Am 30.07.21 um 21:40 schrieb Ben Ferguson: > I am in favor of adding a cli option to enable the old calling method. > > This change can break nearly every naked member we have if I understand > correctly, and without clear notice we may be compiling code for the old > convention, which will just cause huge headaches. > If you want to be lazy about your naked functions, you could also just declare them as __sdccoldcall.
> Which convention used is not important to me, but I wonder what the > cause for the change is. Is it faster somehow? > In my experiments, is is both faster and gives smaller code size (typically - of course you can construct individual example programs where the old convention is better). Philipp _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
