On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
> signed-off is not required. Richard is in agreement with that. Of course
> if you feel it is warranted and useful you can use it the other projects,
> but for ORM I am making the decision to not complicate these processes
> needlessly.
I
On 9 August 2017 at 09:21, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>
>> signed-off is not required. Richard is in agreement with that. Of course
>> if you feel it is warranted and useful you can use it the other projects,
>> but for ORM I am making the dec
I agree. The whole signed-off thing just sounded
just-a-little-less-annoying than signing a CLA. And it misses covering
non-PR contributions - we (committer) could do the signed-off as we apply
the patch, but that defeats the whole intent.
So yes, I was glad that Richard saw this the same way.
