On 03/14/2018 03:42 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:42:41PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
Wait for the tpmRegValidSts flag on the TPM_LOC_STATE_x register.
Since it's not quite clear when this flag may become valid, we request
access to the interace on locality 0, which must then make it valid.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <[email protected]>
---
src/hw/tpm_drivers.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
index ed58bf5..ad97f67 100644
--- a/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
+++ b/src/hw/tpm_drivers.c
@@ -374,12 +374,23 @@ static u32 tis_waitrespready(enum tpmDurationType to_t)
return rc;
}
+#define CRB_STATE_VALID_STS 0b10000000
+
/* if device is not there, return '0', '1' otherwise */
static u32 crb_probe(void)
{
if (!CONFIG_TCGBIOS)
return 0;
+ /* request access -- this must cause a valid STS flag */
+ writeb(CRB_REG(0, CRB_REG_LOC_CTRL), 1);
Would it be possible to do a sanity check with read operations before
doing a write operation? The fear is that the device is not present
and the write operation corrupts some other device, causes a bus
error, or something else undesirable.
-Kevin
If this one is controversal, the other two patches fix real bugs and we
should consider applying them. I think for testing Stephen's feedback is
primarily important on 1/3. Stephen, can you comment?
Stefan
_______________________________________________
SeaBIOS mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
