Am 11.11.21 um 19:04 schrieb Basil Hussain: > > It's only a small detail, and arguably not strictly 'wrong' for > big-endian platforms because %p formatting is (as far as I could > determine) "implementation defined", but I think this should be fixed. > Shall I create a feature request? Or a bug report?
While the stanard gives us plenty of freedom here, personally, I think %p output should be close to what one would get when printing a suitable unsigned integer type for a pointer cast to uintptr_t. Feel free to open a feature request (or patch, if you have one) ticket. Philipp _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
