Hi,
Position restraints do not allow me to do what I want.
For instance, I want to allow the system to freely explore the conformational
space within a certain RMSD range, but not evolve beyond a specified RMSD cutoff.
Another application would be to push the system conformation away from the
r
Sam Moors wrote:
Hi,
Position restraints do not allow me to do what I want.
For instance, I want to allow the system to freely explore the
conformational space within a certain RMSD range, but not evolve beyond
a specified RMSD cutoff.
Another application would be to push the system conformati
Another possibility is to patch gromacs with PLUMED
http://merlino.mi.infn.it/~plumed/PLUMED/Home.html
Here RMSD (and derivatives) is already implemented and you can
easily restraint your MD simulation within a certain RMSD cutoff
from a reference structure.
Massimiliano
On May 19, 2009, at
Hi,
You can also use essential dynamics sampling.
Ran.
David van der Spoel wrote:
> Sam Moors wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Position restraints do not allow me to do what I want.
>> For instance, I want to allow the system to freely explore the
>> conformational space within a certain RMSD range, but not ev
Hi all
I am looking for a way to import forces from a gromacs run into VMD for
analysis. From a mdrun rerun I have forces in a .trr file but VMD only
reads the coordinates. Can you think of any way to get the forces into vmd
instead of the coordinates?
Thank you!
Matteus
Hi David,
Thanks for your suggestion.
However, I have a problem with the use of distance restraints in gromacs. As
described in the manual a restraint potential is applied to each pair of atoms
separately. Instead, I would like the restraint potential to depend on the
root mean square of pair d
Hi,
Sorry to pull a self-publicity plug, but you could use our MDDriver
library [1] to implement whatever constraint you want as long as it
can be calculated from the system positions and translates into
forces to be applied to your system.
Such a 'scripting' application is very briefly hinted
Hello,
I have a DNA-Zinc finger complex. What are the suitable forcefields
for that type of complexes (the zinc ion is coordinated to 4
deprotonated cysteines)?
I need to do some molecular minimization and dynamics including the
nucelic acid sequence.
Looking for some help.
Thank you.
Ne
Dear all
I want remove water molecules from hydrophobic core of
lipid by using script Keepbyz.pl by (chris neale) . I want to know basis
of deciding uprez and lowrez variables . I mean to say how can I decide
which value of uprez and lowrez is suitable for my system protein emb
nitu sharma wrote:
Dear all
I want remove water molecules from hydrophobic core of
lipid by using script Keepbyz.pl by (chris neale) . I want to know
basis of deciding uprez and lowrez variables . I mean to say how can I
decide which value of uprez and lowrez is suitable
Nehme El Hachem wrote:
Hello,
I have a DNA-Zinc finger complex. What are the suitable forcefields for
that type of complexes (the zinc ion is coordinated to 4 deprotonated
cysteines)?
The first step is probably to search in the literature for anything similar.
Has anyone attempted such wo
Hi,
Have a look at
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Parameterization
and
http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Exotic_Species
Next to that, also consider that you are talking about a site with -2
formal charge (ZnS4)2-. How likely is that? From QM studies, it seems
much more likely that there are 1
Dear all,
I want to study "glycolipid-protein" interaction using united atom
GROMACS force field.
For lipid simulation we need lipid.itp, which is a mixture of lipid (
Berger) and GROMOS (ffgmxnb) parameters.
Matteus Lindgren wrote:
Hi all
I am looking for a way to import forces from a gromacs run into VMD for
analysis. From a mdrun –rerun I have forces in a .trr file but VMD only
reads the coordinates. Can you think of any way to get the forces into
vmd instead of the coordinates?
If VMD wil
Dear gmx-users,
I have done a test using test suit 4.0.4, and I got some failures as follows.
All 16 simple tests PASSED
FAILED. Check files in aminoacids
FAILED. Check files in field
FAILED. Check files in tip4p
FAILED. Check files in water
4 out of 14 complex tests FAILED
FAILED. Check files in
Bert wrote:
Dear gmx-users,
I have done a test using test suit 4.0.4, and I got some failures as follows.
All 16 simple tests PASSED
FAILED. Check files in aminoacids
FAILED. Check files in field
FAILED. Check files in tip4p
FAILED. Check files in water
4 out of 14 complex tests FAILED
Chec
Hi,
g_traj can write |f| or components of f in the b-factor field of a pdb file.
I guess VMD can read and display that.
I don't know if that will fulfill your needs.
Berk
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:19:59 +1000
> From: mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-user
Hi all users,
I am wondering how I can apply the shear force into the gromacs .Does anyone
has such experoence about that?
Really appreciate any suggestions.
Yang
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listi
Hi,
Read the pdf manual, it has an index entry for shear.
Berk
> From: yang...@mavs.uta.edu
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:10:24 +
> Subject: [gmx-users] how to apply shear force
>
> Hi all users,
>
> I am wondering how I can apply the shear force into the gromacs
Dear GMX-users.
I'm trying to do free energy calculations for calculations of
partitions coefficients.
My normal defaults section of TraPPE topologies are:
; nbfunc comb-rule gen-pairs fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
1 3 no
0.5
sovent accesible surface area?
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar wrote:
> stretching != swelling, e.g.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Bhanu wrote:
> > How about checking radius of gyration???
> >
> > 2009/5/18 Tsjerk Wassenaar
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Well, I think 'swell
Hi All,
Is there anyone who is running gromacs on glacier.westgrid.ca machine? If
yes, I will be appreciated if he/she can tell me how to run gmx on this
facility. I either get error messages which says either the executable or
the topology file can not be found.
Regards,
Payman
_
Well, why didn't I think of that? Maybe because flattening will also
increase the SAS, or (partial) unfolding, or opening of two domains...
:)
Tsjerk
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Marius Retegan
wrote:
> sovent accesible surface area?
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar
>
Dear David:
Thank you so much for the valuable information.
"Our conclusion in the above paper is to use PME for Coulomb and not shift
Van der Waals"
I have read the paper you mentioned and did not find how you treated the
VdW. Have you done some work on the cut off method for vdw? Since I used
Hi Anindita,
Proper carbohydrate parameters were introduced in G45a3. But you're
not easily satisfied, wanting proteins carbohydrates and lipids to
work together! You're short of wanting to include nucleic acids :)
Anyway, the lipids are a bit problematic. There are parameters for
some lipids for
Sam Moors wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for your suggestion.
However, I have a problem with the use of distance restraints in
gromacs. As described in the manual a restraint potential is applied to
each pair of atoms
separately. Instead, I would like the restraint potential to depend on the
root me
Hi Payman,
That is probably not the only grid facility on which Gromacs may be
run and it would be helpful if you could give specifications of it
(WMS software e.g.), which could give you more response. Also, it
would be helpful if you'd be able to give more information regarding
the output. Then
Dear Tsjerk,
Thanks for your e-mail. The message that cluster sends is:
"Running on 4 processors.
Starting run at: Sat May 16 17:13:28 PDT 2009
Warning: Command line arguments for program should be given
after the program name. Assuming that
./global/home/pirzadeh/gromacs-4.0.4/bin/mdrun_d is a
c
Payman Pirzadeh wrote:
Dear Tsjerk,
Thanks for your e-mail. The message that cluster sends is:
"Running on 4 processors.
Starting run at: Sat May 16 17:13:28 PDT 2009
Warning: Command line arguments for program should be given
after the program name. Assuming that
./global/home/pirzadeh/groma
Dear all:
This is the mdp I just used for the system. The funny thing is after a 8ns
simulation I got a very high pressure and temperature:
Temperature 343.437
Pressure (bar) 45.782
I also did another run with removing the vdw_switch in mdp and keep all
other conditi
Hi Justin,
Following is the script I use. But remember several points:
1. I compiled the gmx with double precision and did not rename the code to
mpi. I kept whatever was produced with _d suffix.
2. I use the same script for other codes and they work (I am using other MD
code for special purposes a
Payman Pirzadeh wrote:
Hi Justin,
Following is the script I use. But remember several points:
1. I compiled the gmx with double precision and did not rename the code to
mpi. I kept whatever was produced with _d suffix.
"Whatever was produced" does not inspire confidence. You're sure that
--
Hi
I want to get the simulation results fater and want to set
the time step
dt > = 0.002
what is the upper limit of the time step dt ?
Thank you
Lin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-user
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
I want to get the simulation results fater and want to set
the time step
dt > = 0.002
what is the upper limit of the time step dt ?
Some textbook reading is probably in order here. Also of interest are papers
describing constraint algorithms. Ultimately the t
Hi Lin,
I would suggest taking a look at the manual, specifically section 6.5
(Removing Fastest Degrees of Freedom), and any general textbook on
molecular simulation. Wanting faster results without having an
understanding of the method is a good recipe for getting the wrong
answer. There
I am planning on using g_clustsize to do some condensation analysis. I looked
at g_cluster and see that it has a number of method options including single
linkage and jarvis patrick. Is it true that g_clustsize has only the single
linkage option? I took a look at the source code but this type
Yanmei Song wrote:
Dear all:
This is the mdp I just used for the system. The funny thing is after a
8ns simulation I got a very high pressure and temperature:
Temperature 343.437
Pressure (bar) 45.782
I also did another run with removing the vdw_switch in mdp
Is there a local pressure version of Gromacs 4? I can only find Gromacs
version 3.02 with local pressure. If there is, could you tell me where to get
it? Thanks.
Daniel
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On
Behalf O
Jacob Spooner wrote:
I am planning on using g_clustsize to do some condensation analysis. I looked
at g_cluster and see that it has a number of method options including single
linkage and jarvis patrick. Is it true that g_clustsize has only the single
linkage option? I took a look at the sou
Dear Tsjerk,
Thanks for your reply. I am
interested to work with ganglioside GM1. In that case which ffG will be
appropriate for me.
Ms. Anindita Gayen
C/O Dr. Chaitali Mukhopadhyay
Senior Research Fellow
Department of Chemistry
University of Calcutta
92, A. P. C. Road
Hi Anindita,
I was sort of afraid you might be dealing with glycosphingolipids. The
Gromos force fields do not have properly behaving models for
sphingolipids yet. I'm not sure whether other force fields do much
better. There's some serious parameterization to do here. If you have
experimenal data
41 matches
Mail list logo