Hi Philipp, On 3/20/18, Philipp Klaus Krause <p...@spth.de> wrote: > In the past, for a few weeks after a SDCC release, there usually were > quite some bug reports coming. People migrated to the new release and > reported regressions. SDCC 3.7.0 was quite unusual in the high number of > changes since the previous release, so I would have expected lots of bug > reports. > > However, this is not what happened. Actually, I didn't see any increased > activity on the bug tracker at all. I wonder why. My guesses are: > > 1) Few regressions. SDCC regression testing covererage gets better all > the time, so potential regression are caught early and don'T make it > into releases. > > 2) SDCC users are still using 3.6.0 instead of 3.7.0. If this is the > case, there is again a question of why. 3.7.0 was a source-code only > release. Did that prevent some from moving on to 3.6.0? Any other > reasons to stay with 3.6.0? >
I just noticed that Debian still using an even older SDCC version, even in the unstable repository: https://packages.debian.org/sid/electronics/sdcc BR, Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
