Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

On 17 November 2012 21:45, Hiroki Sato wrote: > ad> Fixed. Damn those pesky non-IPV6 belivers. > > Sorry, I was careless about this part. It's fine. :-) God, I so can't grill anyone for breaking the build, given my track record! I hope you didn't mind me quickly fixing that up? Thanks, Ad

Re: problem booting to multi-vdev root pool

on 18/11/2012 02:26 Bartosz Stec said the following: > W dniu 2012-11-16 17:17, Guido Falsi pisze: >> On 11/16/12 16:45, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> Guido, Bartosz, >>> could you please test the patch? >> >> I have just compiler an r242910 kernel with this patch (and just this one) >> applied. >> >> Sy

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

Adrian Chadd wrote in : ad> On 17 November 2012 21:45, Hiroki Sato wrote: ad> ad> > ad> Fixed. Damn those pesky non-IPV6 belivers. ad> > ad> > Sorry, I was careless about this part. ad> ad> It's fine. :-) God, I so can't grill anyone for breaking the build, ad> given my track record! ad> ad>

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

TB --- 2012-11-18 19:53:50 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-18 19:53:50 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

TB --- 2012-11-18 20:53:16 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-18 20:53:16 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2012-11-18 21:02:39 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-18 21:02:39 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

prompt w/ uid 0 for cshrc

Hey, at the moment the current default csh prompt looks like user@hostname:directory% command This leads to an unexpected[*] result when using su (without "-"). In particular the user part is *not* changed to "root" (or "toor" or any other superuser indication) although the promptchar is change

Re: prompt w/ uid 0 for cshrc

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 06:32:20PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > Hey, > > at the moment the current default csh prompt looks like > > user@hostname:directory% command > > This leads to an unexpected[*] result when using su (without "-"). > > In particular the user part is *not* changed to "root"

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2012-11-18 22:56:31 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-18 22:56:31 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2012-11-18 21:52:51 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-11-18 21:52:51 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: netisr panic?

Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > I> I have this consistently with: > I> > I> FreeBSD firewall2.jnb1.gp-online.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #30 r243156: Fri Nov 16 20:12:33 SAST 2012 i...@firewall2.jnb1.gp-online.net:/ usr/obj/usr

Re: Tons of "sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure" on recent -current

On 18-11-2012 08:23, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On every IPv6 address of my card and router and every broadcast and > link-local scope addresses I see now: > kernel: sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure (non 0 ID): > > What does it mean and why there are so many of them? I have plain local > net wit