Hi guys, I was just wondering whether anybody has encountered a similar
situation to the following
We have an application we developed that we run on JBoss. When we ran it on
a Debian machine it seemed to ignore the machines locale (en_NZ) and use US
date formats instead.
The odd thing being
Stephen Zander writes:
> Package: gij-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre5
> Severity: important
>
> According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
> support the the complete java runtime environment. As gij fails to
> provide the java.awt.* classes, the provides on this package i
> > According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
> > support the the complete java runtime environment.
Well, AFAICT (looking at policy linked to www.debian.org), the Java policy
isn't particularly explicit. Section 2.1 states:
Java virtual machines must provide java
retitle 176628 java.awt.* classess don't work as expected for
java1-runtime
thanks
W liście z pon, 13-01-2003, godz. 18:26, Stephen Zander pisze:
> Package: sablevm
> Version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: important
>
> According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
> support the t
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 07:55, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I'm the main developer of the Jetty HTTPServer and Servlet
> container and a core developer on JBoss.
>
> Just a reminder (as I've emailed Joe before) that I'm more than
> happy to:
I haven't forgotten. Thanks for the group reminder though. I'
All,
After my last email regarding my new JBOSS debs, I found some
showstopper bugs within the package (ie. they didn't work).
I spent yesterday rebuilding and testing my debs. The versions
currently on my company site[1] have been tested to properly start/stop
the server without exceptions.
Th
Hi guys, I was just wondering whether anybody has encountered a similar
situation to the following
We have an application we developed that we run on JBoss. When we ran it on
a Debian machine it seemed to ignore the machines locale (en_NZ) and use US
date formats instead.
The odd thing being
Stephen Zander writes:
> Package: gij-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre5
> Severity: important
>
> According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
> support the the complete java runtime environment. As gij fails to
> provide the java.awt.* classes, the provides on this package i
> > According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
> > support the the complete java runtime environment.
Well, AFAICT (looking at policy linked to www.debian.org), the Java policy
isn't particularly explicit. Section 2.1 states:
Java virtual machines must provide java
retitle 176628 java.awt.* classess don't work as expected for
java1-runtime
thanks
W liście z pon, 13-01-2003, godz. 18:26, Stephen Zander pisze:
> Package: sablevm
> Version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: important
>
> According to the Java policy, packages that provide java1-runtime must
> support the t
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 07:55, Greg Wilkins wrote:
> I'm the main developer of the Jetty HTTPServer and Servlet
> container and a core developer on JBoss.
>
> Just a reminder (as I've emailed Joe before) that I'm more than
> happy to:
I haven't forgotten. Thanks for the group reminder though. I'
All,
After my last email regarding my new JBOSS debs, I found some
showstopper bugs within the package (ie. they didn't work).
I spent yesterday rebuilding and testing my debs. The versions
currently on my company site[1] have been tested to properly start/stop
the server without exceptions.
Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
