Re: BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8

2007-12-31 Thread Boris Boesler
Am 08.12.2007 um 02:49 schrieb Joseph S. Myers: On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Ross Ridge wrote: Boris Boesler writes: Ok, so what have I to do to write a back-end where all addresses are given in bits? Memory is addressed in bits, not bytes. So I set: #define BITS_PER_UNIT 1 #define UNITS_PER_WORD 32

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC

2007-12-31 Thread Richard Guenther
On Dec 17, 2007 9:28 PM, Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/17/07 12:51, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > >> I guess I'm to blame, for having naïvely put the code out without as > >> much as a design and goals document > > > Y

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC

2007-12-31 Thread Richard Guenther
On 18 Dec 2007 08:13:55 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > A plan to fix local variable debug information in GCC > > > > by Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > 2007-12-18 draft >

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC

2007-12-31 Thread Alexandre Oliva
On Dec 20, 2007, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, which will significantly increase debugging size as you add two > more notes around many lines. FWIW, I've just got powerpc64-linux-gnu to pass bootstrap-debug and bootstrap4-debug/-g0 (i.e., all host and target libraries pass

Re: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate

2007-12-31 Thread Kaveh R. GHAZI
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > The release of MPFR 2.3.1 is imminent. Please help to make this > release as good as possible by downloading and testing this > release candidate: > [...] > Changes from version 2.3.0 to version 2.3.1: > - Bug fixes; see

gcc-4.1-20071231 is now available

2007-12-31 Thread gccadmin
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20071231 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20071231/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC

2007-12-31 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
"Richard Guenther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] I chose to ignore this problem and say we debug the optimized > program, not the source as far as life ranges are concerned. [...] Yes, and this choice has a certain pragmatism. However, it seems to miss the basic observation that what dri

Re: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate

2007-12-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2007-12-31 14:38:21 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > I read through the bugs in 2.3.0 from the above link. I'm trying to see > if I can write a GCC testcase that exposes one of those bugs when GCC is > linked with mpfr-2.3.0, but passes when I use 2.3.1-rc1. > > The bug would need to be exposed

Re: MPFR 2.3.1 Release Candidate

2007-12-31 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2007-12-29 23:25:39 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > * Some functions were failing when some global flag was set before > the call, and unfortunately most tests were done with all flags > cleared. Now, in the generic tests, all the global flags are > set before a test with a probabi

Re: GNU Assembler Start of Function & basic block

2007-12-31 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
Hi Balaji, Its probably better to continue this conversation on gcc@ - so moving it over there. On Jan 1, 2008 11:40 AM, Balaji V. Iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Ramana, >Thank you very much for your response. I am doing it through > assembler because I want to put specalized cont