TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On 12.05.2013 05:49, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 12.05.2013 5:44, Steven Hartland wrote:
Ahh so it was silly me, possibly r250208?
Yes, backing out r250208 fixes this error.
Thank you for the report. I can't reproduce the problem with none of
hardware I have, but it looks realistic. r250557 s
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-05-12 08:59:25 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 08:59:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
I have a newly installed 9.1 amd64 VM that I would like to update to
-current. I have pulled down head via svn:
svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src
and am attempting to buildworld:
cd /usr/src
make buildworld
This build is failing during bootstrap-tools when building makewhat
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:45:37AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
> FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
>
It's sound familiar; in /usr/src/UPDATING there is mention of this '-l'
issue. Search for 'install' in UPDATING and I think there is a
work-around.
Dan
On Sun, 12 May 2013, Paul Dokas wrote:
I have a newly installed 9.1 amd64 VM that I would like to update to
-current. I have pulled dow
Thanks Dan! I was hoping that this would be something simple like this.
The entry in UPDATING that you are referring to is:
20130121:
Due to the use of the new -l option to install(1) during build
and install, you must take care not to directly set the INSTALL
make vari
I am not a native speaker, but isn't there a typo in /usr/src/UPDATING
entry from 20130121?
--- UPDATING.orig 2013-05-09 09:46:55.0 +0200
+++ UPDATING2013-05-12 17:58:20.0 +0200
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
Due to the use of the new -l option to install(1) during build
On 12 May 2013 12:01, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> I am not a native speaker, but isn't there a typo in /usr/src/UPDATING
> entry from 20130121?
>
> --- UPDATING.orig 2013-05-09 09:46:55.0 +0200
> +++ UPDATING2013-05-12 17:58:20.0 +0200
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
> Due to t
Hello,
I have r235646 in three laptops at home running without any problem, one
is the master site where an USB key was produced to install all others;
as I said all three fine;
today I installed a 4th one and I'm facing frequent PANIC's all of the
same type:
panic: pmap_promote_pde: page table
It appears that the issue is i386- (or 32-bit-) specific.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:16:48AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:45:37AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> > TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on
> > freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> > TB --- 2013-
__
>
> FreeNAS
>
>URL: http://www.FreeNAS.org/
>
>Contact: Alfred Perlstein
>Contact: Josh Paetzel
>
>FreeNAS 8.3.1-RELEASE-p2 will hit Sourceforge the second week of April,
>and should end up as the last Fr
TB --- 2013-05-12 16:30:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 16:30:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-05-12 16:30:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 16:30:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Sun, 12 May 2013, David Wolfskill wrote:
It appears that the issue is i386- (or 32-bit-) specific.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:16:48AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:45:37AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2013-05-12 05:50:18 - tinderbox 2.10 running on free
TB --- 2013-05-12 16:30:19 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 16:30:19 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-05-12 19:35:55 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-05-12 19:35:55 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 12:04:09AM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Spil,
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:06:35AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
> S> There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
> S> ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
> S> there t
the marvell network adapter on my shuttle box freezes easily with minimal
network traffic..:(
root@test:/home/ktsin # dhclient msk0DHCPDISCOVER on msk0 to 255.255.255.255
port 67 interval 4DHCPDISCOVER on msk0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval
10DHCPDISCOVER on msk0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
On 12.05.2013 13:35, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 12.05.2013 05:49, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> On 12.05.2013 5:44, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>
>>> Ahh so it was silly me, possibly r250208?
>>
>> Yes, backing out r250208 fixes this error.
>
> Thank you for the report. I can't reproduce the problem with
22 matches
Mail list logo