On 29.10.2015 09:07, Rémi ESSAISSI wrote: > Hello > > Great news , > > Does that include utf8 for the assemblers yet ? >
It would be nice to have in the long term, but we could get support in the compiler withut support in the assembler first. > > It is true that I proposed my self on that tho, > > but with very few ressources, I didnt have the time yet > > to study the SDCC tree to look at it . > > > > If one of the assemblers writer have the time to make me a road map, > > it could be even easyer .. > > > > > > Regards The assemblers are a good starting point for SDCC deveopment, as they are much easier to understand than the compiler. Our assemblers (with the exception of pic) are originally asxxxx. However, the fork and upstream have diverged quite a bit over time, and some of the backends have been made from the fork, even when there was no corresponding backend in upstream asxxxx. In the long term, we should probably try to merge imporvements from uptream into our fork, and get some of our stuff into upstream. If yu want to do unicode support in the assemblers, I suggest to add all of utf-8, utf-16, utf-32. The place for discussing that further would be the sdcc-devel mailing list. Philipp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
