[hibernate-dev] Hibernate Developer Weekly IRC Meeting - 12/20

2011-12-20 Thread Steve Ebersole
[09:39] Meeting ended Tue Dec 20 15:39:10 2011 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) [09:39] Minutes: http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2011/hibernate-dev.2011-12-20-14.08.html [09:39] Minutes (text): http://transcripts

[hibernate-dev] JIRA issue status - Closed v. Resolved

2011-12-20 Thread Steve Ebersole
We seem to have a few different understandings of Closed versus Resolved as a status. We should come to a consensus. According to Atlassian... * Resolved : A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed. * Closed :

[hibernate-dev] Hibernate is 10

2011-12-20 Thread Christian Bauer
Not sure everyone noticed: http://sourceforge.net/projects/hibernate/ Registered: 2001-11-25 Congratulations :) ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hibernate is 10

2011-12-20 Thread Emmanuel Bernard
Still waiting for my first gray hairs ;) On 20 déc. 2011, at 18:20, Christian Bauer wrote: > Not sure everyone noticed: http://sourceforge.net/projects/hibernate/ > > Registered: 2001-11-25 > > Congratulations :) > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > h

Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA issue status - Closed v. Resolved

2011-12-20 Thread John Verhaeg
On Dec 20, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > Which brings us to... do we really want to not allow Closed issues to be > reopened? I mean actually remove the transition? Or do we just want to > say that as a standard procedure we do not reopen Closed issues? I think we should not all

[hibernate-dev] JIRA Pull Request Workflow

2011-12-20 Thread Steve Ebersole
During today's IRC meeting we discussed some changes to JIRA to better deal with GitHub pull requests. The first change was to introduce a new issue field for holding a list of pull request urls. There is also a new issue status named "Pull Request Pending". Currently it is not "hooked in" bec

Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA issue status - Closed v. Resolved

2011-12-20 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
Hi On Dec 20, 2011, at 18:17, Steve Ebersole wrote: > According to Atlassian... > * Resolved : A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting > verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are > closed. > * Closed : The issue is considered finished, the resolution is cor

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hibernate is 10

2011-12-20 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
congratulations indeed :-) On Dec 20, 2011, at 18:20, Christian Bauer wrote: > Not sure everyone noticed: http://sourceforge.net/projects/hibernate/ > > Registered: 2001-11-25 > > Congratulations :) ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists

Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA issue status - Closed v. Resolved

2011-12-20 Thread Sanne Grinovero
I agree as well on interpreting "Closed" as "forever"; AFAIR new issues can be linked to the older closed ones so that while a comment might not be allowed, it's still possible to point to "follow ups" in case of need. I'm not sure however about enforcing this, but I'm not against it. I'd prefer i

Re: [hibernate-dev] Hibernate is 10

2011-12-20 Thread Sanne Grinovero
10 years and it's still not finished! "The software isn't finished until the last user is dead. " Sidney Markowitz But it's damn good ;) Congratulations all! Sanne On 20 December 2011 20:28, Hardy Ferentschik wrote: > congratulations indeed :-) > > > On Dec 20, 2011, at 18:20, Chr

Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA issue status - Closed v. Resolved

2011-12-20 Thread Gail Badner
Comments below... - Original Message - > From: "Sanne Grinovero" > To: "Hardy Ferentschik" > Cc: hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:55:38 PM > Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] JIRA issue status - Closed v. Resolved > > I agree as well on interpreting "Closed