Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC...

1999-08-04 Thread Mark Murray
> This is a clear security vs functionality issue and I need to get a > good feel for which "cause" is ascendent here in knowing which way to > jump on the matter. Can we now hear the closing arguments from the > pro and con folks? I am pro. It takes a root compromise to use it anyway, and its u

Re: So, back on the topic of enabling bpf in GENERIC...

1999-08-04 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I am pro. > > It takes a root compromise to use it anyway, and its usefulness > for DHCP and rarpd is too compelling. > > Perhaps the comments in the GENERIC file could be updated. Well, given that I've gotten primarily positive support for this I guess it's time to do it. Warner, do you want

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > Speaking of the jail() syscall -- it really needs to be revamped a > > little before people really start using it wholeheartedly. The size > > of the jail structure needs to be passed in the syscall to allow > > backwards > > compatibili

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Doug Rabson
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Speaking of the jail() syscall -- it really needs to be revamped a > > > little before people really start using it wholeheartedly. The size > > > of the jail structure needs to be passed in

[Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Niall Smart
Olivia Cheriton wrote: > > Niall, > > VMware will support FreeBSD as a guest operating system, but unfortunately > we currently do not have plans to support FreeBSD as a host operating > system. I have noted your request of FreeBSD host support in case we review > this in the future. > > Best r

RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?

1999-08-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Biju Susmer wrote: > hi, > I tried yesterday to make the kernel understand my CD ROM drive.. but it > refused. Here is the dmesg (of boot -v)... is my config wrong or i missed > something? The drive is Acer 32X and connected as secondary slave. It is seen > by > Win98 and BI

Re: BSD voice synthesis

1999-08-04 Thread Ville-Pertti Keinonen
w...@softweyr.com (Wes Peters) writes: > available for "home" computers decades ago. (Anyone else here ever use > SAM "the Software Automated Mouth" for the Atari 800 or Commodore 64?) Yes. It's almost surprising how little speech synthesis has improved, at least judging from the festival demo

Re: Solution for mail pseudo-users?

1999-08-04 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 02:22:17PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote: > > Also you'll have to run the script to allow users to change passwords as > > "root", which you probably will NOT want to do (same for adding/ > > deleting/changing users) > > So with your setup, any user can add/delete/modify existi

Onstream?

1999-08-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Out of curiousity, have there been any successes in the drivers for the OnStream tape drives (SCSI or IDE)? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: v...@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include

Re: Onstream?

1999-08-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > Out of curiousity, have there been any successes in the drivers for > the OnStream tape drives (SCSI or IDE)? Working on it (for IDE that is), support is planned for, but I have no release date yet... I know that there is work done on the SCSI end too... -Sør

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Mike Pritchard
> At 8:01 PM +0200 8/3/99, Robert Nordier wrote: > > > > - If I select 3.2 at the PowerBoot menu, it comes up > > > with two messages about "invalid partition", [...] > > > It seems to want to boot 'da(0,a)/kernel', but if I > > > type in 'da(0,e)/kernel', then it boots up fi

Re: BSD voice synthesis

1999-08-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ville-Pertti Keinonen writes: > I certainly don't expect any of the available voices to be able to > pronounce Finnish names correctly, even with phonetic specifications. If the software were *designed* to speak Finnish, I'd expect it to cope with Finnish much better than it currently does with E

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
"Brian F. Feldman" writes: > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Actually, with interfaces like this you should generally pass a pointer > > to the structure in userspace, and stick a version number constant in > > the beginning of the structure. The size is often not enough of a >

Re: Results of investigating optimizing calloc()...

1999-08-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Kelly Yancey" writes: > [...] Which reminds me - has anyone thought of using DMA for zeroing pages, to avoid cache invalidation? The idea is to keep a chunk of zeroes on disk and DMA it into memory instead of clearing pages "manually". This assumes your disk supports DMA, of course. DES -- Dag

Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Kevin
Hey all, I purchased a Tekram DC-390U2W scsi controller to use with a FreeBSD server of mine. It uses the NCR 53c141 (and 53c895?) chipset(s). I see that ncr.c supports the NCR 53c8xx family of chipsets.. which the controller is seen as having a 53c895, which only supports 40Mb/sec operation(?)

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Oscar Bonilla wrote: > >If anyone has any comments, suggestions, etc. I would appreciate it. > > Overall, I like the idea of NSS. But, having worked on Solaris 2.x > for some time, we need to avoid some of the blunders Sun made: The > biggest problem wi

Re: BSD voice synthesis

1999-08-04 Thread Ville-Pertti Keinonen
d...@flood.ping.uio.no (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) writes: > Ville-Pertti Keinonen writes: > > I certainly don't expect any of the available voices to be able to > > pronounce Finnish names correctly, even with phonetic specifications. > If the software were *designed* to speak Finnish, I'd expect it

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Niall Smart wrote: > Olivia Cheriton wrote: > > > > Niall, > > > > VMware will support FreeBSD as a guest operating system, but unfortunately > > we currently do not have plans to support FreeBSD as a host operating > > system. I have noted your request of FreeBSD host suppo

Re: Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
> Hey all, I purchased a Tekram DC-390U2W scsi controller to use with > a FreeBSD server of mine. It uses the NCR 53c141 (and 53c895?) > chipset(s). I see that ncr.c supports the NCR 53c8xx family of > chipsets.. which the controller is seen as having a 53c895, which > only supports 40Mb/sec op

RE: Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Nigel Roles
The 53c141 is an auto-sensing single-ended/LVDS terminator, permitting you to connect single-ended and LVDS drives to the same cable. It is transparent. If you want 80mbps you need 1. a wide LVDS (aka Ultra2 or fast40) drive 2. a wide LVDS terminator The 40 in the portion of ncr.c you quote is M

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Graham Wheeler
Robert Nordier wrote: > > It's usually best to temporarily change fdisk partition types, > so that sysinstall sees no existing FreeBSD slice on the drive. > However, there may be other problems involved here as well. Hmmm. This sounds a good plan. Would the following then work (I'm using `partiti

double vfs_object_create in open syscall?

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Why does open() at "sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c" line 1023 call vfs_object_create() when vnopen() ("sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c" line 174) already does so? vfs_object_create checks for this and doesn't leak, but it looks funny to me. -Alfred Perlstein - [bri...@rush.net|bri...@wintelcom.net] systems admin

Re: Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
> What makes you think you haven't got 80mbps? How would you tell? Something like this in your dmesg/boot output. da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
Alfred Perlstein writes: > I heard they have released the source to the kernel modules needed > to run it. > > why not port them over? :) I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux kernel module does, whi

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Graham Wheeler
Graham Wheeler wrote: > > Robert Nordier wrote: > > > > It's usually best to temporarily change fdisk partition types, > > so that sysinstall sees no existing FreeBSD slice on the drive. > > However, there may be other problems involved here as well. > > Hmmm. This sounds a good plan. Would the f

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Assar Westerlund wrote: > Alfred Perlstein writes: > > I heard they have released the source to the kernel modules needed > > to run it. > > > > why not port them over? :) > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > must confess that I don't fully understa

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 4 Aug 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Alfred Perlstein writes: > > I heard they have released the source to the kernel modules needed > > to run it. > > > > why not port them over? :) > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > must confess that I don't fully u

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Robert Nordier
> > > It's usually best to temporarily change fdisk partition types, > > > so that sysinstall sees no existing FreeBSD slice on the drive. > > > However, there may be other problems involved here as well. > > > > Hmmm. This sounds a good plan. Would the following then work > > (I'm using `partitio

fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-04 Thread Chuck Youse
I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... In this day and age, with firewalls and NAT abound, it's a bit odd that such a change has not already been made. Am I missing something? Is there a reason we haven't d

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Milan Kopacka
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > > must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux > > kernel module does, which makes it somewhat harder to implement the > > same functionality on FreeBSD :-) >

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Milan Kopacka wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > > > must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux > > > kernel module does, which makes it somewhat harder to i

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Milan Kopacka
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > so one must purchase the program to get the kernel mods, is there > an evaluation that can be downloaded? They have all described on website. The program is key-protected, you can buy a key, or ask for evaluation key, which will work one month. You n

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Graham Wheeler
Robert Nordier wrote: > > Because most modern BIOSes do CHS translation, the BIOS geometry is > not always evident from the geometry reported by the drive, and > FreeBSD may get this wrong, particularly if no existing partitions > are defined. > > Since you are installing to a drive with no pre-e

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On 4 Aug 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > "Brian F. Feldman" writes: > > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > > Actually, with interfaces like this you should generally pass a pointer > > > to the structure in userspace, and stick a version number constant in > > > the beginning of t

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: > The argument for versioning is not simply because the size of ip_number > might change (it should be a sockaddr) but because other fields might be > added or removed. To avoid allocating a new syscall whenever this happens, > the structure should be version

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
Soren Schmidt writes: > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > > must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux > > kernel module does, which makes it somewhat harder to implement the > > same functionality on FreeBSD :-) > > If you provide an

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
"Brian F. Feldman" writes: > As I read it, sockaddr is a transparent type (overloaded, as it were). > So we would use something like: > struct jail { > ... > struct sockaddr; > char [SOCK_MAXADDRLEN - sizeof(struct sockaddr)]; > char [s

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
Peter Jeremy writes: > We need to be able to build an application that has no dynamically > loaded code for recovery purposes (/stand and /sbin) as well as for > security. Isn't that the same problem as with PAM? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freeb

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Robert Nordier
> > Because most modern BIOSes do CHS translation, the BIOS geometry is > > not always evident from the geometry reported by the drive, and > > FreeBSD may get this wrong, particularly if no existing partitions > > are defined. > > > > Since you are installing to a drive with no pre-existing non-F

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Matthew Dillon
:The argument for versioning is not simply because the size of ip_number :might change (it should be a sockaddr) but because other fields might be :added or removed. To avoid allocating a new syscall whenever this happens, :the structure should be versioned. : :Putting sizeof(whatever) at the begin

NSS Project update

1999-08-04 Thread Oscar Bonilla
After collecting a bunch of emails from the list, this is the approach I'll be taking: 1. use the existing nsdispatch code obtained from NetBSD as a base for parsing the /etc/nsswitch.conf file. 2. Make the C library nsdispatch aware. The dtab[] array will be filled dynamicaly from the cont

no getkerninfo() man page (docs/12220)

1999-08-04 Thread Nik Clayton
-hackers, As docs/12220 points out; We want to extract routing information by specifying a particular destination IP address. The man page on Route and Rtentry mention that this information can be acquired using getkerninfo command. But there is no such man page. Is it possi

Re: TCP stack hackers take a bow

1999-08-04 Thread Nik Clayton
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 07:52:26PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote: > > > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm > > The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes. > > Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own com

Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread Warner Losh
I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs. Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure? gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains about bad assmbler contraints. Warner To Unsubscri

Re: Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread David Scheidt
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > > I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for > freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs. > Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure? > > gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complains a

Re: Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread Osokin Sergey
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > > I have a freebsd-stable system. I can't build a kernel for > freebsd-current on that system unless I upgrade my compiler to egcs. > Will this cause problems for our upgrade proceedure? > > gcc 2.7.2.3 doesn't like i386/include/atomic.h. It complain

Re: Results of investigating optimizing calloc()...

1999-08-04 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote ... > "Kelly Yancey" writes: > > [...] > > Which reminds me - has anyone thought of using DMA for zeroing pages, > to avoid cache invalidation? The idea is to keep a chunk of zeroes on > disk and DMA it into memory instead of clearing pages "manually". This > assumes

Re: Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message David Scheidt writes: : I upgraded a -STABLE system to -CURRENT using source a month or two : ago. The first step is to build the new toolchain, so you shouldn't : ever be compiling a new kernel with an old compiler. In the past, we've given advise to build a new kernel, then reb

Re: Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message Osokin Sergey writes: : try to cvsup your source tree to 4.0, then rebuild your system : with simply make world procedure. I can't do that. This system *MUST* be a 3.2-stable system. I was building the kernel to test to see if a nasty NFS bug I've found in -stable is present in the

Re: no getkerninfo() man page (docs/12220)

1999-08-04 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article you write: >-hackers, > >As docs/12220 points out; > >We want to extract routing information by specifying a particular >destination IP address. The man page on Route and Rtentry mention >that this information can be acquired using getkerninfo command. But >there

Re: Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread David Scheidt
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message > David > Scheidt writes: > : I upgraded a -STABLE system to -CURRENT using source a month or two > : ago. The first step is to build the new toolchain, so you shouldn't > : ever be compiling a new kernel with an old compiler. > > In the

Re: Results of investigating optimizing calloc()...

1999-08-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >Which reminds me - has anyone thought of using DMA for zeroing pages, This sounds reasonable. Some DMA engines support filling regions and memory-memory copies, but I'm not sure about what can be done with the DMA engine(s) in PCs. > The idea is to keep a chunk of zer

Re: Building a new kernel

1999-08-04 Thread Warner Losh
In message David Scheidt writes: : Read the docs? Who me? It sounds like the 3.X to 4.0-RELEASE documentation : should say not to do this. Unless, of course, gcc-2.95 is imported before : t hen. Give me a F*ing break. No such documetation exists and the more that we change in how things tr

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
Assar Westerlund wrote: >Peter Jeremy writes: >> We need to be able to build an application that has no dynamically >> loaded code for recovery purposes (/stand and /sbin) as well as for >> security. > >Isn't that the same problem as with PAM? Quite probably PAM has the same problem. I haven't

memory leak in the routing table ?

1999-08-04 Thread jayanth
Were there any issues related to a memory leak in the routing table ? I am running freebsd-stable. After a few days vmstat -m shows the memory used by routing table to be very high and log messages "arpresolve: cant allocate llinfo for a.b.c.d" "arplookup a.b.c.d failed could not allocate llinfo"

ignoretime in login.conf??

1999-08-04 Thread Doug
I'm doing some research on resource limits and I can't find any information at all on the ignoretime capability that's in /usr/src/etc/login.conf. A 'grep -iR ignoretime *' in /usr/src didn't return any hits outside of the login.conf files in /usr/src/etc and the picobsd stuff. Does anyone

netstat broken for -N -M?

1999-08-04 Thread Warner Losh
I'm seeing on a -stable system that netstat will always print values obtained from sysctl rather than from the core file specified. Can anybody confirm this? It doesn't seem like feature to me... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in t

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 04-Aug-99 Matthew Dillon wrote: > I kinda like the second choice the best but the first choice is what > most > other system calls use. That doesn't make it right =) The second avoids the 'the data is different but the size is the same' problem which would seem to be not too uncomm

Re: NSS Project update

1999-08-04 Thread Boris Popov
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote: [skip] > 2. Make the C library nsdispatch aware. The dtab[] array will be >filled dynamicaly from the contents of /etc/nsswitch.conf. >I'm still not sure if this has to be done "whithin" the C library >or if nsdispatch should fill the dtab[] arr

Re: Results of investigating optimizing calloc()...

1999-08-04 Thread Arun Sharma
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 01:20:59PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Kelly Yancey" writes: > > [...] > > Which reminds me - has anyone thought of using DMA for zeroing pages, > to avoid cache invalidation? The idea is to keep a chunk of zeroes on > disk and DMA it into memory instead of cleari

Re: Results of investigating optimizing calloc()...

1999-08-04 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Dag-Erling Smorgrav scribbled this message on Aug 4: > "Kelly Yancey" writes: > > [...] > > Which reminds me - has anyone thought of using DMA for zeroing pages, > to avoid cache invalidation? The idea is to keep a chunk of zeroes on > disk and DMA it into memory instead of clearing pages "manual

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread John Polstra
In article <99aug5.074611est.40...@border.alcanet.com.au>, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Assar Westerlund wrote: > >Peter Jeremy writes: > >> We need to be able to build an application that has no dynamically > >> loaded code for recovery purposes (/stand and /sbin) as well as for > >> security. > > >

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
John Polstra wrote: >Peter Jeremy wrote: >> Assar Westerlund wrote: >> >Peter Jeremy writes: >> >> We need to be able to build an application that has no dynamically >> >> loaded code for recovery purposes (/stand and /sbin) as well as for >> >> security. >> > >> >Isn't that the same problem a

Re: no getkerninfo() man page (docs/12220)

1999-08-04 Thread Nik Clayton
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 03:59:00PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > getkerninfo() is depreciated, we use sysctl() instead. In fact, most of > the information provided by getkerninfo() is implemented in terms of > sysctl(). > The route(4) manpage says: > > User processes can obtain informat

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Doug Rabson
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Speaking of the jail() syscall -- it really needs to be revamped a > > > little before people really start using it wholeheartedly. The size > > > of the jail structure needs to be passed in

[Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Niall Smart
Olivia Cheriton wrote: > > Niall, > > VMware will support FreeBSD as a guest operating system, but unfortunately > we currently do not have plans to support FreeBSD as a host operating > system. I have noted your request of FreeBSD host support in case we review > this in the future. > > Best

RE: IDE quirk in 3.2-STABLE kernel ?

1999-08-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Biju Susmer wrote: > hi, > I tried yesterday to make the kernel understand my CD ROM drive.. but it > refused. Here is the dmesg (of boot -v)... is my config wrong or i missed > something? The drive is Acer 32X and connected as secondary slave. It is seen by > Win98 and BIOS

Re: BSD voice synthesis

1999-08-04 Thread Ville-Pertti Keinonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wes Peters) writes: > available for "home" computers decades ago. (Anyone else here ever use > SAM "the Software Automated Mouth" for the Atari 800 or Commodore 64?) Yes. It's almost surprising how little speech synthesis has improved, at least judging from the festival dem

Re: Solution for mail pseudo-users?

1999-08-04 Thread Markus Stumpf
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 02:22:17PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote: > > Also you'll have to run the script to allow users to change passwords as > > "root", which you probably will NOT want to do (same for adding/ > > deleting/changing users) > > So with your setup, any user can add/delete/modify exist

Onstream?

1999-08-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Out of curiousity, have there been any successes in the drivers for the OnStream tape drives (SCSI or IDE)? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] flame-mail: /dev/null # include

Re: Onstream?

1999-08-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > Out of curiousity, have there been any successes in the drivers for > the OnStream tape drives (SCSI or IDE)? Working on it (for IDE that is), support is planned for, but I have no release date yet... I know that there is work done on the SCSI end too... -Sø

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Mike Pritchard
> At 8:01 PM +0200 8/3/99, Robert Nordier wrote: > > > > - If I select 3.2 at the PowerBoot menu, it comes up > > > with two messages about "invalid partition", [...] > > > It seems to want to boot 'da(0,a)/kernel', but if I > > > type in 'da(0,e)/kernel', then it boots up f

Re: BSD voice synthesis

1999-08-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Ville-Pertti Keinonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I certainly don't expect any of the available voices to be able to > pronounce Finnish names correctly, even with phonetic specifications. If the software were *designed* to speak Finnish, I'd expect it to cope with Finnish much better than it c

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
"Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Actually, with interfaces like this you should generally pass a pointer > > to the structure in userspace, and stick a version number constant in > > the beginning of the structure. The size is often

Re: Results of investigating optimizing calloc()...

1999-08-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"Kelly Yancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] Which reminds me - has anyone thought of using DMA for zeroing pages, to avoid cache invalidation? The idea is to keep a chunk of zeroes on disk and DMA it into memory instead of clearing pages "manually". This assumes your disk supports DMA, of

Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Kevin
Hey all, I purchased a Tekram DC-390U2W scsi controller to use with a FreeBSD server of mine. It uses the NCR 53c141 (and 53c895?) chipset(s). I see that ncr.c supports the NCR 53c8xx family of chipsets.. which the controller is seen as having a 53c895, which only supports 40Mb/sec operation(?)

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote: > Oscar Bonilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >If anyone has any comments, suggestions, etc. I would appreciate it. > > Overall, I like the idea of NSS. But, having worked on Solaris 2.x > for some time, we need to avoid some of the blunders Sun made: The

Re: BSD voice synthesis

1999-08-04 Thread Ville-Pertti Keinonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) writes: > Ville-Pertti Keinonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I certainly don't expect any of the available voices to be able to > > pronounce Finnish names correctly, even with phonetic specifications. > If the software were *designed* to speak Finnish

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Niall Smart wrote: > Olivia Cheriton wrote: > > > > Niall, > > > > VMware will support FreeBSD as a guest operating system, but unfortunately > > we currently do not have plans to support FreeBSD as a host operating > > system. I have noted your request of FreeBSD host supp

Re: Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
> Hey all, I purchased a Tekram DC-390U2W scsi controller to use with > a FreeBSD server of mine. It uses the NCR 53c141 (and 53c895?) > chipset(s). I see that ncr.c supports the NCR 53c8xx family of > chipsets.. which the controller is seen as having a 53c895, which > only supports 40Mb/sec o

RE: Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Nigel Roles
The 53c141 is an auto-sensing single-ended/LVDS terminator, permitting you to connect single-ended and LVDS drives to the same cable. It is transparent. If you want 80mbps you need 1. a wide LVDS (aka Ultra2 or fast40) drive 2. a wide LVDS terminator The 40 in the portion of ncr.c you quote is

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Graham Wheeler
Robert Nordier wrote: > > It's usually best to temporarily change fdisk partition types, > so that sysinstall sees no existing FreeBSD slice on the drive. > However, there may be other problems involved here as well. Hmmm. This sounds a good plan. Would the following then work (I'm using `partit

double vfs_object_create in open syscall?

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Why does open() at "sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c" line 1023 call vfs_object_create() when vnopen() ("sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c" line 174) already does so? vfs_object_create checks for this and doesn't leak, but it looks funny to me. -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] systems admin

Re: Tekram DC-390U2W support (80Mb/sec operation)

1999-08-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
> What makes you think you haven't got 80mbps? How would you tell? Something like this in your dmesg/boot output. da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I heard they have released the source to the kernel modules needed > to run it. > > why not port them over? :) I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux ker

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Graham Wheeler
Graham Wheeler wrote: > > Robert Nordier wrote: > > > > It's usually best to temporarily change fdisk partition types, > > so that sysinstall sees no existing FreeBSD slice on the drive. > > However, there may be other problems involved here as well. > > Hmmm. This sounds a good plan. Would the

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Assar Westerlund wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I heard they have released the source to the kernel modules needed > > to run it. > > > > why not port them over? :) > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > must confess that I

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 4 Aug 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I heard they have released the source to the kernel modules needed > > to run it. > > > > why not port them over? :) > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > must confess

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Robert Nordier
> > > It's usually best to temporarily change fdisk partition types, > > > so that sysinstall sees no existing FreeBSD slice on the drive. > > > However, there may be other problems involved here as well. > > > > Hmmm. This sounds a good plan. Would the following then work > > (I'm using `partiti

fetch: default to passive mode?

1999-08-04 Thread Chuck Youse
I have a really strong urge to submit a PR to make fetch default to passive mode, instead of requiring a command-line switch ... In this day and age, with firewalls and NAT abound, it's a bit odd that such a change has not already been made. Am I missing something? Is there a reason we haven't

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Milan Kopacka
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > > must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux > > kernel module does, which makes it somewhat harder to implement the > > same functionality on FreeBSD :-)

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Milan Kopacka wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > > > must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux > > > kernel module does, which makes it somewhat harder to

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Milan Kopacka
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > so one must purchase the program to get the kernel mods, is there > an evaluation that can be downloaded? They have all described on website. The program is key-protected, you can buy a key, or ask for evaluation key, which will work one month. You

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Graham Wheeler
Robert Nordier wrote: > > Because most modern BIOSes do CHS translation, the BIOS geometry is > not always evident from the geometry reported by the drive, and > FreeBSD may get this wrong, particularly if no existing partitions > are defined. > > Since you are installing to a drive with no pre-

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On 4 Aug 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > "Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > > Actually, with interfaces like this you should generally pass a pointer > > > to the structure in userspace, and stick a version number constant in > >

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Brian F. Feldman
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: > The argument for versioning is not simply because the size of ip_number > might change (it should be a sockaddr) but because other fields might be > added or removed. To avoid allocating a new syscall whenever this happens, > the structure should be versio

Re: [Fwd: Please support FreeBSD 3.x as host OS]

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I started looking at the kernel modules and porting them, however, I > > must confess that I don't fully understand exactly what the linux > > kernel module does, which makes it somewhat harder to implement the > > same functionality on FreeBSD :-) >

Re: Jail syscalls

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
"Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As I read it, sockaddr is a transparent type (overloaded, as it were). > So we would use something like: > struct jail { > ... > struct sockaddr; > char [SOCK_MAXADDRLEN - sizeof(struct sockaddr)]; >

Re: NSS Project

1999-08-04 Thread Assar Westerlund
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We need to be able to build an application that has no dynamically > loaded code for recovery purposes (/stand and /sbin) as well as for > security. Isn't that the same problem as with PAM? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "u

Re: Multiple versions of FreeBSD on one HDD

1999-08-04 Thread Robert Nordier
> > Because most modern BIOSes do CHS translation, the BIOS geometry is > > not always evident from the geometry reported by the drive, and > > FreeBSD may get this wrong, particularly if no existing partitions > > are defined. > > > > Since you are installing to a drive with no pre-existing non-

  1   2   >