Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> When I think about where Gentoo was when we turned into a democracy
> years ago, and where Gentoo is now, I don't see much of a difference on
> the large scale. We lack any global vision for where Gentoo is going, we
> can't agree on who our audience is, and everyone's jus
Apeal on extended testing :
Developer, please test things more carefull before you
release it.
I already found things which does not compile out of
the box.
1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
have to unmask linuxwacom.
2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
merged. I
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
> I already found things which does not compile out of
> the box.
> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
> have to unmask linuxwacom.
Shrug. Noone even filed a
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 12:34:38 +0200
Edgar Hucek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
There are over 10,000 packages in the tree (11247 to be exact); each
of which can be built many ways with USE flags.
Jakub Moc schrieb:
> Edgar Hucek wrote:
>> Apeal on extended testing :
>>
>> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
>> release it.
>> I already found things which does not compile out of
>> the box.
>> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
>> have to unmask linuxwacom.
Am Samstag, 2. September 2006 13:18 schrieb Edgar Hucek:
> >> 2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
> >> merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools.
> >> It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
> >> can it happen that there are already know bugs in the
> >> stable distr
Danny van Dyk schrieb:
> Am Samstag, 2. September 2006 13:18 schrieb Edgar Hucek:
2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools.
It seams that USE flags are not realy tested or how
can it happen that there are already know bugs
On 02/09/06, Edgar Hucek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Realy funny, i only hear exuses but no real solution for the problem. The universe ending before testing is finished is a pretty good excuse.
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Just a side hint. Try to enable all flags at the first cimpile time would
> reduce trys drasticaly ;)
If you had a look at the php ebuild (just because we took it as example
here), you'd see that it is a bit more complicated than just enabling
everything to have everything tes
Edgar Hucek wrote:
>
>>From my point of view, should it be garanted that a package and depencies
> compiles when all use flags are enabled. If a depency can't be compiled the
> use flag and depence should be dissabled/removed from a package.
>
>
> cu
>
> Edgar (gimli) Hucek
Give us about 3000
Simon Stelling schrieb:
> Edgar Hucek wrote:
>> Just a side hint. Try to enable all flags at the first cimpile time would
>> reduce trys drasticaly ;)
>
> If you had a look at the php ebuild (just because we took it as example
> here), you'd see that it is a bit more complicated than just enabling
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Danny van Dyk schrieb:
>> This hasn't yet investigated allt he possible combinations of packages
>> depending on dev-lang/php, or the ~10,000 other packages in the tree.
>>
>> Danny
>
> Just a side hint. Try to enable all flags at the first cimpile time would
> reduce trys dr
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> I know my tools but not necessarly the normal user who wanna use gentoo
> and is ending frustrated.
If the users are too lazy to read the documentation, why should we care
about them?
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
I know my tools but not necessarly the normal user who wanna use gentoo
and is ending frustrated.
cu
Edgar (gimli) Hucek
Enrico? Is that you in disguise?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 01 September 2006 20:26, Greg KH wrote:
> So we are just fine, one of the advantages of being a source-based
> distro :)
Um, rereading term three of the GPL, you're right of course. The question
remains how do we flag this. LICENSE="GPL-2 CDDL-Schily" in case of
cdrtools!? Yes, the lat
Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:14:47 +0200:
> Edgar Hucek wrote:
>> I know my tools but not necessarly the normal user who wanna use gentoo
>> and is ending frustrated.
>
> If the users are too lazy to read the documentation,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Danny van Dyk schrieb:
>> Am Samstag, 2. September 2006 13:18 schrieb Edgar Hucek:
> 2.) Enable the use flage accessibility gnome cant be
> merged. It fails on compile the speech-tools.
> It seams that USE flags are not
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ours, but
> at least paying something entitles you to bitch at them.
Or consider paying a Gentoo develope
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
>> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
>> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ours, but
>> at least paying something entitles you to bitch at them.
> Or co
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:>> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you>> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ours, but
>> at least payi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Apeal on extended testing :
>
> Developer, please test things more carefull before you
> release it.
> I already found things which does not compile out of
> the box.
> 1.) Use wacom does not compile out of the box. You
> have to u
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
I was thinking about
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give the
developers we have more reasonable notice.
This is the second t
Hi,
On 9/2/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It might be worth putting together a list of folks interested in doing
this on the Gentoo website, under a Third-party Paid Support section. We
already have a Support link on the top of www.g.o, it could be on that page.
This is a good
Seems my message got swallowed...
On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:36, Edgar Hucek wrote:
> Just a side hint. Try to enable all flags at the first cimpile time would
> reduce trys drasticaly ;)
There are lots of use flag combinations incompatible with each other within a
package as well as packa
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers?
We didn't need 3000 mor
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi,
We'll also need to sort out a process for handling complaints against
developers from the folks they help. Doesn't matter how well we make
it clear that these folks are "independent"; their actions will
reflect on Gentoo as a whole, and unhappy customers _will_ complai
On Sunday 03 September 2006 00:16, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> Neither Gnome nor KDE (no use flag in this case) accessibiliy stuff builds
> now - and bug 116030 is open since nine months.
And waiting other 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 months won't change the thing. Why? Because we
have _no_ accessibility team right
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
>
> I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
Is it a bad thing to
On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
> >
> > I don't think that tha
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 17:08 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 05:51:07AM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
>>> 2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
>>> irc
Was removed due to repeated security issues, see bug 70090.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
5 min ago gentoo
Commit by antarus :: gentoo-x86/x11-plugins/gkrellm-alltraxclock/ (5
files in 2 dirs):
removing x11-plugins/gkrellm-alltraxclock for bug # 62373
This package hadn't been touched since 2002 and didn't compile
#
6 min ago gentoo
Commit by antarus :: gentoo-x8
On 9/2/06, Wiktor Wandachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suppose that there is a way that Gentoo can follow, only that its leaders,
developers and users need to see it clearly. Is there a publicly visible
page that contains current goals for new releases? Where all sub-project
leaders could ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 08:55:33AM -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
>>> If that's not good enough for you, please find a distribution that you
>>> have to pay for like RHEL. Their testing is no better than ou
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
we're understaffed, partly - and this is my very personal opinion - the
problem is that releasing with GCC 4.x has been rushed
I'd have to agree with you on that. I understand the appeal of exciting
press releases but there were over 75 GCC 4.1 bugs still open for
prob
36 matches
Mail list logo
