On 2012-10-24 07:52, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> However, given the total lack of documentation, it is hard to say.
+1
I had a look too, the Embarcadero website isn't much help.
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@list
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-10-24 07:52, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
However, given the total lack of documentation, it is hard to say.
+1
I had a look too, the Embarcadero website isn't much help.
From what I've seen, I can surmise it is geared towards t
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
> > Recently observer support was added to fpc.
> >
> > Just wondering what path fpc will follow:
> >
> > 1) Ditches the current fpc implementation and implements a Delphi
> > compatible interface
> >
> > 2) Time to diverge from Delphi. Keep
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
Recently observer support was added to fpc.
Just wondering what path fpc will follow:
1) Ditches the current fpc implementation and implements a Delphi
compatible interface
2) Time to d
On 2012-10-24 09:59, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
>
> in the classes (!) unit, makes me shudder, though.
>
> How anyone can create such a convoluted system is beyond me.
Yup. [shaking my head in disbelief]
Delphi is going the way of the dodo.
Regards,
- Graeme -
On 2012-10-24 10:01, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> I can still unmerge the observer functionality from fixes/2.6.2. Then (1) is
> also still a possibility.
Please don't!
I've been waiting years for that in FPC, and am actively building work
based on that functionality.
G.
__
Am 24.10.2012 10:59, schrieb michael.vancann...@wisa.be:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-10-24 07:52, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
However, given the total lack of documentation, it is hard to say.
+1
I had a look too, the Embarcadero website isn't much help.
I have started work on the fpc avr32. I used the patches from Laksen to get
started but am using the newer released fpc as a code base.
So far I have added support for the following processors :
at32uc3b0256es
at32uc3b0256
at32uc3b1256es
at32uc3b1256
at32uc3c0512crevc
at32uc3c0512c
at32uc3c1512
Are you using the code from branches/laksen/avr32new or something older?
And have you managed to fixed the non-aligned access bugs, that was
where I got stuck?
Regards,
Jeppe
Den 24-10-2012 20:33, Michel Catudal skrev:
I have started work on the fpc avr32. I used the patches from Laksen
to
Le 24/10/2012 14:50, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen a écrit :
Are you using the code from branches/laksen/avr32new or something older?
And have you managed to fixed the non-aligned access bugs, that was where I got
stuck?
Regards,
Jeppe
I took the code from that new one. I am just starting. My first
Den 24-10-2012 21:16, Michel Catudal skrev:
Le 24/10/2012 14:50, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen a écrit :
Are you using the code from branches/laksen/avr32new or something older?
And have you managed to fixed the non-aligned access bugs, that was
where I got stuck?
Regards,
Jeppe
I took the code fr
Le 24/10/2012 15:22, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen a écrit :
PC relative word loads aren't aligned automatically, and due to the variable
instruction length such an instruction might end up on a halfword boundary. I
have no clue how to fix it in a simple way. LDDPC has a very small allowable
offset
2012/10/24 Graeme Geldenhuys
> On 2012-10-24 07:52, michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
> > However, given the total lack of documentation, it is hard to say.
>
> +1
>
> I had a look too, the Embarcadero website isn't much help.
>
>
First some considerations:
- Initially i questioned the fpc obsev
Le 24/10/2012 15:22, Jeppe Græsdal Johansen a écrit :
PC relative word loads aren't aligned automatically, and due to the variable
instruction length such an instruction might end up on a halfword boundary. I
have no clue how to fix it in a simple way. LDDPC has a very small allowable
offset
Am 25.10.2012 01:55 schrieb "luiz americo pereira camara" :
> Regarding Delphi compatibility, currently fpc already lacks much features
in areas like attributes, anounimous methods, generics, interfaces, unicode
and some will never land at fpc.
- attributes are being worked on
- for anonymous meth
15 matches
Mail list logo
