[llvm] [lld] [flang] [clang] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

https://github.com/cgmb approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76955 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[llvm] [clang] [lld] [flang] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

@@ -520,6 +520,106 @@ Every processor supports every OS ABI (see :ref:`amdgpu-os`) with the following === === = = === === == +Generic processors also exist. They group mult

[flang] [lld] [llvm] [clang] [AMDGPU] Introduce GFX9/10.1/10.3/11 Generic Targets (PR #76955)

@@ -520,6 +520,106 @@ Every processor supports every OS ABI (see :ref:`amdgpu-os`) with the following === === = = === === == +Generic processors also exist. They group mult

[clang] [HIP] change default offload archs (PR #139281)

https://github.com/cgmb commented: Thanks @yxsamliu! To add a bit more context, this was my original email that raised the topic: > I wonder if we should consider revisiting the decision to default clang to > gfx906 [1]. I came across how that decision was made shortly after it was > implemen