On 18/06/2014 15:16, "Maarten Brock" <sourceforge.br...@dse.nl> wrote: > >When you use __at without initializer however, SDCC does not allocate and >you can define another variable (with __at) at the same address. It will >also not zero the variable at startup. This is probably exactly what you >need for a hardware register.
Exactly, thanks. But what about access efficiency? If I just declare the variable in the header and define it (with __at) in the c file, is the code generated to to read/write the variable different from if I just define it in the header? br Kusti This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. We will not be liable for direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on or as of transmission of this e-mail in general. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems _______________________________________________ Sdcc-user mailing list Sdcc-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-user
