 0002". I'm applying
on top of 69fc301bf. Where are you applying it to? Do you still have
the triangulation t
I just did git am 000* and it worked fine for me, on master.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 01:20, John Beard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 4:23 PM Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
> > Patch 0002 does not apply cleanly to qa/CMakeLists.txt even after
> > applying 0001
>
> Hmm, that's odd: I can apply this with
Hi,
Here is a really silly (since it's in legacy code) small patch for
some unused code I was alerted to by Clang. But might as well get it
off my patch stack!
Cheers,
John
From 3f7aaef50dc0cc51d995450c6c6a7c5fca85f8d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Beard
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 14:20:47 +00
With the amount of data that KiCad handles performance of particular parser
has minuscule impact. File IO delays would thwart any processing time.
What Simon talked about is as he said a separate discussion and is
orthogonal to the decision of how to define data model and what file format
to use. A
15 matches
Mail list logo
