Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#654824: openldap: FTBFS(!linux): testsuite failures

2012-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello, On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:38:09PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: > Package: src:openldap > Version: 2.4.28-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid wheezy These tags seem superfluous? > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Justifica

Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#654824: openldap: FTBFS(!linux): testsuite failures

2012-01-08 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Steve Langasek writes: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:38:09PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds: > >> > Starting test045-syncreplication-proxied for bdb... >> running defines.sh >> Starting master slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... >> Using ld

Processed: tagging 654739

2012-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 654739 + pending Bug #654739 [kfreebsd-9] kfreebsd-9: non-standard gcc/g++ used for build (gcc-4.4) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

kfreebsd-kernel-headers

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Millan
Should we upgrade kfreebsd-kernel-headers to 9.0? I'm afraid of this causing breakage with 8.3 kernels. However if we stay with 8.x, we won't be able to upgrade them to 8.3 until 8.3 is uploaded to unstable. It might be problematic to put them on hold for so long. What kind of compatibility shou

Bug#654581: marked as done (libalias-dev: undefined reference to ip_next in libalias)

2012-01-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:33:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#654581: fixed in freebsd-libs 8.2+ds2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #654581, regarding libalias-dev: undefined reference to ip_next in libalias to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Processing of freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2012-01-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2.dsc freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2.debian.tar.gz libsbuf0_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf0-udeb_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libsbuf-dev_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb

freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-01-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2.debian.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2.debian.tar.gz freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2.dsc to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.2+ds2-2.dsc libalias-dev_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb to main/f/freebsd-libs/libalias-dev_8.2+ds2-2_kfreebsd-amd64.deb

Processing of freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes

2012-01-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1.dsc freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725.orig.tar.gz freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1.debian.tar.gz libsbuf0_8.3~svn229725-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf0-udeb_8.3~sv

freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2012-01-08 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1.debian.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1.debian.tar.gz freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1.dsc to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725-1.dsc freebsd-libs_8.3~svn229725.orig.tar.gz to main/f/freebsd-libs/freebsd-libs_8.3~svn

freebsd-libs 8.3 snapshot in experimental, PLEASE TEST

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Millan
Hopefully there's no uncaught ABI divergence like we had last time. Please test: sudo apt-get -t experimental install libcam0 libgeom1 libjail1 libkiconv4 libkvm0 libsbuf0 -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

termio constants on kfreebsd

2012-01-08 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Seems linux has a *lot* more termio constants than we do and agetty From util-linux is using all of them (or something like that). Use of IUCLC and OLCUC was aready conditional in earlier versions of util-linux so reverting to that seems fine. What to do with the rest? Conditionally defining

Re: termio constants on kfreebsd

2012-01-08 Thread Robert Millan
El 8 de gener de 2012 21:30, Christoph Egger ha escrit: > What to do with the rest? Conditionally defining all of them to 0? On my experience this works most of the time. I'd make sure that getty didn't break after this change, though. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd

Re: termio constants on kfreebsd

2012-01-08 Thread Christoph Egger
Robert Millan writes: > El 8 de gener de 2012 21:30, Christoph Egger ha escrit: >> What to do with the rest? Conditionally defining all of them to 0? > > On my experience this works most of the time. I'd make sure that > getty didn't break after this change, though. Here's a patch. I'll test it

Re: termio constants on kfreebsd

2012-01-08 Thread Christoph Egger
Christoph Egger writes: > Robert Millan writes: >> El 8 de gener de 2012 21:30, Christoph Egger ha >> escrit: >>> What to do with the rest? Conditionally defining all of them to 0? >> >> On my experience this works most of the time. I'd make sure that >> getty didn't break after this change, t

Re: termio constants on kfreebsd

2012-01-08 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi all! Disabling partx is *not* enough for util-linux to build on kfreebsd. Below is a full patch that gets me a building + functioning agetty as well (as far as I can tell). Regards Christoph Christoph Egger writes: > Robert Millan writes: >> El 8 de gener de 2012 21:30, Christoph Egg