On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 9:09 PM Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote:
> Do SDCC users have a preference? If yes, why? My preference is to always go the gcc/clang road, according to the Principle of Least Astonishment. So, what do gcc and clang do (since they are the mainstream compilers that everyone is usually starting with) ? > Do any SDCC users currently rely on "plain int" (either directly, via > typedef or typeof) bit-fields being unsigned in SDCC? How much would it > inconvenience you if the next version of SDCC made "plain int" > bit-fields signed? An option to choose signedness, coupled with changing the default would be awesome in my opinion. That said, I wasn't aware of it, so I guess the change won't affect me as much as others. -- Steve Schnepp "A man is not dead while his name is still spoken." -- T. Pratchett - Going Postal, Chapter 4 prologue _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user