Praveen,
I am using MappingFEField to get high order meshes which I construct by
solving Winslow equations.
I set initial condition and save it to file with 3 patches. As the figure
shows, it seems to me that the MappingFEField is used only for the cells
adjacent to the boundary. Is this what
Thanks Wolfgang. I should have checked the built_patches function. It works
fine if I give the third argument. But now I have to find the real reason
why my code is crashing with MappingFEField :-(
Best
praveen
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth
wrote:
>
> Praveen,
>
> I am usin
On 08/22/2016 07:30 AM, Praveen C wrote:
Thanks Wolfgang. I should have checked the built_patches function. It works
fine if I give the third argument. But now I have to find the real reason why
my code is crashing with MappingFEField :-(
There is always one more bug. Always.
Best
W.
--
All,
Timo and I are writing a proposal that will (hopefully) fund further
development of deal.II in the coming years. It would be helpful if we had an
overview of what other projects there are where people are funded to write
applications based on deal.II (whether or not they will be made avai
On 08/19/2016 01:15 PM, thomas stephens wrote:
Wolfgang, I appreciate your assistance so far.
I'm getting closer, but I still need some help. I would like to look at this
problem as it appears in [1], Equation 27 on p. 11, as the bilinear forms are
written as integrals, making things more clear
Dear Daniel,
Thank you for a very good answer, adding the fe_values_scalar and
cell_scalar fixed the problem.
I have a follow-up question about the solution I get out, how is the data
organized in the solution vector? Say for example I want to loop over all
the x components, how would I do tha
Joel,
You should not rely on any particular sorting of the dofs in the solution
vector. Instead you can ask the FiniteElement on each cell for the
component of a local dof by
const unsigned int component = fe.system_to_component_index(i).first;
Apart from that the DataOut object knows about co
Dear all
I have convergence problem with one of my codes using deal.II from git.
Using the Aug 4 version (commit ed1bdc6fc1931a664bc30920f66f054907a49cce)
the code converges to 1.0e-10 in 20 iterations.
Using the Aug 16 version (commit 2ca845c83a1bceb8d1d09df2ee729b4ec6d5547b)
does not converge,
> Using the Aug 4 version (commit ed1bdc6fc1931a664bc30920f66f054907a49cce)
> the code converges to 1.0e-10 in 20 iterations.
>
> Using the Aug 16 version (commit 2ca845c83a1bceb8d1d09df2ee729b4ec6d5547b)
> does not converge, residual is 1.8 after 20 iterations, which is a huge
> difference.
You c