Re: listing all modules compiled into a kernel instance

2011-03-03 Thread Carl
On 2011-03-01 2:13 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On 2011-03-01 5:00 AM, John Baldwin wrote: Maybe ucom doesn't appear because it doesn't have a DRIVER_MODULE() declaration (because it isn't a driver). Yes, that would explain it. I can explicitly include ucom in a kernel by adding "device ucom" in

vm.phys_free

2011-03-03 Thread Dr. Baud
Can someone explain exactly what phys_free is telling me, I understand the three pools (DEFAULT, DIRECT and CACHE) and 13 orders of pages. But what does lcnt represent? [root@sn12 ~]# sysctl vm.phys_free vm.phys_free: FREE LIST 0: ORDER (SIZE) | NUMBER | POOL 0 |

Re: listing all modules compiled into a kernel instance

2011-03-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:03:02 am Carl wrote: > On 2011-03-01 2:13 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 2011-03-01 5:00 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > Maybe ucom doesn't appear because it doesn't have a DRIVER_MODULE() > declaration (because it isn't a driver). > >>> > >>> Yes, that would expl

Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID values periodically, in an attempt to get a better idea how the resources of a system are being used during a long-running (usually measured in hours), mission-critical workload. In the process of testing this, I've seen some of the VF

Re: listing all modules compiled into a kernel instance

2011-03-03 Thread Carl
On 2011-03-03 7:08 AM, John Baldwin wrote: Ah, but your assertion is what is wrong. There is no 'apic' module for 'device apic' for example. Also, a single 'device foo' might enable multiple "modules" (e.g. if foo supports devices on both PCI and ISA buses, you will have foo/pci and foo/isa mod

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID > values periodically, in an attempt to get a better idea how the > resources of a system are being used during a long-running (usually > measured in hours), mission-critical wo

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: >> I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID >> values periodically, in an attempt to get a better idea how the >> resources of a system are being used during a long

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Gooch > wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill >> wrote: >>> I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID >>> values periodically, in an attempt to get a better

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Gooch >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill >>> wrote: I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysc