On 12/2/21 2:46 PM, Petr Špaček wrote:
Why not make the TTL _dynamic_, based on time of last change in the RIPE
database?
Here is a wild example how it could work - all constants are made up, feel free
to substitute your own:
Step 1: Define upper bound for NS & DS TTLs which are "stable". Say
I support Willem, too! He seems to be a great fit.
~Peter
On 10/9/22 19:43, Shane Kerr wrote:
Colleagues,
The deadline for the DNS co-chair candidate volunteering is now over.
We have a single excellent candidate.
The period to express support (or concern) for the candidate starts now and
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for this draft. I know my response is kinda late, but I understand
that this is still an active endeavor.
In addition to the comments below, I'd like to raise the point of a
"false-positive" rate for any kind of filtering. This is, in my view, a crucial
aspect, and not cu
Hi,
Moritz has my support!
Peter
On 4/23/24 20:52, Willem Toorop wrote:
Dear all,
The deadline for volunteers/nominations has passed and I am very pleased to
announce that we received a single self-nomination: Moritz Müller applying for
a second term as co-chair.
We will now collect expres
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is an invitation for reactions (or if the appointment is
automatic in case of one candidate), but I'd like to express support
Yevheniya's appointment.
I assume that the RIPE DNS WG will, as per its charter, remain mostly focused
on operational and deployment stuff. Th
