changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Ronald Klop
Hi, In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1]. I could use "ps axd -p " to see the process tree of some ongoing task. In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p -D down". Can this become the default again? At least when -d is used. Regards, Ronald. [1] ht

Re: changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop wrote: > > Hi, > > In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1]. > I could use "ps axd -p " to see the process tree of some ongoing task. > In current this has changed to always need an extra option "ps axd -p > -D down". Can this become the d

Re: changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Ronald Klop
Van: Michael Gmelin Datum: dinsdag, 19 september 2023 13:01 Aan: Ronald Klop CC: ps...@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Onderwerp: Re: changes to ps -d? On 19. Sep 2023, at 12:30, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, In current the way ps -p works has been changed [1]. I could use "

Re: changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Piotr P. Stefaniak
On 2023-09-19 15:22:49, Ronald Klop wrote: Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to what it was" in https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html. Currently in "ps -d -p " -d is not back at what it was. I meant that it's back to t

Re: changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
> Curious about the meaning of "would be the best in that -d would go back to > what it was" in > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current/2023-August/004277.html. > > Currently in "ps -d -p " -d is not back at what it was. Yes, back to what it was pre-releng/12.2. The functionality yo

Re: changes to ps -d?

2023-09-19 Thread Jamie Landeg-Jones
Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > If you make "-D down" the default (as you suggested in a previous message), > then > we would be back to having the problem. To expand on that, if a "-D none" option is added, and "-D down" becomes the default, then from my personal point of view, that would be fine.

make installworld filed with "Required library libdialog.so.9 not found"

2023-09-19 Thread KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko
Hi, all I'm updating 15.0-CURRENT (main-n265415-b2bd87bb01a9) from 14.0-CURRENT, but make installworld filed with "Required library libdialog.so.9 not found" as follows: root@vm:/usr/src # make installworld make[1] warning: /usr/src/: Read-only file system. make[1]: "/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/

Re: make installworld filed with "Required library libdialog.so.9 not found"

2023-09-19 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 11:47:28AM +0900, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > Hi, all > > I'm updating 15.0-CURRENT (main-n265415-b2bd87bb01a9) from > 14.0-CURRENT, but make installworld filed with "Required > library libdialog.so.9 not found" as follows: > > root@vm:/usr/src # make installworld > make[1]

RE: make installworld filed with "Required library libdialog.so.9 not found"

2023-09-19 Thread Mark Millard
KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote on Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 02:47:28 UTC : > I'm updating 15.0-CURRENT (main-n265415-b2bd87bb01a9) from > 14.0-CURRENT, but make installworld filed with "Required > library libdialog.so.9 not found" as follows: > > root@vm:/usr/src # make installworld > make[1] warning: /us

Re: make installworld filed with "Required library libdialog.so.9 not found"

2023-09-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 20 Sep 2023, at 04:47, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > > I'm updating 15.0-CURRENT (main-n265415-b2bd87bb01a9) from > 14.0-CURRENT, but make installworld filed with "Required > library libdialog.so.9 not found" as follows: > > root@vm:/usr/src # make installworld > make[1] warning: /usr/src/: Read