Bug#1038754: random hangs during boot inside qemu

2023-06-20 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, the jenkins job of my package mmdebstrap spawns ~260 qemu virtual machines on amd64 to run the test cases in. For about a week now I'm seeing random (about every ~300) hangs during boot. The effect can be seen in these logs: - https://jenkins.debia

Bug#1038754: random hangs during boot inside qemu

2023-06-21 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: found -1 6.1.27-1 Quoting Ben Hutchings (2023-06-22 06:16:24) > Which version are you using - is it 6.3.7-1 from unstable? I added a uname call to the jenkins job: https://jenkins.debian.net/job/mmdebstrap-jenkins-worker/316/consoleText Linux osuosl3-amd64 6.1.0-9-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_

Bug#1050991: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64 due to using host-arch flags for native builds and vice-versa

2023-08-31 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Version: 6.4.11-1 Severity: normal Hi, starting with dpkg 1.22.0, linux fails to cross-build with build=amd64 and host=arm64 like this: # HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep gcc -Wp,-MMD,scripts/basic/.fixdep.d -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-prot

Bug#1050991: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64 due to using host-arch flags for native builds and vice-versa

2023-09-01 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: severity -1 serious Control: user debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Control: usertag -1 + ftcbfs Helmut informed me that bugs that break bootstrap (rebootstrap fails to cross-build linux-libc-dev because of this bug) are usually filed with serious severity, so doing that now. Thanks! signatu

Bug#1050991: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64 due to using host-arch flags for native builds and vice-versa

2023-09-01 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Bastian Blank (2023-09-01 09:40:11) > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:15:50AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > Helmut informed me that bugs that break bootstrap (rebootstrap fails to > > cross-build linux-libc-dev because of this bug) are usually filed

Bug#1050991: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64 due to using host-arch flags for native builds and vice-versa

2023-09-02 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Bastian Blank (2023-09-02 20:09:42) > This is https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/833 now. thank you! > > I had a look into debian/rules.d/tools/objtool/Makefile which seems to be > > setting the flags for this but wasn't able to figure out a fitting solution

Bug#1050991: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64 due to using host-arch flags for native builds and vice-versa

2023-09-03 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Bastian Blank (2023-09-02 20:10:44) > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:15:50AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > Helmut informed me that bugs that break bootstrap (rebootstrap fails to > > cross-build linux-libc-dev because of this bug) are usually filed

Bug#1037938: linux FTCBFS: perf builds a python extension for the build architecture

2023-10-05 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 16:40:54 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote: > linux fails to cross build from source again. It seems like the perf build > gained a python extension and that extension happens to be built for the > build architecture, which doesn't go well. Please export the magic python > cross b

CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?

2023-10-08 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
(please CC me, I'm not subscribed) Hi, I'm wondering whether it'd make sense for the Debian kernel to be built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y. Sorry if I have missed existing discussion on that topic but I haven't found any. Context: I'm maintaining a fork of the Debian linux kernel (thank you so

Re: CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y?

2023-10-10 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, Quoting Emanuele Rocca (2023-10-10 12:10:07) > Setting CONFIG_HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y on arm64 is likely safe for us too, but > we may want to run some benchmark first to see if there are any noticeable > slowdowns. I have a couple of arm64 boards here that I can run benchmarks on. What would

Bug#1019118: linux: [regression] introduction of rtla binary package broke cross builds

2022-09-03 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Version: 5.19.6-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org Hi, linux fails to cross build at least for arm64 but probably also for the other architectures for which the new rtla binary package is built with the following error message: $ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=1 DEB_BUIL

Re: Dependencies of linux-headers- packages

2022-03-03 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Felix, Quoting Moessbauer, Felix (2022-03-03 12:13:34) > the kernel header packages have a dependency to c/c++ compilers. E.g. the > "linux-headers-5.10.0-10-arm64" package depends on gcc-10:arm64 -> > cpp-10:arm64 (on bullseye). > > This becomes an issue when cross-compiling kernel modules f

RE: Dependencies of linux-headers- packages

2022-03-10 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Felix, Quoting Moessbauer, Felix (2022-03-10 11:02:44) > > You cannot add :native to runtime dependencies. The :native qualifier only > > makes sense for build dependencies. See > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchCross > > > > You can find the answer to your question in this thread: > > > > E

Bug#1009858: linux: please consider building the modules necessary for the MNT Reform laptop

2022-04-19 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Version: 5.10.106-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: jo...@debian.org Hi, currently, we add the following to the arm64 kernel config provided by the Debian kernel packaging to build a kernel that powers the MNT Reform 2 open source laptop: CONFIG_DRM_LVDS_CODEC=m CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLE_

Bug#1009858: linux: please consider building the modules necessary for the MNT Reform laptop

2022-04-25 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi Vagrant, Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (2022-04-26 02:07:51) > On 2022-04-24, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On 2022-04-19, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > >> currently, we add the following to the arm64 kernel config provided by > >> the Debian kernel packa

Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils

2024-06-23 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Version: 6.9.2-1~exp1 Severity: serious Hi, to reproduce this locally, on arm64, run the following: $ debvm-create -- --include=linux-image-generic/experimental "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian unstable main" "deb http://deb.debian.org/debian experimental main" $ debvm-r

Bug#1077827: even with [[featureset]] name = 'rt' enable = false in config.local/defines.toml, linux-headers-*-common-rt is still getting built

2024-08-02 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Severity: normal Hi, steps to reproduce: cat << END >> debian/config.local/defines.toml [[featureset]] name = 'rt' enable = false END according to Ben [1] this should disable the rt build and it mostly does but the package linux-headers-*-common-rt will still be built. [1] https:

Bug#1077922: regression: `debian/rules debian/control-real` results in: TypeError: 'BinaryPackage' object is not subscriptable

2024-08-04 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Version: 6.10-1~exp1 Severity: normal Hi, in our Debian packaging for the MNT Reform hardware family we add a `debian/templates/extra.control.in` which you can see at the end of this email. Since version 6.10-1~exp1 in experimental, running `debian/rules debian/control-real` results

Bug#1077827: even with [[featureset]] name = 'rt' enable = false in config.local/defines.toml, linux-headers-*-common-rt is still getting built

2024-08-07 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Bastian Blank (2024-08-07 21:31:57) > On Sat, Aug 03, 2024 at 01:52:47AM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > according to Ben [1] this should disable the rt build and it mostly does but > > the package linux-headers-*-common-rt will still be built. >

Bug#1029270: linux-image-6.1.0-2-686-pae fails to boot in qemu

2023-01-25 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, I investigated this a bit more and can confirm that this worked: linux-image-6.1.0-1-686-pae 6.1.4-1 while this one does not: linux-image-6.1.0-2-686-pae 6.1.7-1 To figure out where the regression comes from, I built 6.1.7 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git

Bug#1029270: linux-image-6.1.0-2-686-pae fails to boot in qemu

2023-02-02 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:59:06 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 05:05:53PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 04:42:27PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > > > Control: severity -1 normal > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 03:55:5

Bug#1035063: please consider enabling joystick support on arm64

2023-04-28 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Source: linux Version: 6.1.25-1 Severity: normal Hi, please consider enabling CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK for the arm64 kernel. Today I was surprised that plugging my xbox 360 controller into the USB port of my (arm64) laptop did not just work as it did with the (amd64) laptop of my partner. I enable

Bug#1035063: please consider enabling joystick support on arm64

2023-04-28 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Control: tag -1 + patch Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2023-04-28 17:50:41) > please consider enabling CONFIG_INPUT_JOYSTICK for the arm64 kernel. https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/708 signature.asc Description: signature

Bug#1094244: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mbranch-protection=standard’

2025-02-01 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Quoting Salvatore Bonaccorso (2025-02-01 17:56:36) > This should be fixed upstream with 3075476a7af6 ("pm: cpupower: Makefile: Fix > cross compilation") . s/should be/is/ Thank you! :) signature.asc Description: signature

debian/templates/image.*.in: allow maint scripts in /usr/share/kernel/*.d

2025-02-02 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, in an attempt to not step on anybody's foot again, let me try to use the mailinglist this time to discuss this topic. This is a follow up of this MR which is not ideal because it does in shell what I think should be part of run-parts from debianutils: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linu

Bug#1063162: please omit single initrd.img generation if dpkg trigger for all is pending

2024-12-16 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Hi, On Mon, 05 Feb 2024 17:49:06 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > Currently, when installing other packages together with a new kernel, > initramfs image for the new kernel is generated two times: once it is > kernel-activated from /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools, and next it is > dpkg-trigg

Bug#1094244: FTCBFS amd64 -> arm64: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mbranch-protection=standard’

2025-01-26 Thread Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Package: linux Version: 6.13~rc7-1~exp1 Severity: normal User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftcbfs Hi, linux 6.13~rc7-1~exp1 fails to cross build from source with build=amd64 and host=arm64 like this: cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-pro