Hello NGie,
Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective.
> `ifconfig_` is being overloaded for starting up hostap’s (even though
> ifconfig itself doesn’t support hostap — only `wlanmode ap`). I don’t
ifconfig doesn't support
> > It looks like a problem with WITHOUT_MANCOMPRESS.
> > I am looking into it.
> A fix is now committed. It has been broken since June.
> Regards,
> Bryan Drewery
Thanks for the fix, computer is now busy with NetBSD update from 6.99.44 (16
months old) to 7.99.21 for both amd64 and i386, but
Hi,
We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
to only build the modules.
What do you think about the following patch:
diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk
index ddf828e..f0920df 100644
--- a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk
+++ b/sys/conf/kern.post.m
On 26 October 2015 at 01:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello NGie,
>
> Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
>
>
>> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective.
>> `ifconfig_` is being overloaded for starting up hostap’s (even though
>> ifconfig itself doesn’t support
+1 to this thankyou!
-adrian
On 26 October 2015 at 02:11, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL to
> only build the modules.
>
> What do you think about the following patch:
>
>> diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/
On Monday, October 26, 2015 04:38:21 AM Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 October 2015 at 01:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> > Hello NGie,
> >
> > Sunday, October 25, 2015, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Ok, this is really not making sense from a design perspective.
> >> `ifconfig_` is being overload
On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
> to only build the modules.
>
> What do you think about the following patch:
>
> > diff --git a/sys/conf/kern.post.mk b/sys/conf/kern.post.mk
>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
> > to only build the modules.
> >
> > What do you think about the following
On 26 October 2015 at 11:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL
>> > to only bui
On 10/18/15 17:37, Patrick Hess wrote:
[ .. ]
> I can send you a full verbose dmesg if that's of any help to you.
>
>> "Timedout SCBs already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning."
>> when given any significant load :-(
>
> Just extracted an entire ports tree on that machine with no iss
On Oct 24, 2015, at 12:06 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> The thing I like most about encryption is that when I RMA a bad
> drive, I don't have to worry about my data leaking if I am unable
> to overwrite all the data...
You are optimistic if you believe that. We ($WORK) factor the cost of
DOA/
11 matches
Mail list logo
