||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-22 16:03:14
UTC ---
Sebastian's patch applied to the head and 4.8 branch. Closing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-26 16:11:46
UTC ---
Per http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00970.html would it be OK to
get this committed to the 4.8 branch and head?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
Bug #: 56771
Summary: Integer Overflow? Building arm-rtems libgcc2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-28 20:10:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 29747
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29747
Preprocessed code that fails to build
I don't think this code is in error. At least I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2013-03-28 20:12:06
UTC ---
Created attachment 29748
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29748
Full build log
In case there is something useful in the build log.
Host: CentOS 6.4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||centos-6.4/i686
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
--- Comment #7 from Joel Sherrill 2013-04-03 14:43:16
UTC ---
Created attachment 29796
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29796
Patch to libcpp/configure.ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
--- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill 2013-04-03
15:39:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 29797
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29797
Patch for 4.6 and 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2013-05-02 18:55:02
UTC ---
>From Jeff Law:
The problem is that's not the right fix. See this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00707.html
Basically something needs to avoid buil
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |joel at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
Summary|Upstreaming the rtems |Upstreaming the rtems v850
|multilib gcc patch |multilib gcc patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57237
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill ---
This patch cannot be merged as is. It includes at least 4 separate issues.
+ v850 multilibs
+ sparc64-rtems definining SVR4
+ WCHAR issues
+ stddef.h issue
Patches can only be single issue.
I am going to us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57237
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill ---
Testing with this patch for just the v850:
2013-03-26 Ralf Corsépius
* config/v850/t-rtems: Use multilibs from gcc < 4.8.0.
diff -Naur gcc-4.8.0.orig/gcc/config/v850/t-rtems
gcc-4.8.0/gcc/config/v850
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57237
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55192
Bug #: 55192
Summary: bfin generates invalid assembly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
Bug #: 55194
Summary: h8300 ICE during conftest in libgcc dwarf2out:7605
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:07:01
UTC ---
Sorry... bad cut and paste. The assembly is OK. The cross compiler generates an
ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:22:30
UTC ---
xgcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20121103 (experimental) [trunk revision 193124]
Now fails just building libgcc with what appears to be the same error.
Short command line for preprocessed s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-03 17:23:38
UTC ---
Created attachment 28604
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28604
libgcc preprocessed file which trips bug
Description on how to reproduce given messages.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54490
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 01:56:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 28605
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28605
Preprocessed test case - from newlib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55192
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 03:55:28
UTC ---
Output of git bisect
[joel@baltimore gcc]$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 3 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
[5169661db3501031dfeb1971582809a702d6cebe] Integra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54747
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 06:20:02
UTC ---
git bisect should help:
[0e797c2e325bfe0676fc9b9e5baee01aefb164f5] /cp 2012-08-20 Paolo Carlini
[joel@baltimore gcc]$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 1 revision left to test a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55194
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 06:22:22
UTC ---
I added Jakub because I think this was the patch which broke it:
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Aug 20 18:56:49 2012 +
PR rtl-optimization/54294
* fwprop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-04 06:33:10
UTC ---
Following up on my earlier message.
Jon Beniston (original author) or Sebastien Bourdeauducq (current maintainer)
... please reply.
This particular issue should be simple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-05 14:44:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I always used to configure with --enable-sjlj-exceptions.
Thanks for the pointer.
I see in gcc/configure.ac, the command line handling for
--en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-05 14:47:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 28618
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28618
For sjlj exceptions on for lm32*-*-*
Is this the correct way to force it on? I don't see an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill 2012-11-05 15:30:46
UTC ---
I was careful to say "this issue" :) \
That is the next issue to face on the lm32 and was reported before this cropped
up.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5092
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
Summary: ICE mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:401
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
AssignedTo: i..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Summary: does not build multilib on m68k
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libffi
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-24 21:06:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 23108
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23108
Hacks to disable problem areas
This patch is a hack to conditionally disable the parts of the code w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-24 21:53:28
UTC ---
I didn't intend to disable them permanently. Just identify them to implement
alternatives.
If the sysv abi cannot be used on 68000, 680x0 w/o HW FP, or at least some
Coldfire, then w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440
--- Comment #11 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25
04:12:35 UTC ---
Still present.
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.6.0 20110124 (experimental) [trunk revision 169182] (arm-unknown-rtems4.11)
GCC error:
, joel at gcc dot
||gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Masaki MURANAKA 2010-12-12
05:14:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 22721
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22721
testcase after applied attachment 22719
In reply to comment #2)
m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43527
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25 04:16:31
UTC ---
The libgcc issue also occurs with lm32-rtems. Can that much be applied to the
trunk?
4.6.0 20110123 (experimental) [trunk revision 169143]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47458
Summary: m32r fails to build -- __builtin_eh_return not
supported
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
Summary: m68k Ada ICE in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at
sched-deps.c:854
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|m68k Ada ICE in |Regression: m68k Ada ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47458
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25 16:19:28
UTC ---
I can now build C/C++ for m32r-rtems*.
m32c-rtems* builds ok without any patches.
OK to commit this and close this PR?
Index: gcc/config/m32r/m32r.c
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47458
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25 18:15:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The alternative ABI is just slightly different. When using the 68881,
> floating
> point values are returned in %fp0. When not using it, floating point va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23108|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
--- Comment #10 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-25
20:42:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> >+#ifdef __rtems__
> >+void rtems_cache_flush_multiple_data_lines( const void *, size_t );
> >+#else
>
> Include the header that declares it.
>
> >+cm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23123|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Summary: i386-rtems* Ada ICE at reload1.c:2105
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig
||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #5 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 20:45:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Fixed.
Unfortunately, this fix broke cross builds. :(
/users/joel/test-gcc/b-gccada-i386/./gcc/xgcc
-B/users/j
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 21:23:59
UTC ---
Since i386-rtems* blew up with an ICE, I wanted to verify the Makefile change
with another target. sparc-rtems* built Ada with this patch:
I really don't know why targext.c needs to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47467
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 22:01:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > Is targext.c really supposed to be part of LIBGNAT_SRCS for the target or is
> > this just a host side compiler helper?
>
> Unfortunately the former. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47459
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-26 23:04:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Joel, can you verify the fix for 46878 fixes his problem on the m68k. I'm
> pretty sure it will, but an independent verification would be good.
>
> Thanks,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37665
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
Summary: mips-*-rtems*: -G0 option not recognized by gnat1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-28 16:56:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > Hints or tiny patch appreciated.
>
> You need to find out whether/how this works for the C compiler.
What do you mean? It dictates the maximum size of o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-28 21:18:17
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm, isn't the option "-G 0" and not "-G0" ?
We have been using -G0 for years with the rtems mips BSPs and gcc happily
accepts it. The parsing of it must b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47534
Summary: [regression] avr libgcc.S fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47540
--- Comment #3 from Joel Sherrill 2011-01-30 16:39:05
UTC ---
Test case also fails on arm-rtems4.11 4.5.2 and arm-rtems4.10 4.4.5. It works
on arm-rtems4.9 which is 4.3.2
= 4.5.2
$ sh -x j
+ /opt/rtems-4.11/bin/arm-rtem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47548
Summary: [regression] m32c-rtems ICEt in change_address_1, at
emit-rtl.c:1933
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #33 from Joel Sherrill 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47563
Summary: m32r does not have synchronization primitives
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #7 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-01 21:37:05
UTC ---
Does the patch fix things for you(In reply to comment #6)
> Original/complete patch is at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02561.html
Does this fix the head for you?
If
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47548
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-04 14:39:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 23245
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23245
Next ICE
With your patch, the build fails earlier.
$ m32c-rtems4.11-gcc -mcpu=m32cm -g -O1 -c pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47548
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-04 15:10:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> That's odd. Could you take my patch back out, and verify the problem goes
> back
> to the original one? My patch shouldn't be able to affect anything earl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47548
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-04 18:30:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> See if one of these other changes caused the problem. If so, yeah, I'll check
> this one in and we'll work on the other one separately. The new error you'r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #14 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
00:18:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23261
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23261
Patch to use stub file
With Laurent's stub version of s-scaval.adb added as s-scaval-sh.adb and a
m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #15 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
01:13:51 UTC ---
ACATS results are not perfect but not bad for a first run.
PASSED: 1984 FAILED 335
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #18 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
14:22:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> > With Laurent's stub version of s-scaval.adb added as s-scaval-sh.adb and a
> > minor change to a ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in, sh-rtems now builds
> > A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #19 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
17:22:59 UTC ---
Following up on my own comment. Dealing with targets without double precision
FPUs is a broader issue:
$ grep -r DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE . | grep "SIZE.*32" | grep -v .svn
./rx/rx.h:#defin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47534
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #21 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
22:27:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Thanks Joel for the acats.log.
>
> from the failing test list my guess is that tasking is broken and was working
> for your previous test.
>
> All tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
--- Comment #4 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-08 19:02:10
UTC ---
With that patch, i386-rtems now builds.
Can you commit it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-08 19:22:13
UTC ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47442
Patch reviewed by libffi maintainers and committed to SVN head.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41434
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33803
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.2.3, 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 4.2.2
Known to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35298
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39182
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39184
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39185
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41122
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43527
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42368
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-08 21:46:43
UTC ---
Ping on this. Would a patch be OK?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47761
Summary: powerpc not supporting -mcpu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #10 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-25
17:30:46 UTC ---
Richard I added this to you since I think Sebastian's bisect turned up a patch
by you.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50100
Bug #: 50100
Summary: 4.6.1 C++ Manuals Missing
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #44 from Joel Sherrill 2011-09-09
13:27:54 UTC ---
Ping.. any chance of getting the proposed 4.6 fix merged? Please.
This is almost a 3 year old bug. It would be nice to get it closed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
Bug #: 50925
Summary: avr ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 19:42:50
UTC ---
gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20111029 (experimental)
Newlib up to date at same time
Cut and pasted from log with multiple jobs in parallel. The actual command
line for hash.c was.
/home2/joel/b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 19:43:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 25667
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25667
Preprocessed output
Preprocessed code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
Bug #: 50927
Summary: lm32 ICE seg fauit compiling libgcc2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 21:02:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 25669
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25669
Preprocessed source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
Bug #: 50928
Summary: ICE building RTEMS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50928
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-10-30 21:09:56
UTC ---
Created attachment 25670
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25670
Preprocessed source code
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
