@@ -3,12 +3,18 @@
/// 4.7 enables cfg_checksum.
/// 4.8 (default, compatible with gcov 7) emits the exit block the second.
// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir %t && cd %t
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -disable-red-zone -coverage-data-file=/dev/null
-coverage-version='304*' %s -o - | \
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
>From 375a71d114fffb94c16455f476364a7de9e08191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 03:41:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][CodeGen] Emit load of value
We were missing a loa
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Stellard (tstellar)
Changes
We do the same thing for libLLVM.so. This should help avoid issues when an
applications loads two different versions of the library at the same time.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pul
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109994
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
francisvm wrote:
I totally agree with you @tex3d, I wish we could add these constraints
somewhere in `Builtins.td` in a more structured way. The diagnostic change was
not unintentional, I just assumed we'd fix the one argument builtins in a
separate commit from this one (aimed at two args).
h
Author: Volodymyr Sapsai
Date: 2024-10-01T21:47:52-07:00
New Revision: 1202c24b0d128c4838252daeeb1268707da69507
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1202c24b0d128c4838252daeeb1268707da69507
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1202c24b0d128c4838252daeeb1268707da69507.di
https://github.com/vsapsai closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110780
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vsapsai wrote:
CI error
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/linux-56-59b8f5d88-r8xzr-1/llvm-project/github-pull-requests/libcxx/utils/generate_iwyu_mapping.py",
line 92, in
main(sys.argv[1:])
File
"/var/lib/buildkite-agent/builds/linux-56-59b8f
https://github.com/falbrechtskirchinger updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110496
>From 220d76a2b2327318a6b5261896736ddd3f05988a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Albrechtskirchinger
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:58:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [Serialization] Handle uninitialized
https://github.com/wlei-llvm updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109837
>From 07a2cab3fa5df2965f9f7da9ee2d3603581a47f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: wlei
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 20:23:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [InstrPGO] Instrument sampling profile based cold
function
---
c
Author: Henrik G. Olsson
Date: 2024-10-01T15:57:10-07:00
New Revision: bb8b9ac0ba5382bcf02f614b5b3a84c3699cf52c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb8b9ac0ba5382bcf02f614b5b3a84c3699cf52c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bb8b9ac0ba5382bcf02f614b5b3a84c3699cf52c.di
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+; RUN: opt < %s --passes=pgo-instr-gen -instrument-cold-function-coverage -S
| FileCheck --check-prefixes=COLD %s
+; RUN: opt < %s --passes=pgo-instr-gen -instrument-cold-function-coverage
-cold-function-coverage-max-entry-count=1 -S | FileCheck
--check-pr
@@ -314,51 +314,91 @@ class APValue {
DataType Data;
public:
+ /// Creates an empty APValue of type None.
APValue() : Kind(None) {}
+ /// Creates an integer APValue holding the given value.
explicit APValue(APSInt I) : Kind(None) {
MakeInt(); setInt(std::move(I)
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109994
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hnrklssn closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110772
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hnrklssn created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110772
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#108425
>From 133d368b16d11e44bc3fca92a042cf5ad0ce8dd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Henrik G. Olsson"
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:14:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[Utils] Add new -
zeroomega wrote:
> Thanks for the analysis. Per-target runtime dir strikes again! That setting
> keeps on creating issues (by no fault of its own) because it's not the
> default.
>
> Can we do something like this instead, then?
>
> ```
> config.substitutions.append(('%{lib}',
> '@LIBUNWIND_T
c8ef wrote:
Thank you so much for your quick review! However, it seems the current CI is
blocked by the issues mentioned in #110783 :(
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
>From 38430b6cdfc524972fbdabca6a037174eaf1549f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:08:14 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] 110558
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 inse
mizvekov wrote:
> Thank you so much for your quick review! However, it seems the current CI is
> blocked by the issues mentioned in #110783 :(
I wouldn't be worried about that for a simple change like this, you can go
ahead and merge.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
_
c8ef wrote:
Thanks! 🥰
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -9519,15 +9519,28 @@ Sema::ActOnStartRequiresExpr(SourceLocation
RequiresKWLoc,
} else if (Param->getType().hasQualifiers()) {
Diag(Param->getBeginLoc(), diag::err_void_param_qualified);
}
-}
-
-if (Param->hasDefaultArg())
+} else if (Param->
Author: c8ef
Date: 2024-10-02T12:01:31+08:00
New Revision: 679be527095ea60d5933b883ca276d8e593920ee
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/679be527095ea60d5933b883ca276d8e593920ee
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/679be527095ea60d5933b883ca276d8e593920ee.diff
LOG: [Cl
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= ,
Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
tbaederr wrote:
This example from the failing test should warn I think:
```c++
class Foo {
public:
void foo1();
void foo2();
void foo3(Foo
@@ -9519,15 +9519,28 @@ Sema::ActOnStartRequiresExpr(SourceLocation
RequiresKWLoc,
} else if (Param->getType().hasQualifiers()) {
Diag(Param->getBeginLoc(), diag::err_void_param_qualified);
}
-}
-
-if (Param->hasDefaultArg())
+} else if (Param->
https://github.com/hnrklssn closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Cydox wrote:
Interesting. You compiled with `-O2`, I compiled without optimization.
When I compile it with `-O2`, I now get `0`.
I've uploaded a gist with the disassembly generated with
```
clang -mllvm --x86-asm-syntax=intel -S test.c -o ./test-no-optimize.S
```
and
```
clang -O2 -mllvm --x86-
@@ -1784,6 +1784,12 @@ defm debug_info_for_profiling :
BoolFOption<"debug-info-for-profiling",
PosFlag,
NegFlag>;
+def fprofile_generate_cold_function_coverage : Flag<["-"],
"fprofile-generate-cold-function-coverage">,
mtrofin wrote:
I meant, why not jus
https://github.com/mtrofin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Henrik G. Olsson
Date: 2024-10-01T17:14:50-07:00
New Revision: e495231238b86ae2a3c7bb5f94634c19ca2af19a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e495231238b86ae2a3c7bb5f94634c19ca2af19a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e495231238b86ae2a3c7bb5f94634c19ca2af19a.di
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
LGTM overall; I just have some minor comments
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109994
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
Cydox wrote:
@bwendling I think you accidentally compiled the wrong branch. Looks like that
is in `builtin_get_counted_by`, but this PR is in `bdos-member-expr-error`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-testing-tools
Author: Henrik G. Olsson (hnrklssn)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#108425
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110772.diff
9 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/lit.cfg.py (-10)
- (modified) llvm/docs/Command
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Doug Gregor (DougGregor)
Changes
It is common practice in C to declare anonymous tags that are immediately given
a typedef name, e.g.,
typedef enum { ... } MyType;
At present, one can only express API notes on the typedef. However, t
bwendling wrote:
> @bwendling I think you accidentally compiled the wrong branch. Looks like
> that is in `builtin_get_counted_by`, but this PR is in
> `bdos-member-expr-error`
Yeah, sorry about that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
zeroomega wrote:
Looks like https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108999 broke the check
bots.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
zeroomega wrote:
But IIUC, the diagnostic message change from this PR might be unintentional.
The expected error message in 793ded7d0b7f1407636a98007f83074b8dd5f765 doesn't
align to the error message from other tests in the same file. Should that be
addressed?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pro
tex3d wrote:
Test fix has re-landed: fea18afeed39fe4435d67eee1834f0f34b23013d.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Tex Riddell
Date: 2024-10-01T18:26:05-07:00
New Revision: fea18afeed39fe4435d67eee1834f0f34b23013d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fea18afeed39fe4435d67eee1834f0f34b23013d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fea18afeed39fe4435d67eee1834f0f34b23013d.diff
L
tex3d wrote:
Unfortunately, I didn't see your revert, and my pull didn't show any changes
from main before I quickly committed the test change. So my test change would
also break the build with your revert. So I reverted the test change just now!
Revert: 5d308af894ccc3f7a288d6abd6f9097b4cbc8
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+
androm3da wrote:
Absolutely. That's been the status quo and this PR on its own can't change
that.
The intent of this pull req is to allow anyone to build a toolchain for
targeting hexagon (of which libc++, libc++abi, libunwind are a part).
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (c8ef)
Changes
This patch is a follow-up to #109831. In the discussion, we agreed that
having parameter checks scattered across different areas isn't ideal.
Therefore, I suggest merging the check from #88974 into the void
parameter
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/c8ef ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/c8ef edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
c8ef wrote:
CC @zyn0217 @mizvekov @cor3ntin
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tex3d wrote:
> But IIUC, the diagnostic message change from this PR might be unintentional.
> The expected error message in
> [793ded7](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/793ded7d0b7f1407636a98007f83074b8dd5f765)
> doesn't align to the error message from other tests in the same file.
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
>From 38430b6cdfc524972fbdabca6a037174eaf1549f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:08:14 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] 110558
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 inse
@@ -781,6 +798,9 @@ serializeValueProfDataFrom(ValueProfRecordClosure *Closure,
#define INSTR_PROF_COVNAME_COFF ".lcovn"
#define INSTR_PROF_ORDERFILE_COFF ".lorderfile$M"
+// TODO: Placeholder for Windows. We need to revise when we upstream this.
hubert-reinte
@@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
;; Ensure __llvm_gcov_(writeout|reset|init) have the correct !kcfi_type
;; with integer normalization.
; RUN: mkdir -p %t && cd %t
-; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=insert-gcov-profiling | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=insert-gcov-profiling \
+; RUN: -mtr
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110773
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
; RUN: mkdir -p %t && cd %t
-; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=insert-gcov-profiling | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=insert-gcov-profiling \
+; RUN: -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu | FileCheck \
+; RUN: --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-ELF %s
@@ -2962,13 +2964,34 @@ void PPCAIXAsmPrinter::emitPGORefs(Module &M) {
}
}
+void PPCAIXAsmPrinter::emitGCOVRefs() {
+ if (!OutContext.hasXCOFFSection(
+ "__llvm_gcov_ctr_section",
+ XCOFF::CsectProperties(XCOFF::XMC_RW, XCOFF::XTY_SD)))
+return;
+
+
@@ -914,6 +918,7 @@ bool GCOVProfiler::emitProfileNotes(
GlobalVariable *Counters = new GlobalVariable(
*M, CounterTy, false, GlobalValue::InternalLinkage,
Constant::getNullValue(CounterTy), "__llvm_gcov_ctr");
+Counters->setSection("__ll
@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
;; Ensure __llvm_gcov_(writeout|reset|init) have !kcfi_type with KCFI.
; RUN: mkdir -p %t && cd %t
-; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=insert-gcov-profiling | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=insert-gcov-profiling \
+; RUN: -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu | F
@@ -2962,13 +2964,34 @@ void PPCAIXAsmPrinter::emitPGORefs(Module &M) {
}
}
+void PPCAIXAsmPrinter::emitGCOVRefs() {
+ if (!OutContext.hasXCOFFSection(
+ "__llvm_gcov_ctr_section",
+ XCOFF::CsectProperties(XCOFF::XMC_RW, XCOFF::XTY_SD)))
+return;
+
+
@@ -781,6 +798,9 @@ serializeValueProfDataFrom(ValueProfRecordClosure *Closure,
#define INSTR_PROF_COVNAME_COFF ".lcovn"
#define INSTR_PROF_ORDERFILE_COFF ".lorderfile$M"
+// TODO: Placeholder for Windows. We need to revise when we upstream this.
hubert-reinte
https://github.com/hubert-reinterpretcast edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
>From 38430b6cdfc524972fbdabca6a037174eaf1549f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:08:14 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] 110558
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 inse
https://github.com/c8ef updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
>From 38430b6cdfc524972fbdabca6a037174eaf1549f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: c8ef
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 09:08:14 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] 110558
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 inse
https://github.com/bwendling updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
>From 375a71d114fffb94c16455f476364a7de9e08191 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bill Wendling
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 03:41:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][CodeGen] Emit load of value
We were missing a loa
wlei-llvm wrote:
Thanks for the context!
> Why not use the existing `-pgo-function-entry-coverage`
> (https://discourse.llvm.org/t/instrprofiling-lightweight-instrumentation/59113/14?u=ellishg)
> LLVM flag? It takes advantage of the `llvm.instrprof.cover` intrinsic which
> has less size and r
@@ -522,6 +526,28 @@ let Predicates = [BPFNoALU32] in {
}
def STD : STOREi64;
+class relaxed_store
+ : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr), (base node:$val, node:$ptr)> {
+ let IsAtomic = 1;
+ let IsAtomicOrderingReleaseOrStronger = 0;
+}
+
+class releasing_store
+ : PatFra
bwendling wrote:
I reverted my last commit. This leaves the original patch, which seems to work.
@efriedma-quic, would you be okay with this patch while I work to improve the
code in follow-up?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
cfe
@@ -649,6 +649,24 @@ static void addPGOAndCoverageFlags(const ToolChain &TC,
Compilation &C,
}
}
+ if (auto *ColdFuncCoverageArg = Args.getLastArg(
+ options::OPT_fprofile_generate_cold_function_coverage,
+ options::OPT_fprofile_generate_cold_function
@@ -1119,6 +1125,18 @@
PassBuilder::buildModuleSimplificationPipeline(OptimizationLevel Level,
// removed.
MPM.addPass(
PGOIndirectCallPromotion(true /* IsInLTO */, true /* SamplePGO */));
+
+if (InstrumentSampleColdFuncPath.getNumOccurrences() &&
+
zeroomega wrote:
We are seeing `Clang :: Sema/aarch64-sve-vector-trig-ops.c` test failure after
this change got landed.
```
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 1: /b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/bin/clang -cc1 -internal-isystem
/b/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/lib/clang/20/include -nostdsy
@@ -1784,6 +1784,12 @@ defm debug_info_for_profiling :
BoolFOption<"debug-info-for-profiling",
PosFlag,
NegFlag>;
+def fprofile_generate_cold_function_coverage : Flag<["-"],
"fprofile-generate-cold-function-coverage">,
wlei-llvm wrote:
Sorry if my PR des
wlei-llvm wrote:
> For your use case, can you use
> [ProfileSymbolList](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/32ffc9fdc2cd422c88c926b862adb3de726e3888/llvm/include/llvm/ProfileData/SampleProf.h#L1509-L1512)
> to identify very cold functions (executed but unsampled) or are you indeed
> look
https://github.com/tstellar created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110758
We do the same thing for libLLVM.so. This should help avoid issues when an
applications loads two different versions of the library at the same time.
>From 59673ed97d92df34d6f662da5a51f6e28806b5af Mon Sep 17
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Henrik G. Olsson (hnrklssn)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#108425
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110772.diff
9 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/lit.cfg.py (-10)
- (modified) llvm/docs/CommandGuide/li
bwendling wrote:
> > I reverted my last commit. This leaves the original patch, which seems to
> > work. @efriedma-quic, would you be okay with this patch while I work to
> > improve the code in follow-up?
>
> The original (and current) patch in this PR still introduces a regression. So
> it
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Cydox wrote:
No worries
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110487
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nico wrote:
Looks like this breaks check-clang: http://45.33.8.238/linux/149333/step_6.txt
Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
tex3d wrote:
@francisvm
This changed diagnostics, but didn't update all the affected tests.
See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110187#issuecomment-2387260975
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110198
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cf
@@ -522,6 +526,28 @@ let Predicates = [BPFNoALU32] in {
}
def STD : STOREi64;
+class relaxed_store
+ : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr), (base node:$val, node:$ptr)> {
+ let IsAtomic = 1;
+ let IsAtomicOrderingReleaseOrStronger = 0;
+}
+
+class releasing_store
+ : PatFra
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ namespace MultilevelSpecialization {
template<> template
void B::f(int i, int (&arr1)[a], int (&arr2)[b]) {}
// since-cxx11-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'f' does not match any
declaration in 'cwg2233::MultilevelSpecialization::B'}}
+//
c8ef wrote:
> Please also add a note in the `clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`
Done.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110638
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
michalpaszkowski wrote:
@AlexVlx I am not sure I follow the reasoning here. The idea behind those
various tests in `/SPIRV/optimizations/` (including this one)
@@ -1161,11 +1161,9 @@ void SVEEmitter::createIntrinsic(
uint64_t Merge = R->getValueAsInt("Merge");
StringRef MergeSuffix = R->getValueAsString("MergeSuffix");
uint64_t MemEltType = R->getValueAsInt("MemEltType");
- std::vector FlagsList = R->getValueAsListOfDefs("Flags
Author: Rahul Joshi
Date: 2024-10-01T06:52:48-07:00
New Revision: 5831eed8d038951eee0f9379de001a55ce352eb0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5831eed8d038951eee0f9379de001a55ce352eb0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5831eed8d038951eee0f9379de001a55ce352eb0.diff
L
Author: tigbr
Date: 2024-10-01T13:24:32+02:00
New Revision: 7b8f7beadcf1814b1f1aa985d344ca17747531a7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b8f7beadcf1814b1f1aa985d344ca17747531a7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7b8f7beadcf1814b1f1aa985d344ca17747531a7.diff
LOG: [c
Author: Chris B
Date: 2024-10-01T07:36:36-05:00
New Revision: b8b036a7fe5b6e7ec306e3b80367e22d157a492b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8b036a7fe5b6e7ec306e3b80367e22d157a492b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b8b036a7fe5b6e7ec306e3b80367e22d157a492b.diff
LOG:
Author: Simon Pilgrim
Date: 2024-10-01T11:21:22+01:00
New Revision: e96f7788f5176dcf39c4eb53e4146f1e791adf83
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e96f7788f5176dcf39c4eb53e4146f1e791adf83
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e96f7788f5176dcf39c4eb53e4146f1e791adf83.diff
@@ -4072,6 +4078,30 @@ static Value *upgradeX86IntrinsicCall(StringRef Name,
CallBase *CI, Function *F,
return Rep;
}
+static Value *upgradeAArch64IntrinsicCall(StringRef Name, CallBase *CI,
+ Function *F, IRBuilder<> &Builder) {
+
@@ -5553,6 +5553,14 @@ static SDValue getSVEPredicateBitCast(EVT VT, SDValue
Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
if (InVT == VT)
return Op;
+ // Look through casts to when their input has more lanes than
+ // VT. This will increase the chances of removing casts that introduce n
@@ -1003,6 +998,13 @@ defm SVFCVT_F32_F64 : SInstCvtMXZ<"svcvt_f32[_f64]",
"MMPd", "MPd", "d", "aarc
defm SVFCVT_F64_F16 : SInstCvtMXZ<"svcvt_f64[_f16]", "ddPO", "dPO", "d",
"aarch64_sve_fcvt_f64f16">;
defm SVFCVT_F64_F32 : SInstCvtMXZ<"svcvt_f64[_f32]", "ddPM", "dPM", "
@@ -5553,6 +5553,14 @@ static SDValue getSVEPredicateBitCast(EVT VT, SDValue
Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
if (InVT == VT)
return Op;
+ // Look through casts to when their input has more lanes than
david-arm wrote:
Perhaps better written as `casts to ` in
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
These are also called for vectors.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110699.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/InterpBuiltin.cpp (+8)
``diff
diff -
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
AlexVlx wrote:
This relies on `CodeGenPrepare::combineToUSubWithOverflow` firing, however when
encoding the int sizes we can do loop strength reduction before,
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110699
These are also called for vectors.
>From 4c7c6d3707e533d8300a622be6e02bf21b07e46c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Timm=20B=C3=A4der?=
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 18:39:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][byte
https://github.com/zimirza updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110366
From 4fb69942effb3cf34d07f33a14a95757b6ca5ee0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=97=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B0=D0=BD=20=D0=9C=D0=B8=D1=80=D0=B7?=
=?UTF-8?q?=D0=B0?=
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:05:42 +0200
Subjec
@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-; This test aims to check ability to support "Arithmetic with Overflow"
intrinsics
arsenm wrote:
This one is testing codegenprepare as part of the normal codegen pipeline, so
this one is fine. The other case was a full optimization pipeline +
@@ -1161,11 +1161,9 @@ void SVEEmitter::createIntrinsic(
uint64_t Merge = R->getValueAsInt("Merge");
StringRef MergeSuffix = R->getValueAsString("MergeSuffix");
uint64_t MemEltType = R->getValueAsInt("MemEltType");
- std::vector FlagsList = R->getValueAsListOfDefs("Flags
https://github.com/jurahul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110597
>From 7d9e44f13483c4a801ec7895aa231e4b7e11e223 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Joshi
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:55:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][TableGen] Change NeonEmitter to use const Record *
---
c
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
