On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 23:44:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >2) Feb 6 01:36 (boot time)
> > >3) Feb 6 04:36 (+3 TZ future jump)
> >
> > These timestamps have been touched, and the clock has made a 3 hour
> > jump either forward or backw
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 23:44:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> > >2) Feb 6 01:36 (boot time)
>> > >3) Feb 6 04:36 (+3 TZ future jump)
>> >
>> > These timestamps have been touched, and
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:27:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 23:44:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >2) Feb 6 01:36 (boot time)
> >> > >3) Feb
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes:
>> This is not any different from any other filesystem.
>
>No, it IS different - no real filesystems mounted at this point yet, so no
>real timestamps damaged.
Think diskless NFS, think MD(4) based root, think...
The only problem is
Hello,
I trully suspect that for some reason this is specific to my box, but
I'm not quite sure if it is nor why it is. I hope this is the
appropriated place to ask, and if I'm mistaken, please correct me.
Since the last port update for XFree86-libraries, I've been unable to
get that po
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:44:29 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Think diskless NFS, think MD(4) based root, think...
They are read-only at this rc stage, so something could be damaged are
access times only.
> I avoid it entirely by using UTC time in my RTC, but this is not an
> option for m
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:27:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> > >On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 23:44:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
...
> > I have improved recovery code after timeout in -current.
> > Could you try that?
>
> Is scheduled for this evening.
> Thanks so far!
>
...
> > > > - fwcontorl -g 20
> > > > - sysctl hw.firewire.sbp.max_speed=0
> > > > - change SBP_QUEUE_LEN in
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Dear Friend,
I am Mr dudley rogers, the secretary of Commercial Farmers union branch in the
region of matabeleland,Zimbabwe. After the last general elections in my country
where the incumbent president MR. Robert Mugabe won the presidential election,
the government has adopted a very aggressive
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:40:09AM -0800, Kris Kennaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ---
> > panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
> > cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100
> > boot() called on cpu#1
>
> I get those on the bento cluster when the disk is starting to fail.
> dd'ing /dev/zero over it usually gives
Hi,
It works here for both cases. I've done intensive testing,
and I just cannot reproduce this bug.
The list here just looks normal as it should be:
localhost:/ on /a/localhost (nfs, nodev, nosuid)
127.0.0.1:/ on /a/127.0.0.1 (nfs, nodev, nosuid)
levais:/ on /a/levais (nfs, nodev, nosuid)
leva
Hi,
I'm about to write an article on FreeBSD for PC Magazine Romania and I
would like to concentrate on the new technologies introduced in FreeBSD
5.x.
Where can I find a (preferrably detailed) list of the new technologies
introduced with FreeBSD 5.x ? I would also like, if possible, to
get i
[ Bcc'd to -current following initial crosspost. Followups to -hackers
or directly to Mr. Penisoara. ]
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 03:17:15PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
>
> Where can I find a (preferrably detailed) list of the new technologies
> introduced with FreeBSD 5.x ?
Greetings Adrian,
Hi!
I recently upgraded my machine from 4.7-stable to 5.0-release. The
upgrade went almost smoothly. I say almost because so many things
changed between 4.x and -current that I missed a few. :) But overall,
I'm quite happy with the results.
I had problems with almost all my apps, at first. Third
> I had problems with almost all my apps, at first. Third part
> applications that weren't recompiled during the buildworld (ports) had
> linking problems. Take wget, for example:
>
> anarcat@lenny[~]% wget
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.4: Undefined symbol "stpcpy"
> anarcat
On Thu Feb 06, 2003 at 10:30:52AM -0500, Don wrote:
> > I had problems with almost all my apps, at first. Third part
> > applications that weren't recompiled during the buildworld (ports) had
> > linking problems. Take wget, for example:
> >
> > anarcat@lenny[~]% wget
> > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration
> of the syscall that locked it?
Shouldn't be. That would be a bug I believe. Userland threads should
never hold any kernel locks.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< htt
Hi again,
After noticing a huge delay between host names resolution and the
beginning of pages loading with Opera (6.11/Linux), I noticed that it
is trying to connect to 4.0.0.0:111 instead of the usual
127.0.0.1:111. I worked it around by setting up 4.0.0.0/32 as an alias
on lo0, but th
When I start the rsync daemon under 5-RELEASE, I can only connect to it
on the localhost. Trying to connect to it from any remote host fails.
Trying to telnet to the 873 port fails as well. Everything is on a
local lan connection without any type of fire-walling going on, also
using the default
It's been a known issue for quite some time that the SMP in 4.x is
broken with the SE7500CW2 boards (Linux and XP appear to function
correctly) and as far as I know a fix was never found. I have not tried
fooling around with FreeBSD 5.x on it however. Last I heard it appeared
to be related to an
Hi,
just got the following kernel panic when the USB hard drive I was
copying from at the time ran out of batteries and powered off:
umass0: ARCHOS ARCHOS USB2.0 (P4a), rev 2.00/11.01, addr 2
umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT
da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-
On 06-Feb-2003 James Schmidt wrote:
> It's been a known issue for quite some time that the SMP in 4.x is
> broken with the SE7500CW2 boards (Linux and XP appear to function
> correctly) and as far as I know a fix was never found. I have not tried
> fooling around with FreeBSD 5.x on it however.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:23:53PM -0200, Fred Souza wrote:
> After noticing a huge delay between host names resolution and the
> beginning of pages loading with Opera (6.11/Linux), I noticed that it
> is trying to connect to 4.0.0.0:111 instead of the usual
> 127.0.0.1:111. I worked it aro
I have similar problem after upgrading to a up-to-date -CURRENT.
> uname -a
FreeBSD cartier.home 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Feb 6 23:56:44 CST 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERI i386
My kernel config is simply a SMP-enabled GENERIC.
I keep seeing something bel
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration
> > of the syscall that locked it?
>
> Shouldn't be. That would be a bug I believe. Userland threads should
> never hold any ker
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:23:53PM -0200, Fred Souza wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> After noticing a huge delay between host names resolution and the
> beginning of pages loading with Opera (6.11/Linux), I noticed that it
> is trying to connect to 4.0.0.0:111 instead of the usual
> 127.0.0.1:111.
> Are you running 5.0-RELEASE or -current? If -current, when did you
> last rebuild your kernel? Some changes were made to the linux network
> emulation in the last few days. I was testing them and didn't notice
> any problems like this, but I may have missed something.
Sorry for not mentioning
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm also seeing this with Linux Phoenix, though I haven't tcpdumped
> the output.
I think there may be a problem with the new version of linux_sendmsg.
I'll check in detail at home, where I have linux_kdump installed.
It should be ea
Thanks to all those that replied with pciconf output from
various SiS chipsets (and thanks to those that sent from
other systems as well :) ).
I now have a significant amount of data to use for the SiS
chipset support, and am working on it over the next days..
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 02:53, Fred Souza wrote:
> Since the last port update for XFree86-libraries, I've been unable to
> get that port (x11/XFree86-4-libraries) compiled. I insistently get this
> error:
>
> cc -c -ansi -pedantic -Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith -I../include
>-I/usr/ports/
Title: ¯¬±z¦Ï¦~
¯¬±z¦Ï¦~
¤@¦|·¶¶¡B¤GÀsÄ˸¡B¤T¦Ï¶}®õ¡B
¥|©u¥¦w¡B¤ºÖÁ{ªù¡B¤»¤»¤j¶¶¡B
¤C¬P°ª·Ó¡B¤K¤è¨Ó°]¡B¤E¤E¦P¤ß¡B
¤Q¥þ¤Q¬ü¡A¬v¬v±o·N¹L¦n¦~
³Ì¦³¬¡¤Oªº---¤pºµºµ
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:16:22 +1000 (EST), "Andy Farkas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> sysinstall's 'FDISK Partition Editor' won't let me create a second slice.
>
> After pressing 'w' it says: "ERROR: Unable to write data to disk ad4!"
> then
check your securelevel
man securelevel
2 Highly
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:16:22 +1000 (EST), "Andy Farkas"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> sysinstall's 'FDISK Partition Editor' won't let me create a second slice.
>
> After pressing 'w' it says: "ERROR: Unable to write data to disk ad4!"
> then
check your securelevel
man securelevel
2 Highly
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Lucky Green wrote:
> > However, the Intel L440gx+ motherboard I have (it came in a VA Linux
> > rackmount) seems to have a separate CPU performing all kinds of
> > monitoring tasks, watchdog, etc, so I was hoping this separate CPU was
> > actually perform
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Andrew Gordon wrote:
> - On the latest machines featuring 'serial over LAN', you can
>persuade the management CPU to subvert the serial port and
>pass the data over one of the ethernet ports. This seems to use
>a proprietary protocol, but if you have one Windows m
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:16:22PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
>
> sysinstall's 'FDISK Partition Editor' won't let me create a second slice.
>
> After pressing 'w' it says: "ERROR: Unable to write data to disk ad4!" then
> "Disk partition write returned an error status!"
>
> Freshly cvsup'd a few
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:50:51 -0500
> From: Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:16:22PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> >
> > sysinstall's 'FDISK Partition Editor' won't let me create a second slice.
> >
> > After pressing 'w' it says: "E
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm also seeing this with Linux Phoenix, though I haven't tcpdumped
> the output.
I'm guessing the short patch at:
http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwmalone/linux_sendmsg.patch
should help. Can you try it and let me know?
Hi,
(this is unrelated to my earlier post about the kernel panic.)
when doing I/O to an IBM microdrive mounted via an USB CF reader, I get
read/write errors about once an hour or so. Here's an example:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=512 count=32
dd: /dev/da1: Input/output error
1+0 records in
0
Got thsi when opening gnomemeeting2 while having xmms playing:
acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "pcm channel"
1st pcm0:record:0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c:191
2nd pcm0:play:0 @ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/sound.c:191
Debugger("witness_lock")
Stopped at Debugger+0x5a: xchgl
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I'm upgrading my cluster to 5.0-R (fresh from CD), and everything works
swimmingly except logging in as user on the YPmap.
[3jane:~$] ssh ypuser@mcp
Password:
Connection to mcp.evil.mil closed by remote host.
Connection to mcp.evil.mil closed.
[3jane:~$] ssh user@mcp
Password:
However, I can su
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 05:31 PM, Sean Winn wrote:
What does netstat -na | grep 873 show?
On one machine that rsync start's on, I get this from netstat.
tcp6 0 0 *.873 *.*
LISTEN
On another machine that it just dies and never seems
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Barkley Vowk wrote:
> I'm upgrading my cluster to 5.0-R (fresh from CD), and everything works
> swimmingly except logging in as user on the YPmap.
I have about six boxes at work using 5.0-CURRENT and 5.0-RELEASE with NIS
accounts without any apparent problems. I did shoot my
º¸ÁöÅÚ´åÄÄ
BoziTel.com
¼ºÇö¾Æ ´©µå
2ź !
À¯¹Î Æ÷¸£³ë¹«·á°ø°³
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ¿øÇÏ½Ã¸é ¹æ¹®ÇϽþî Ãʱâȸé ÇÏ´Ü¿¡¼
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ó¸®ÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:28:26PM +, David Malone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I'm also seeing this with Linux Phoenix, though I haven't tcpdumped
> > the output.
>
> I'm guessing the short patch at:
>
> http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dwmalone/l
Hi,
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 22:28:26 +
> David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dwmalone> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:00:21AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I'm also seeing this with Linux Phoenix, though I haven't tcpdumped
> the output.
dwmalone> I'm guessing the short patch at:
dwmalo
My 5.0R kernel complains about "READ timeout" and "resetting" when I try
to dd the disk. But everything *works* if I boot the same equipment with
4.5R and 4.7R. It seems that the error can occur on any sector I pick as
long as I keep reading it inside a loop, a sign of timing problems.
The 5.0
> > ago.) Has anyone seen this? How do I fix it?
>
> Please remove your nonstandard CFLAGS and try again.
Yes, that was the problem. Thank you :-)
Fred
--
"The first marriage is the triumph of imagination over intelligence,
and the second the triumph of hope over experience."
msg519
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 13:44, Dong Lin wrote:
> My 5.0R kernel complains about "READ timeout" and "resetting" when I try
> to dd the disk. But everything *works* if I boot the same equipment with
> 4.5R and 4.7R. It seems that the error can occur on any sector I pick as
> long as I keep reading i
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> His board is a WV2, not a CW2. The WV2's should work fine though they
> might need a BIOS update.
I can verify the WV2's ... just built a server with one of these .. can't
verify the BIOS issue, as it was upgraded before I got the machine, but
have been
Can someone please test for me if the following patch gets crashdumps
working on the ida driver under -current?
http://people.freebsd.org/~ps/ida.diff
recompile and all that jazz
break into DDB and type 'call doadump'
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu
Hi,
For about two weeks now, each time I halt my computer, all the buffers are not
synced (sometimes they are 1, 2 or 5).
Moreover, when I compile my custom kernel, at the linking stage ("linking
kernel.debug") I got ENOMEM at 0xadress(ad0s1g) (ad0s1g is my /usr slice) (
a time I even got a panic
It seems Dong Lin wrote:
>
> My 5.0R kernel complains about "READ timeout" and "resetting" when I try
> to dd the disk. But everything *works* if I boot the same equipment with
> 4.5R and 4.7R. It seems that the error can occur on any sector I pick as
> long as I keep reading it inside a loop,
Hi all,
I've just cvsup'd and when booting I have this warning that I do not understand
uname -a
FreeBSD princess.wokonet.jp 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #5: Fri Feb 7 14:40:51
JST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KERNEL2 i386
and the message is : sockstat: struct xunpcb size
Stephen Cravey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm getting an error when trying to boot any of the 5.0-RELEASE cd's
> something like:
>
> CD Loader 1.01
> Building txxx boot loader arguments
> Could not find primary volume descriptor
>
>
> and then it dies there. txxx is illegible in my notes, bu
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 21:03, Peter Kostouros wrote:
> Hi
>
> I experienced the problem with kernels from last weekend. I rebuilt
> yesterday, but have not undergone high loads since. I will do thorough tests
> over the weekend.
>
> Keep in mind there have been some complaints recently, and there
58 matches
Mail list logo
