Am 20.12.2020 um 05:26 schrieb Jean SUZINEAU via fpc-pascal:
I know you don't like objects, but maybe something like :
Using modeswitch AdvancedRecords that also works with record types.
And I'd suggest a case-statement as well. Anything else will only be
slower or just as fragile.
Regard
El 19/12/20 a les 23:15, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
On 19/12/2020 22:35, Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal wrote:
I'm trying to use a c library where I can define a logging plugin.
The c prototype for the callback is
void (*log)(void *logContext, UA_LogLevel level, UA_LogCategory
ca
Am 14.12.2020 um 09:08 schrieb Marc Weustink via fpc-pascal:
On 4-12-2020 13:01, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
Dňa 2.12.2020 o 16:09 Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal napísal(a):
On 2020-12-02 16:01, LacaK via fpc-pascal wrote:
Dňa 2.12.2020 o 13:55 Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal napísal(a):
On 2020-12
On 20/12/2020 13:01, Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal wrote:
> El 19/12/20 a les 23:15, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
>> It is indeed not possible to implement a function with C varargs in FPC.
>
> I was afraid that's the answer :-(
>
> as an ugly workaround, I wrote a c library that vsnprint
On 2020-12-20 14:00, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote:
On 20/12/2020 13:01, Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal wrote:
El 19/12/20 a les 23:15, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
It is indeed not possible to implement a function with C varargs in
FPC.
I was afraid that's the answer :-(
as an ugl
On 2020-12-20 11:56, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 20.12.2020 um 05:26 schrieb Jean SUZINEAU via fpc-pascal:
I know you don't like objects, but maybe something like :
Using modeswitch AdvancedRecords that also works with record types.
And I'd suggest a case-statement as well. Anything
On 20/12/2020 14:43, Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal wrote:
> On 2020-12-20 14:00, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal wrote:
>> On 20/12/2020 13:01, Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal wrote:
>>> El 19/12/20 a les 23:15, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
It is indeed not possible to implement a function with
On 12/19/20 10:02 PM, James Richters wrote:
No, this is just a simplified example..
ok...
The procedure will be working with dozens of records, so I need a way to call
the procedure and specify which element of all the records to use... it will
not be called for every element.
in that case, t
Am 20.12.2020 um 14:47 schrieb Tomas Hajny via fpc-pascal:
On 2020-12-20 11:56, Sven Barth via fpc-pascal wrote:
Am 20.12.2020 um 05:26 schrieb Jean SUZINEAU via fpc-pascal:
I know you don't like objects, but maybe something like :
Using modeswitch AdvancedRecords that also works with recor
What I’m hopping to accomplish isn't to get it to work... it's to consolidate a
whole bunch of
functions and procedures that are all exactly the same except for which axis I
am working with...
I have 9 possible Axis, X,Y,Z,W,L.R,A,B,C
And I have Procedures:
Procedure Move_X;
Begin
DoSomethi
El 20/12/20 a les 16:02, James Richters via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
What I’m hopping to accomplish isn't to get it to work... it's to consolidate a
whole bunch of
functions and procedures that are all exactly the same except for which axis I
am working with...
I have 9 possible Axis, X,Y,Z,W,L.R
Thank you Luca, that will work much better for me!
James
-Original Message-
From: fpc-pascal On Behalf Of Luca
Olivetti via fpc-pascal
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2020 10:11 AM
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Cc: Luca Olivetti
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Selecting Records with a var
El 20/12/20 a les 14:00, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
On 20/12/2020 13:01, Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal wrote:
El 19/12/20 a les 23:15, Jonas Maebe via fpc-pascal ha escrit:
It is indeed not possible to implement a function with C varargs in FPC.
I was afraid that's the answer :-(
a
On 12/20/2020 7:11 AM, Luca Olivetti via fpc-pascal wrote:
Then change your data model.
Instead of
Axis_record = record
X,Y,Z,A,B,C : Double;
End;
use
AxisName = (X,Y,Z,A,B,C);
Axis_record = array[AxisName] of double;
then it's easy to do what you want.
procedure DoSomething(var Axis:
On 12/19/20 6:35 PM, Liam Proven via fpc-pascal wrote:
https://github.com/magiblot/tvision
Someone enterprising could make a TurboPascal clone out of FPC. :-)
Meh. FPC has had a Turbo Pascal-like console IDE for many years. It uses
Free Vision, which is a pascal port of the C++ version of Tur
Yes, I was trying to keep my data structure, because there were thousands of
occurrences ..
This project has had that structure since Turbo Pascal back in the 80s when it
only had 3 axis
It seemed like a good way to have variables all with the same name, and back
then it wasn't so bad to have
James, I remember going through some similar motions as you are. Looks like
you are searching for a form of indexing your record fields.
So many good suggestions, I had to join the fray and try something... My
preferred approach would also be an ordinal type for the axes and a
record variant, as al
Le 20/12/2020 à 16:02, James Richters via fpc-pascal a écrit :
If I need a bunch of case statements, it's atcually worse than if I just have
separate procedures.
No, in fact the case statement is written only once, in the
implementation of TAxisRecord, and in procedure
Move_It(Axis_Letter:Ch
18 matches
Mail list logo
