Re: how to find variable related to a virtual ssa name

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 6:00 AM 易会战 wrote: > > There are some other cases that I cannot get right answer. > case1: interproceduure > func(int*arg) > { > return arg[0] + arg[1] > } > func2() > { > int a[10] > return func(a); > } > here func cannot tell arg is local var. > > case 2: global array po

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 07:45, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 19:44, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 18:19, Mike Stump via Gcc wrote: > > > > > > I've changed the subject to match the 2015, 2017 and 2018 email threads. > > > > > > On May 13, 2020, a

Re: ChangeLog files - server and client scripts (git cherry-pick)

Hello. I'm sending patch candidate that adds 2 new git aliases: - gcc-backport - simple alias to 'git cherry-pick -x' - gcc-revert - it similarly appends '(this reverts commit 365e3cde4978c6a7dbfa50865720226254c016be)' to a reverted commit message The script normally parses content of a git mes

Re: ChangeLog files - server and client scripts

On 5/13/20 7:53 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2020, Martin Liška wrote: I'm sending the gcc-changelog relates scripts which should be added to contrib folder. The patch contains: - git_check_commit.py - checking script that verifies git message format We need a documentation patch to

Re: dejagnu version update?

Hi Maciej, > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> > I'm in favour of requiring 1.5.3 or later, so 1.6 would be OK for me. >> >> If we go beyond 1.5.x, we need to go all the way up to 1.6.2: 1.6 and >> 1.6.1 have an ugly bug that can miss timeouts, causing tests to hang >> indefinitely unt

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 5/14/20 8:08 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: >> stops responding for whatever reason. I have come up with a solution >> (that I'd be happy to upstream, except that DejaGNU maintenance seems to >> have been dead for like a year now), which I have also confirmed to be >> required with current DejaGNU

Re: dejagnu version update?

Hi Rainer, > > Versions 1.6 and 1.6.1 seem ubiquitous and coincidentally earlier this > > very week I have been chasing a phenomenon with Expect's `wait' semantics > > causing a reliable hang in remote testing if `ssh' to the target board > > stops responding for whatever reason. I have come

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:00 PM Rob Savoye wrote: > > On 5/14/20 8:08 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > > >> stops responding for whatever reason. I have come up with a solution > >> (that I'd be happy to upstream, except that DejaGNU maintenance seems to > >> have been dead for like a year now), which I

Re: ChangeLog files - server and client scripts

On Thu, 14 May 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > On 5/13/20 7:53 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Wed, 13 May 2020, Martin Liška wrote: > > > > > I'm sending the gcc-changelog relates scripts which should be added to > > > contrib > > > folder. The patch contains: > > > - git_check_commit.py - checking s

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 5/14/20 10:08 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > Have you approached the Linux Foundation Core Infrastructure > Initiative for funding for both DejaGNU maintenance (patch backlog) > and refactoring DejaGNU in Python efforts? Not that team, the folks I talked to thought I was crazy for wanting to re

Re: dejagnu version update?

> "Rob" == Rob Savoye writes: Rob> Not that team, the folks I talked to thought I was crazy for wanting Rob> to refactor it. :-) I don't think refactoring dejagnu is crazy, but I think it's pretty hard to imagine rewriting the gdb test suite in Python. It's 260 KLOC. Tom

gcc-8-20200514 is now available

Snapshot gcc-8-20200514 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200514/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: dejagnu version update?

On Thu, 14 May 2020, Rob Savoye wrote: > Personally, I tried to find funding to refactor DejaGnu in Python, > since Tcl is unmaintained too, but nobody was interested. Thank you for your contribution to DejaGnu over the years and for your input on this occasion. However it does not appear t

Re: dejagnu version update?

On 5/14/20 5:34 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > And then current development appears ongoing, ferociously indeed, with the > last check in literally today (barring my time zone), as indicated here: > . It's obvious I haven't been paying attention, so muc

Re: dejagnu version update?

Rob Savoye wrote: On 5/14/20 10:08 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: Have you approached the Linux Foundation Core Infrastructure Initiative for funding for both DejaGNU maintenance (patch backlog) and refactoring DejaGNU in Python efforts? Not that team, the folks I talked to thought I was